Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 179, Issue 2, pp 219–233 | Cite as

Variability of quadriceps femoris motor neuron discharge and muscle force in human aging

  • Seth J. Welsh
  • Devin V. Dinenno
  • Brian L. Tracy
Research Article

Abstract

The purpose was to determine the contribution of visual feedback and the effect of aging on the variability of knee extensor (KE) muscle force and motor unit (MU) discharge. Single MUs were recorded during two types of isometric trials, (1) visual feedback provided (VIS) and then removed (NOVIS) during the trial (34 MUs from young, 32 from elderly), and (2) only NOVIS (66 MUs from young, 77 from elderly) during the trial. Recruitment threshold (RT) ranged from 0–37% MVC. Standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of muscle force and MU interspike interval (ISI) was measured during steady contractions at target forces ranging from 0.3 to 54% MVC. Force drift (<0.5 Hz) was removed before analysis. VIS/NOVIS trials: the decrease in the CV of ISI from VIS to NOVIS was greater for MUs from elderly (12.5 ± 4.1 to 9.94 ± 2.6%) than young (10.6 ± 3.3 to 10.3 ± 2.8%, age group × vision interaction, P = 0.006). The change in CV of force from VIS to NOVIS was significantly greater for elderly (1.45 to 1.05%) than young (1.42 to 1.41%). NOVIS only trials: for all MUs, the average RT (6.6 ± 7.7 % MVC), target force above RT (1.20 ± 2.7% MVC), SD of ISI (0.012 ± 0.005 s), and CV of ISI (11.1 ± 3.3%) were similar for young and elderly MUs. The CV of force was similar between age groups for trials between 0 and 3% MVC (1.74 ± 0.74%) and was greater for young subjects from 3 to 10% MVC (1.47 ± 0.5 vs. 1.21 ± 0.4%) and >10% MVC (1.44 ± 0.6 vs. 1.01 ± 0.3%). The CV of ISI was similar between age groups for MUs in 0–3, 3–10, and >10% bins of RT. Thus, the contribution of visuomotor correction to the variability of motor unit discharge and force is greater for elderly adults. The presence of visual feedback appears to be necessary to find greater discharge variability in motor units from the knee extensors of elderly adults.

Keywords

Knee extensor Motor unit Steadiness Aging 

References

  1. Adam A, De Luca CJ (2003) Recruitment order of motor units in human vastus lateralis muscle is maintained during fatiguing contractions. J Neurophysiol 90:2919–2927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen GM, Gandevia SC, McKenzie DK (1995) Reliability of measurements of muscle strength and voluntary activation using twitch interpolation. Muscle Nerve 18:593–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baloh RW, Jacobson KM, Socotch TM (1993) The effect of aging on visual-vestibuloocular responses. Exp Brain Res 95:509–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry B, Pascoe MA, Enoka RM (2005) Discharge rate characteristics of motor units in a hand muscle of older adults. Society for Neuroscience Itinerary Planner, 397.15, onlineGoogle Scholar
  5. Calvin WH, Stevens CF (1968) Synaptic noise and other sources of randomness in motoneuron interspike intervals. J Neurophysiol 31:574–587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carville SF, Rutherford OM, Newham DJ (2006) Power output, isometric strength and steadiness in the leg muscles of pre- and postmenopausal women; the effects of hormone replacement therapy. Eur J Appl Physiol 96:292–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christou EA (2005) Visual feedback attenuates force fluctuations induced by a stressor. Med Sci Spts Exerc 37:2126–2133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christou EA, Carlton LG (2001) Old adults exhibit greater motor output variability than young adults only during rapid discrete isometric contractions. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:B524–B532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Christou EA, Shinohara M, Enoka RM (2003) Fluctuations in acceleration during voluntary contractions lead to greater impairment of movement accuracy in old adults. J Appl Physiol 95:373–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole KJ, Rotella DL, Harper JG (1998) Tactile impairments cannot explain the effect of age on a grasp and lift task. Exp Brain Res 121:263–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Connelly DM, Rice CL, Roos MR, Vandervoort AA (1999) Motor unit firing rates and contractile properties in tibialis anterior of young and old men. J Appl Physiol 87:843–852PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. De Luca CJ, Erim Z (1994) Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force. Trends Neurosci 17:299–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Luca CJ, LeFever RS, McCue M, Xenakis AP (1982) Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions. J Physiol 329:113–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Enoka RM, Christou EA, Hunter SK, Kornatz KW, Semmler JG, Taylor AM, Tracy BL (2003) Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13:1–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erim Z, Beg MF, Burke DT, de Luca CJ (1999) Effects of aging on motor-unit control properties. J Neurophysiol 82:2081–2091PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Erimaki S, Christakos CN (1999) Occurrence of widespread motor-unit firing correlations in muscle contractions: their role in the generation of tremor and time-varying voluntary force. J Neurophysiol 82:2839–2846PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fransson PA, Kristinsdottir EK, Hafstrom A, Magnusson M, Johansson R (2004) Balance control and adaptation during vibratory perturbations in middle-aged and elderly humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 91:595–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuglevand AJ, Winter DA, Patla AE (1993) Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor-unit pools. J Neurophysiol 70:2470–2488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Galganski ME, Fuglevand AJ, Enoka RM (1993) Reduced control of motor output in a human hand muscle of elderly subjects during submaximal contractions. J Neurophysiol 69:2108–2115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gossen ER, Ivanova TD, Garland SJ (2003) Factors affecting the stability of the spike-triggered averaged force in the human first dorsal interosseus muscle. J Neurosci Methods 126:155–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamilton AF, Jones KE, Wolpert DM (2004) The scaling of motor noise with muscle strength and motor unit number in humans. Exp Brain Res 157:417–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris CM, Wolpert DM (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394:780–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kakuda N, Nagaoka M, Wessberg J (1999) Common modulation of motor unit pairs during slow wrist movement in man. J Physiol 520:929–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kornatz KW, Christou EA, Enoka RM (2005) Practice reduces motor unit discharge variability in a hand muscle and improves manual dexterity in old adults. J Appl Physiol 98:2072–2080PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Labyt E, Szurhaj W, Bourriez JL, Cassim F, Defebvre L, Destee A, Guieu JD, Derambure P (2003) Changes in oscillatory cortical activity related to a visuomotor task in young and elderly healthy subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1153–1166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laidlaw DH, Bilodeau M, Enoka RM (2000) Steadiness is reduced and motor unit discharge is more variable in old adults. Muscle Nerve 23:600–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leong B, Kamen G, Patten C, Burke JR (1999) Maximal motor unit discharge rates in the quadriceps muscles of older weight lifters. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:1638–1644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moritz CT, Barry BK, Pascoe MA, Enoka RM (2005) Discharge rate variability influences the variation in force fluctuations across the working range of a hand muscle. J Neurophysiol 93:2449–2459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mottram CJ, Christou EA, Meyer FG, Enoka RM (2005) Frequency modulation of motor unit discharge has task-dependent effects on fluctuations in motor output. J Neurophysiol 94:2878–2887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mottram CJ, Hunter SK, Rochette L, Anderson MK, Enoka RM (2006) Time to task failure varies with the gain of the feedback signal for women, but not for men. Exp Brain Res 174:575–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nelson RM, Soderberg GL, Urbscheit NL (1983) Comparison of skeletal muscle motor unit discharge characteristics in young and aged subjects. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2:255–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson RM, Soderberg GL, Urbscheit NL (1984) Alteration of motor unit discharge characteristics in aged humans. Phys Ther 64:29–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Parkis MA, Feldman JL, Robinson DM, Funk GD (2003) Oscillations in endogenous inputs to neurons affect excitability and signal processing. J Neurosci 23:8152–8158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Powers RK, Binder MD (2000) Relationship between the time course of the after hyperpolarization and discharge variability in cat spinal motoneurones. J Physiol 528 (Pt1):131–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ranganathan VK, Siemionow V, Sahgal V, Liu JZ, Yue GH (2001) Skilled finger movement exercise improves hand function. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M518–M522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Roos MR, Rice CL, Connelly DM, Vandervoort AA (1999) Quadriceps muscle strength, contractile properties, and motor unit firing rates in young and old men. Muscle Nerve 22:1094–1103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Salenius S, Portin K, Kajola M, Salmelin R, Hari R (1997) Cortical control of human motoneuron firing during isometric contraction. J Neurophysiol 77:3401–3405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Semmler JG (2002) Motor unit synchronization and neuromuscular performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30:8–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Semmler JG, Kornatz KW, Enoka RM (2003) Motor-unit coherence during isometric contractions is greater in a hand muscle of older adults. J Neurophysiol 90:1346–1349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seynnes O, Hue OA, Garrandes F, Colson SS, Bernard PL, Legros P, Fiatarone Singh MA (2005) Force steadiness in the lower extremities as an independent predictor of functional performance in older women. J Aging Phys Act 13:395–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Soderberg GL, Minor SD, Nelson RM (1991) A comparison of motor unit behaviour in young and aged subjects. Age Ageing 20:8–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sosnoff JJ, Newell KM (2006a) Aging, visual intermittency, and variability in isometric force output. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 61:P117–P124Google Scholar
  43. Sosnoff JJ, Newell KM (2006b) Information processing limitations with aging in the visual scaling of isometric force. Exp Brain Res 170:423–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sosnoff JJ, Vaillancourt DE, Newell KM (2004) Aging and rhythmical force output: loss of adaptive control of multiple neural oscillators. J Neurophysiol 91:172–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Taylor AM, Christou EA, Enoka RM (2003) Multiple features of motor-unit activity influence force fluctuations during isometric contractions. J Neurophysiol 90:1350–1361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Teasdale N, Stelmach GE, Breunig A, Meeuwsen HJ (1991) Age differences in visual sensory integration. Exp Brain Res 85:691–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tracy BL, Enoka RM (2002) Older adults are less steady during submaximal isometric contractions with the knee extensor muscles. J Appl Physiol 92:1004–1012PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Tracy BL, Maluf KS, Stephenson JL, Hunter SK, Enoka RM (2005) Variability of motor unit discharge and force fluctuations across a range of muscle forces in older adults. Muscle Nerve 32:533–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tracy BL, Dinenno DV, Jorgensen B, Welsh SJ (2006a) Aging, visuomotor correction, and force fluctuations in large muscles. Med Sci Spts Exerc (in press)Google Scholar
  50. Tracy BL, Mehoudar PD, Ortega JD (2006b) The amplitude of force variability is correlated in the knee extensor and elbow flexor muscles. Exp Brain Res. DOI 10.1007/s00221-006-0631-3Google Scholar
  51. Vaillancourt DE, Russell DM (2002) Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production. Exp Brain Res 145:275–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vaillancourt DE, Newell KM (2003) Aging and the time and frequency structure of force output variability. J Appl Physiol 94:903–912PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Vaillancourt DE, Larsson L, Newell KM (2002) Time-dependent structure in the discharge rate of human motor units. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1325–1338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vaillancourt DE, Larsson L, Newell KM (2003) Effects of aging on force variability, single motor unit discharge patterns, and the structure of 10, 20, and 40 Hz EMG activity. Neurobiol Aging 24:25–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Welsh SJ, Dinenno DV, Tracy BL (2006) Motor unit discharge and force variability in the knee extensors of young and elderly adults. Med Sci Spts Exerc Suppl 38: S442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yao W, Fuglevand RJ, Enoka RM (2000) Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. J Neurophysiol 83:441–452PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seth J. Welsh
    • 1
  • Devin V. Dinenno
    • 1
  • Brian L. Tracy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health and Exercise ScienceColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations