Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 179, Issue 2, pp 155–165 | Cite as

Dual adaptation to two opposing visuomotor rotations when each is associated with different regions of workspace

  • Daniel G. Woolley
  • James R. Tresilian
  • Richard G. Carson
  • Stephan Riek
Research Article

Abstract

Studies examining dual adaptation to opposing novel environments have yielded contradictory results, with previous evidence supporting both successful dual adaptation and interference leading to poorer adaptive performance. Whether or not interference is observed during dual adaptation appears to be dependent on the method used to allow the performer of the task to distinguish between two novel environments. This experiment tested if colour cues, a separation in workspace, and presentation schedule, could be used to distinguish between two opposing visuomotor rotations and enable dual adaptation. Through the use of a purpose designed manipulandum, each visuomotor rotation was either presented in the same region of workspace and associated with colour cues (Group 1), different regions of workspace in addition to colour cues (Groups 2 and 3) or different regions of workspace only (Groups 4 and 5). We also assessed the effectiveness of the workspace separation with both randomised and alternating presentation schedules (Groups 4 and 5). The results indicated that colour cues were not effective at enabling dual adaptation when each of the visuomotor rotations was associated with the same region of workspace. When associated with different regions of workspace, however, dual adaptation to the opposing rotations was successful regardless of whether colour cues were present or the type of presentation schedule.

Keywords

Motor learning Adaptation Visuomotor rotation Colour cues 

References

  1. Bays P, Flanagan R, Wolpert DM (2005) Interference between velocity-dependent and position-dependent force-fields indicates that tasks depending on different kinematic parameters compete for motor working memory. Exp Brain Res 163:400–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bock O, Worringham C, Thomas M (2005) Concurrent adaptations of left and right arms to opposite visual distortions. Exp Brain Res 162:513–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E (1996) Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382:252–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cunningham HA (1989) Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:493–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi F, Bizzi E (1996) Motor leaning by field approximation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:3843–3846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert D (1997) Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning. Nature 386:392–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hwang EJ, Donchin O, Smith M, Shadmehr R (2003) A gain-field encoding of limb position and velocity in the internal model of arm dynamics. PLoS Biol 1:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi F (2002) Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? Exp Brain Res 143:520–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1999) Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2:1026–1031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (2000) Learning of visuomotor rotations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20:8916–8924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Osu R, Hirai S, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (2004) Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand. Nat Neurosci 7:111–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi F (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208–3224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Shemmell J, Forner M, Tresilian JR, Riek S, Barry BK, Carson RG (2005) Neuromuscular adaptation during skill acquisition on a two degree-of-freedom target acquisition task: isometric torque production. J Neurophysiol 94:3046–3057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M, Young DE, Proteau L (1993) Determining movement onsets from temporal series. J Mot Behav 25:97–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wada Y, Kawabata Y, Kotosaka S, Yamamoto K, Kitazawa S, Kawato M (2003) Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force-fields. Neurosci Res 46:319–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang J, Sainburg RL (2005) Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions. J Neurosci 25:4024–4030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wigmore V, Tong C, Flanagan JR (2002) Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single model in motor working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:447–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel G. Woolley
    • 1
  • James R. Tresilian
    • 1
  • Richard G. Carson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stephan Riek
    • 1
  1. 1.Perception and Motor Systems LaboratoryThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyQueen’s University of BelfastBelfastNorthern Ireland, UK

Personalised recommendations