Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 179, Issue 1, pp 29–42 | Cite as

External postural perturbations induce multiple anticipatory postural adjustments when subjects cannot pre-select their stepping foot

  • Jesse V. JacobsEmail author
  • Fay B. Horak
Research Article


Previous research on human balance recovery suggests that, prior to an externally triggered postural perturbation, healthy subjects can pre-select their postural response based on the environmental context, but it is unclear whether this pre-selection includes the selection of a stepping leg when performing compensatory steps. We sought to determine how pre-selecting a stepping limb affects the compensatory steps and stability of young, healthy subjects when responding to postural perturbations. Nine healthy subjects (24–37 years of age) stepped in response to backward translations of a platform under their feet when, prior to the perturbations, the subjects either knew whether they were to step with their left or right leg to a visual target (the Predictable condition) or did not know whether to step with their left or right leg until one of two targets appeared at perturbation onset (the Unpredictable condition). The Unpredictable condition also included randomly inserted trials of toes-up rotations and backward translations without targets (catch trials). The results showed that, in the Predictable condition, the subjects consistently exhibited one anticipatory postural adjustment (APA; a lateral weight shift toward the stance limb) before stepping accurately to the target with the correct leg. In the Unpredictable condition, the subjects either (1) exhibited multiple APAs, late step onsets, and forward center-of-mass (CoM) displacements that were farther beyond their base of support, or (2) exhibited an early step with only one APA and kept their CoM closer to the base of support, but also stepped more often with the incorrect leg. Thus, when the subjects had to select a stepping leg at perturbation onset, they either became more unstable and used multiple APAs to delay stepping in order to provide enough time to select the correct stepping leg, or they stepped earlier to remain stable but often stepped with the incorrect leg. In addition, responses to catch trials in the Unpredictable condition included distorted step placements that resembled steps to anticipated targets, despite allowing the subjects to step with a leg of their choice and to a location of their choice. Lastly, the subjects’ voluntary stepping latencies to visual targets presented without perturbations were twice as long as their stepping latencies to the backward platform translations. Therefore, healthy subjects appear to pre-select their stepping limb, even when the perturbation characteristics are unpredictable, because relying on visual input provided at perturbation onset requires a delayed response that leads to greater instability.


Response selection Posture Balance Compensatory stepping 



We thank Sandra Oster, PhD for editorial assistance. This research was supported by NIH grants AG-06457 (Horak) and F31NS048800 (Jacobs).


  1. Bateni H, Zecevic A, McIlroy WE, Maki BE (2004) Resolving conflicts in task demands during balance recovery: does holding an object inhibit compensatory grasping? Exp Brain Res 157:49–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernheimer H, Birkmayer W, Hornykiewicz O, Jellinger K, Seitelberger F (1973) Brain dopamine and the syndromes of Parkinson and Huntington. Clinical, morphological and neurochemical correlations. J Neurol Sci 20:415–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burleigh A, Horak F (1996) Influence of instruction, prediction, and afferent sensory information on the postural organization of step initiation. J Neurophysiol 75:1619–1628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burleigh AL, Horak FB, Malouin F (1994) Modification of postural responses and step initiation: evidence for goal-directed postural interactions. J Neurophysiol 72:2892–2902PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandler RF, Clauser CE, McConville JT, Reynolds HM, Young JW (1975) Investigation of inertial properties of the human body. In: Aerospace medical research laboratory. Washington DC, pp 1–162Google Scholar
  6. Chong RK, Horak FB, Woollacott MH (1999) Time-dependent influence of sensorimotor set on automatic responses in perturbed stance. Exp Brain Res 124:513–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chong RK, Horak FB, Woollacott MH (2000) Parkinson’s disease impairs the ability to change set quickly. J Neurol Sci 175:57–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Damier P, Hirsch EC, Agid Y, Graybiel AM (1999) The substantia nigra of the human brain. II. Patterns of loss of dopamine-containing neurons in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 122:1437–1448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dimitrova D, Horak FB, Nutt JG (2004a) Postural muscle responses to multidirectional translations in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurophysiol 91:489–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dimitrova D, Nutt J, Horak FB (2004b) Abnormal force patterns for multidirectional postural responses in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 156:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donders (1969) On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychol 30:412–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghafouri M, McIlroy WE, Maki BE (2004) Initiation of rapid reach-and-grasp balance reactions: is a pre-formed visuospatial map used in controlling the initial arm trajectory? Exp Brain Res 155:532–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenhouse SW, Geisser S (1959) On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grillner S, Hellgren J, Menard A, Saitoh K, Wikstrom MA (2005) Mechanisms for selection of basic motor programs-roles for the striatum and pallidum. Trends Neurosci 28:364–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henry SM, Fung J, Horak FB (1998) Control of stance during lateral and anterior/posterior surface translations. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 6:32–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horak FB (1996) Adaptation of automatic postural responses. In: Bloedel JR, Ebner TJ, Wise SP (eds) The acquisition of motor behavior in vertebrates. Bradford books. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 57–85Google Scholar
  17. Horak FB, Nashner LM (1986) Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. J Neurophysiol 55:1369–1381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Horak FB, Nutt JG, Nashner LM (1992) Postural inflexibility in parkinsonian subjects. J Neurol Sci 111:46–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horak FB, Dimitrova D, Nutt JG (2005) Direction-specific postural instability in subjects with Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol 193:504–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacobs JV, Horak FB, Nutt JG (2005a) Compensatory step deficits in Parkinson’s disease: An inability to select motor programs. Gait Posture 21: S94–S95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobs JV, Dimitrova DM, Nutt JG, Horak FB (2005b) Can stooped posture explain multidirectional postural instability in patients with Parkinson’s disease? Exp Brain Res 166:78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Massion J (1992) Movement, posture and equilibrium: interaction and coordination. Prog Neurobiol 38:35–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McIlroy WE, Maki BE (1993) Changes in early ‘automatic’ postural responses associated with the prior-planning and execution of a compensatory step. Brain Res 631:203–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McIlroy WE, Maki BE (1996) Influence of destabilization on the temporal characteristics of stepping. J Mot Behav 28:28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rogers MW, Hedman LD, Johnson ME, Martinez KM, Mille ML (2003) Triggering of protective stepping for the control of human balance: age and contextual dependence. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 16:192–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vaughan CL, Davis BL, O’Connor JC (1991) Dynamics of human gait. Human Kinetics Publishers, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  27. Zettel JL, McIlroy WE, Maki BE (2002a) Can stabilizing features of rapid triggered stepping reactions be modulated to meet environmental constraints? Exp Brain Res 145:297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zettel JL, McIlroy WE, Maki BE (2002b) Environmental constraints on foot trajectory reveal the capacity for modulation of anticipatory postural adjustments during rapid triggered stepping reactions. Exp Brain Res 146:38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zettel JL, Holbeche A, McIlroy WE, Maki BE (2005) Redirection of gaze and switching of attention during rapid stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable postural perturbation. Exp Brain Res 165:392–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neurological Sciences InstituteOregon Health and Science UniversityBeavertonUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Physiology and PharmacologyOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biomedical EngineeringOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations