Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 177, Issue 4, pp 447–457 | Cite as

Impaired inhibitory oculomotor control in patients with Parkinson’s disease

  • Prakash Joti
  • Shrikanth Kulashekhar
  • Madhuri Behari
  • Aditya Murthy
Research Article

Abstract

A hallmark of voluntary control is the capacity to inhibit or change partially prepared responses, an ability thought to be compromised in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). To test this hypothesis in relation to oculomotor control, PD patients and age-matched controls performed a redirect task in which they were instructed to cancel a partially prepared saccade on some random fraction of trials. Using a race model framework, the time it takes to cancel a saccade, the target switch reaction time (TSRT), was estimated for PD and control subjects. While saccadic reaction times of control and PD subjects were similar, the average TSRT in PD subjects was 139 ms, and was significantly greater than the TSRT in controls, which was 113 ms. These results support the hypothesis that poor voluntary control exhibited by PD patients in a variety of complex behaviors may be caused by impaired inhibitory control as a result of basal ganglia dysfunction.

Keywords

Countermanding Double-step Saccades Reaction-time 

References

  1. Angel RW, Alston W, Higgins JR (1970) Control of movement in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 93:1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aslin R, Shea S (1987) The amplitude and angle of saccades to double-switch target displacements. Vision Res 27:1925–1942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asrress K, Carpenter R (2001) Saccadic countermanding: a comparison of central and peripheral stop signals. Vision Res 41:2645–2651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker W, Jürgens R (1979) An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double switch stimuli. Vision Res 19:967–983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bokura H, Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi S (2005) Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 43:967–975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Briand KA, Strallow D, Hening W, Poizner H, Sereno AB (1999) Control of voluntary and reflexive saccades in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 129:38–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabel D, Armstrong I, Reingold E, Munoz D (2000) Control of saccade initiation in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals. Exp Brain Res 133:431–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carl J, Wurtz R (1985) Asymmetry of saccadic control in patients with hemi-Parkinson’s disease. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 26:258Google Scholar
  9. Chan F, Armstrong IT, Pari G, Riopelle RJ, Munoz DP (2005) Deficits in saccadic eye-movement control in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 43:784–796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper JA, Sagar HJ, Tidswell P, Jordan N (1994) Slowed central processing in simple and go/no-go reaction time tasks in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 117(Pt 3):517–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corin MS, Elizan TS, Bender MB (1972) Oculomotor function in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 15:251–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawford T, Goodrich S, Henderson L, Kennard C (1989a) Predictive responses in Parkinson’s disease: manual keypresses and saccadic eye movements to regular stimulus events. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 52:1033–1042Google Scholar
  13. Crawford TJ, Henderson L, Kennard C (1989b) Abnormalities of nonvisually-guided eye movements in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 112(Pt 6):1573–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crevits L, De Ridder K (1997) Disturbed striatoprefrontal mediated visual behaviour in moderate to severe parkinsonian patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 63:296–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Crevits L, Vandierendonck A, Stuyven E, Verschaete S, Wildenbeest J (2004) Effect of intention and visual fixation disengagement on prosaccades in Parkinson’s disease patients. Neuropsychologia 42(5):624–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cools R, Barker RA, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW (2001) Mechanisms of cognitive set flexibility in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 124(Pt 12):2503–2512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeJong R, Coles M, Logan G, Gratton G (1995) Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:498–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Desmurget M, Gaveau V, Vindras P, Turner RS, Broussolle E, Thobois S (2004) On-line motor control in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain 127:1755–1773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Filoteo JV, Rilling LM, Strayer DL (2002) Negative priming in patients with Parkinson’s disease: evidence for a role of the striatum in inhibitory attentional processes. Neuropsychology 16(2):230–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fukushima J, Fukushima K, Miyasaka K, Yamashita I (1994) Voluntary control of saccadic eye movement in patients with frontal cortical lesions and parkinsonian patients in comparison with that in schizophrenics. Biol Psychiatr 36:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gauggel S, Rieger M, Feghoff TA (2004) Inhibition of ongoing responses in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 75:539–544PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanes D, Carpenter R (1999) Countermanding saccades in human. Vision Res 39:2777–2791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanes D, Schall J (1995) Countermanding saccades in macaque. Visual Neurosci 12:929–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanes D, Patterson W, Schall J (1998) The role of frontal eye field in countermanding saccades: visual, movement and fixation activity. J Neurophysiol 79:817–834PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Henik A, Singh J, Beckley DJ, Rafal RD (1993) Disinhibition of automatic word reading in Parkinson’s disease. Cortex 29:589–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hikosaka O (1997) [Changes and disorders in voluntary saccades during development and aging]. No To Hattatsu 29:213–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hikosaka O, Wurtz RH (1989) The basal ganglia. Rev Oculomot Res 3:257–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD (1967) Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 17:427–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hou R, Fender D (1979) Processing of direction and magnitude by the saccadic eye-movement system. Vision Res 19:1421–1426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ilinsky I, Jouandet M, Goldman-Rakic P (1985) Organization of the nigrothalamocortical system in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 236:315–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kingstone A, Klein R, Morein-Zamir S, Hunt A, Fisk J, Maxner C (2002) Orienting attention in aging and Parkinson’s disease: distinguishing modes of control. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 24:951–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kitagawa M, Fukushima J, Tashiro K (1994) Relationship between antisaccades and the clinical symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 44:2285–2289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Komoda M, Festinger L, Philips L, Duckman R, Young R (1973) Some observations concerning saccadic eye movements. Vision Res 13:1009–1020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kornylo K, Dill N, Saenz M, Krauzlis R (2003) Cancelling of pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans and monkeys. J Neurophysiol 89(6):2984–2999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lappin J, Eriksen C (1966) Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction time response. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 72:805–811Google Scholar
  36. Lisberger S, Fuchs A, King W, Evinger L (1975) Effect of mean reaction time on saccadic responses to two-switch stimuli with horizontal and vertical components. Vision Res 15:1021–1025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Logan G, Cowan W (1984) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychol Rev 91:295–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Logan G, Irwin D (2000) Don’t look! don’t touch! inhibitory control of eye and hand movements. Psychon Bull Rev 7(1):107–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lueck CJ, Tanyeri S, Crawford TJ, Henderson L, Kennard C (1990) Antisaccades and remembered saccades in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 53:284–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mari-Beffa P, Hayes AE, Machado L, Hindle JV (2005) Lack of inhibition in Parkinson’s disease: evidence from a lexical decision task. Neuropsychologia 43(4):638–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mink J (1996) The Basal Ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Prog Neurobiol 50:381–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murthy A, Thompson K, Schall J (2000) Neural control of saccade target selection during visual search: comparison of search-step and double-step. Abstr Soc Neurosci 25:806Google Scholar
  43. Osman AM, Kornblum S, Meyer DE (1986) The point-of-no-return in choice reaction time: controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 12:243–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Osman AM, Kornblum S, Meyer DE (1990) Does motor programming necessitate response execution? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform16:183–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parent A, Hazrati L (1993) Anatomical aspects of information processing in primate basal ganglia. Trends Neurosci 16:111–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Poliakoff E, O’Boyle DJ, Moore AP, McGlone FP, Cody FW, Spence C. (2003) Orienting of attention and Parkinson’s disease: tactile inhibition of return and response inhibition. Brain 126:2081–2092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Praamstra P, Stegeman DF, Cools AR, Horstink MW (1998) Reliance on external cues for movement initiation in Parkinson’s disease. Evidence from movement-related potentials. Brain 121:167–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Praamstra P, Plat EM, Meyer AS, Horstink MW (1999) Motor cortex activation in Parkinson’s disease: dissociation of electrocortical and peripheral measures of response generation. Mov Disord 14(5):790–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ray S, Schall JD, Murthy A (2004) Programming of double-switch saccade sequences: modulation by cognitive control. Vision Res 44:2707–2718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rieger M, Gauggel S, Burmeister K (2003) Inhibition of ongoing responses following frontal, nonfrontal and basal ganglia lesions. Neuropsychology 17:272–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roll A, Wierzbicka M, Wolf W (1996) The “gap paradigm” leads to express-like saccadic reaction times in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 111:131–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schachar R, Logan GD (1990) Impulsivity and inhibitory control in normal development and childhood psychopathology. Dev Psychol 26:710–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shaunak S, O’Sullivan E, Blunt S, Lawden M, Crawford T, Henderson L, Kennard C (1999) Remembered saccades with variable delay in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 14:80–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shibasaki H, Tsuji S, Kuroiwa Y (1979) Oculomotor abnormalities in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 36:360–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Strick P, Schell (1984) The origin of thalamic inputs to the arcuate premotor and supplementary motor areas. J Neurosci 4:539–560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Strick P, Dum R, Mushiake H (1995) Basal ganglia ‘Loops’ with the cerebral cortex. In: Kimura M, Graybiel AM (eds) Functions of the cortico-basal ganglia loop. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 106–124Google Scholar
  57. Teravainen H, Calne D (1980) Studies of parkinsonian movement: 2. Initiation of fast voluntary eye movement during postural disturbance. Acta Neurol Scand 62:149–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ventre J, Zee D, Papageorgiou H, Reich S (1992) Abnormalities of predictive saccades in hemi-Parkinson’s disease. Brain 115(Pt 4):1147–1165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vidailhet M, Rivaud S, Gouider-Khouja N, Pillon B, Bonnet A, Gaymard B, Agid Y, Pierrot-Deseilligny C (1994) Eye movements in parkinsonian syndromes. Ann Neurol 35:420–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vince MA (1948) The intermittency of control movements and the psychology refractory period. Brit J Psychol 38:149–157Google Scholar
  61. Westheimer G (1954) Eye movement responses to a horizontally moving visual stimulus. Arch Ophthalmol 52:952–941Google Scholar
  62. Wheeless L, Boynton R, Cohen G (1966) Eye movement responses to switch and pulse-switch stimuli. J Opt Soc Am 56:856–960Google Scholar
  63. Wylie SA, Stout JC, Bashore TR (2005) Activation of conflicting responses in Parkinson’s disease: evidence for degrading and facilitating effects on response time. Neuropsychologia 43:1033–1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prakash Joti
    • 1
  • Shrikanth Kulashekhar
    • 1
  • Madhuri Behari
    • 2
  • Aditya Murthy
    • 1
  1. 1.National Brain Research CentreManesarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Neurology, C.N. CentreAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations