Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 175, Issue 4, pp 745–753 | Cite as

Motor unit synchronization measured by cross-correlation is not influenced by short-term strength training of a hand muscle

  • Dawson J. Kidgell
  • Martin V. Sale
  • John G. SemmlerEmail author
Research Note

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to quantify the strength of motor unit synchronization and coherence from pairs of concurrently active motor units before and after short-term (4–8 weeks) strength training of the left first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. Five subjects (age 24.8 ± 4.3 years) performed a training protocol three times/week that consisted of six sets of ten maximal isometric index finger abductions, whereas three subjects (age 27.3 ± 6.7 years) acted as controls. Motor unit activity was recorded from pairs of intramuscular electrodes in the FDI muscle with two separate motor unit recording sessions obtained before and after strength training (trained group) or after 4 weeks of normal daily activities that did not involve training (control group). The training intervention resulted in a 54% (45.2 ± 8.3 to 69.5 ± 13.8 N, P = 0.001) increase in maximal index finger abduction force, whereas there was no change in strength in the control group. A total of 163 motor unit pairs (198 single motor units) were examined in both subject groups, with 52 motor unit pairs obtained from 10 recording sessions before training and 51 motor unit pairs from 10 recording sessions after training. Using the cross-correlation procedure, there was no change in the strength of motor unit synchronization following strength training (common input strength index; 0.71 ± 0.41 to 0.67 ± 0.43 pulses/s). Furthermore, motor unit coherence z scores at low (0–10 Hz; 3.9 ± 0.3 before to 4.4 ± 0.4 after) or high (10–30 Hz; 1.7 ± 0.1 before to 1.9 ± 0.1 after) frequencies were not influenced by strength training. These motor unit data indicate that increases in strength following several weeks of training a hand muscle are not accompanied by changes in motor unit synchronization or coherence, suggesting that these features of correlated motor unit activity are not important in the expression of muscle strength.

Keywords

Motor Unit Maximum Voluntary Contraction Strength Training First Dorsal Interosseous Hand Muscle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia grant (274307) awarded to JGS.

References

  1. Amjad AM, Halliday DM, Rosenberg JR, Conway BA (1997) An extended difference of coherence test for comparing and combining several independent coherence estimates: theory and application to the study of motor units and physiological tremor. J Neurosci Methods 73:69–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker MR, Baker SN (2003) The effect of diazepam on motor cortical oscillations and corticomuscular coherence studied in man. J Physiol 546:931–942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bremner FD, Baker JR, Stephens JA (1991) Effect of task on the degree of synchronization of intrinsic hand muscle motor units in man. J Neurophysiol 66:2072–2083PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Carroll TJ, Riek S, Carson RG (2002) The sites of neural adaptation induced by resistance training in humans. J Physiol 544:641–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christakos CN, Papadimitriou NA, Erimaki S (2006) Parallel neuronal mechanisms underlying physiological force tremor in steady muscle contractions of humans. J Neurophysiol 95:53–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Classen J, Liepert J, Wise SP, Hallett M, Cohen LG (1998) Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol 79:1117–1123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Datta AK, Stephens JA (1990) Synchronization of motor unit activity during voluntary contraction in man. J Physiol 422:397–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Duchateau J, Semmler JG, Enoka RM (2006) Training adaptations in the behavior of human motor units. J Appl Physiol (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Farmer SF (1998) Rhythmicity, synchronization and binding in human and primate motor systems. J Physiol 509:3–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farmer SF, Swash M, Ingram DA, Stephens JA (1993a) Changes in motor unit synchronization following central nervous lesions in man. J Physiol 463:83–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Farmer SF, Bremner FD, Halliday DM, Rosenberg JR, Stephens JA (1993b) The frequency content of common synaptic inputs to motoneurones studied during voluntary isometric contraction in man. J Physiol 470:127–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Farmer SF, Halliday DM, Conway BA, Stephens JA, Rosenberg JR (1997) A review of recent applications of cross-correlation methodologies to human motor unit recording. J Neurosci Methods 74:175–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halliday DM, Conway BA, Farmer SF, Rosenberg JR (1999) Load-independent contributions from motor-unit synchronization to human physiological tremor. J Neurophysiol 82:664–675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jensen JL, Marstrand PC, Nielsen JB (2005) Motor skill training and strength training are associated with different plastic changes in the central nervous system. J Appl Physiol 99:1558–1568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kakuda N, Nagaoka M, Wessberg J (1999) Common modulation of motor unit pairs during slow wrist movement in man. J Physiol 520(Pt 3):929–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG (1995) Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 377:155–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keenan KG, Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM (2006) Amplitude cancellation reduces the size of motor unit potentials averaged from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol 100:1928–1937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kilner JM, Alonso-Alonso M, Fisher R, Lemon RN (2002) Modulation of synchrony between single motor units during precision grip tasks in humans. J Physiol 541:937–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirkwood PA, Sears TA, Tuck DL, Westgaard RH (1982) Variations in the time course of the synchronization of intercostal motoneurones in the cat. J Physiol 327:105–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB, Lee RG (1975) Synchronization of human motor units: possible roles of exercise and supraspinal reflexes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 38:245–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moore GP, Perkel DH, Segundo JP (1966) Statistical analysis and functional interpretation of neuronal spike data. Annu Rev Physiol 28:493–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nordstrom MA, Fuglevand AJ, Enoka RM (1992) Estimating the strength of common input to human motoneurons from the cross-correlogram. J Physiol 453:547–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pascual-Leone A, Nguyet D, Cohen LG, Brasil-Neto JP, Cammarota A, Hallett M (1995) Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. J Neurophysiol 74:1037–1045PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenberg JR, Amjad AM, Breeze P, Brillinger DR, Halliday DM (1989) The Fourier approach to the identification of functional coupling between neuronal spike trains. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 53:1–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sale MV, Semmler JG (2005) Age-related differences in corticospinal control during functional isometric contractions in left and right hands. J Appl Physiol 99:1483–1493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Salenius S, Portin K, Kajola M, Salmelin R, Hari R (1997) Cortical control of human motoneuron firing during isometric contraction. J Neurophysiol 77:3401–3405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schmied A, Pouget J, Vedel JP (1999) Electromechanical coupling and synchronous firing of single wrist extensor motor units in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol 110:960–974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Semmler JG, Enoka RM (2000) Neural contributions to changes in muscle strength. In: Zatsiorsky VM (ed) Biomechanics in sport, vol IX. International Olympic Committee. Blackwell, Malden, pp 3–20Google Scholar
  29. Semmler JG, Nordstrom MA (1998) Motor unit discharge and force tremor in skill- and strength-trained individuals. Exp Brain Res 119:27–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Semmler JG, Nordstrom MA (1999) A comparison of cross-correlation and surface EMG techniques used to quantify motor unit synchronization in humans. J Neurosci Methods 90:47–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Semmler JG, Kornatz KW, Dinenno DV, Zhou S, Enoka RM (2002) Motor unit synchronisation is enhanced during slow lengthening contractions of a hand muscle. J Physiol 545:681–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Semmler JG, Sale MV, Meyer FG, Nordstrom MA (2004) Motor-unit coherence and its relation with synchrony are influenced by training. J Neurophysiol 92:3320–3331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Semmler JG, Sale MV, Kidgell DJ (2006) Motor unit synchronization measured by cross-correlation is not increased with strength training of a hand muscle. Proc Int Australas Winter Conf Brain Res 24:2.4Google Scholar
  34. Van Cutsem M, Duchateau J, Hainaut K (1998) Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans. J Physiol 513:295–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yao W, Fuglevand RJ, Enoka RM (2000) Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. J Neurophysiol 83:441–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Yue G, Fuglevand AJ, Nordstrom MA, Enoka RM (1995) Limitations of the surface electromyography technique for estimating motor unit synchronization. Biol Cybern 73:223–233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ziemann U, Muellbacher W, Hallett M, Cohen LG (2001) Modulation of practice-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex. Brain 124:1171–1181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dawson J. Kidgell
    • 2
  • Martin V. Sale
    • 1
  • John G. Semmler
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Discipline of Physiology, Research Centre for Human Movement Control, School of Molecular and Biomedical ScienceThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.School of Exercise and Nutrition SciencesDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations