Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 177, Issue 2, pp 223–232 | Cite as

Fixation offset facilitates saccades and manual reaching for single but not multiple target displays

Research Article

Abstract

Turning off a fixation point, typically for 200 ms, before the onset of a peripheral target substantially reduces saccadic reaction times. This facilitatory effect generated by an inserted temporal gap between fixation offset and the target appearance is called the “gap” effect [J Opt Soc Am 57:1030–1033, 1967]. We show that the gap reduces the initial latency of both saccades and manual pointing in single and multiple target displays. Yet, in multiple target displays, the gap increased the movement duration because eye or hand movements were frequently misdirected toward distractors so that the trajectory had to be corrected. Thus, in spite of the shortened latency, the total time for trial completion was not shortened in multiple target displays, whereas it was reduced in single target displays. This selective gap effect for a single target was not restricted to goal-directed motor tasks because perceptual discrimination tasks, where no motor response is required, also demonstrated the gap effect only for single target displays. Our results suggest that the gap may facilitate attentional disengagement, but it does not help target selection in motor and perceptual discrimination tasks, where the allocation of attention to the target is required.

Keywords

Gap effect Saccades Manual pointing Perceptual discrimination Attention 

References

  1. Arai K, McPeek RM, Keller EL (2004) Properties of saccadic responses in monkey when multiple competing visual stimuli are present. J Neurophysiol 91:890–900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekkering H, Pratt J, Abrams RA (1996) The gap effect for eye and hand movements. Percept Psychophys 58(4):628–635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bichot NP, Schall JD (1999) Effects of similarity and history on neural mechanisms of visual selection. Nat Neurosci 2:549–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bravo MJ, Nakayama K (1992) The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Percept Psychophys 51:465–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Castiello U (1999) Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action. Trends Cogn Sci 7:264–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corbetta M, Akbudak E, Conturo TE, Snyder AZ, Ollinger JM, Drury HA, Linenweber MR, Petersen SE, Raichle ME, Van Essen DC, Shulman GL (1998) A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron 21(4):761–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deubel H, Schneider WX (1996) Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Res 36:1827–1837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dorris MC, Munoz DP (1995) A neural correlated for the gap effect on saccadic reaction times in monkey. J Neurophysiol 73:2258–2562Google Scholar
  9. Fischer B (1987) The preparation of visually guided saccades. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 106:1–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer B, Breitmeyer B (1987) Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements. Neuropsychologia 25(1A):73–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer B, Ramsperger E (1984) Human express saccades: extremely short reaction times of goal directed eye movements. Exp Brain Res 57(1):191–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kingstone A, Klein R (1993) Visual offset facilitates saccadic latency: does pre-disengagement of visuo-spatial attention mediate this gap effect? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:1251–1265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kowler E, Anderson E, Dosher B, Blaser E (1995) The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Res 35:1897–1916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mackeben M, Nakayama K (1993) Express attentional shifts. Vision Res 33:85–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maljkovic V, Nakayama K (1994) Priming of popout: I. Role of features. Mem Cognit 22:657–672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mayfrank L, Mobashery M, Kimming H, Fischer B (1986) The role of fixation and visual attention in the occurrence of express saccades in man. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neural Sci 235:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McPeek RM, Han JH, Keller EL (2003) Competition between saccade goals in the superior colliculus produces saccade curvature. J Neurophysiol 89:2577–2590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McPeek RM, Keller EL (2001) Short-term priming, concurrent processing, and saccade curvature during a target selection task in the monkey. Vision Res 41(6):785–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McPeek RM, Keller EL (2002) Saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during a visual search task. J Neurophysiol 88:2019–2034PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McPeek RM, Keller EL (2004) Deficits in saccade target selection after inactivation of superior colliculus. Nat Neurosci 7:757–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McPeek RM, Maljkovic V, Nakayama K (1999) Saccades require focal attention and are facilitated by a short-term memory system. Vision Res 39:1555–1566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Munoz DP, Wurtz RH (1993) Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge. J Neurophysiol 70:559–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32:3–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pratt J, Bekkering H, Leung M (2000) Estimating the components of the gap effect. Exp Brain Res 130(2):258–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pratt J, Bekkering H, Abrams RA, Adam J (1999) The gap effect for spatially oriented responses. Acta Psychol 102:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pratt J, Nghiem T (2000) The role of the gap effect in the orienting of attention: evidence for express attentional shifts. Vis Cogn 5:629–644Google Scholar
  27. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Oonk H, Barnes L, Hughes HC (1995) Effects of warning signals and fixation point offsets on the latencies of pro- vs. anti- saccades: implications for an interpretation of the gap effect. Exp Brain Res 103:287–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saslow MG (1967) Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement. J Opt Soc Am 57:1030–1033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schall JD (2001) Neural basis of deciding, choosing, and acting. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:33–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schall JD, Thompson KG (1999) Neural selection and control of visually guided eye movements. Annu Rev Neurosci 22:241–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schiegg A, Deubel H, Schneider WX (2003) Attentional selection during preparation of prehension movements. Vis Cogn 10(4):409–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schneider WX, Deubel H (2002) Selection-for-perception and selection-for-spatial-motor-action are coupled by visual attention: a review of recent findings and new evidence from stimulus-driven saccade control. In: Prinz W, Hommel B (eds) Attention and performance XIX: common mechanisms in perception and action. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Sheliga BM, Riggio L, Craighero L, Rizzolatti G (1995) Spatial attention-determined modifications in saccade trajectories. Neuroreport 6:585–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Song J-H, Nakayama K (in press) Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually-guided manual pointing. J VisGoogle Scholar
  35. Tam W, Ono H (1994) Fixation disengagement and eyemovement latency. Percept Psychophys 56:251–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tipper SP, Lortie C, Baylis GC (1992) Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:891–905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weber H, Fischer B (1995) Gap duration and location of attention focus modulate the occurrence of left/right asymmetries in the saccadic reaction times of human subjects. Vision Res 35(7):987–998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Werner W (1993) Neurons in the primate superior colliculus are active before and during arm movements to visual targets. Eur J Neurosci 5:335–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations