Experimental Brain Research

, 176:23 | Cite as

Cognitive task effects on gait stability following concussion

  • Robert D. Catena
  • Paul van Donkelaar
  • Li-Shan Chou
Research Article


The purpose of this study was to determine how two different types of concurrent tasks affect gait stability in patients with concussion and how balance is maintained. Fourteen individuals suffering from a grade II concussion and 14 matched controls performed a single task of level walking and two types of concurrent tasks during level walking: a discrete reaction time task and a continuous sequential question and answer task. Common gait spatial/temporal measurements, whole-body center of mass motion, and the center of pressure trajectory were recorded. Concussed individuals demonstrated differences in gait while performing single-task level walking and while being challenged with a more difficult secondary task compared to normal controls. Concussed individuals adopted a slower, more conservative gait strategy to maintain stability, but still exhibited signs of instability with center of mass deviations in the coronal plane increasing by 13% during the question and answer dual-task and 26% more than control subjects. Trends of attentional deficits were present with the question and answer task, while the reaction time task seemed to help concussed individuals be more alert to their gait and stability. Recommendations for a sensitive testing protocol of deficits following concussion are explained.


Concussion Cognition Dual-task Attention Gait 



This study was supported by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (R49/CCR021735 and CCR023203). The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Louis R. Osternig, Tonya M. Parker and Sarah R. Everman.


  1. American Academy of Neurology (1997) Practice parameter: the management of concussion in sports [summary statement]. Neurology 48:581–585Google Scholar
  2. Bardy BG, Laurent M (1991) Visual cues and attention demand in locomotor positioning. Percept Mot Skills 72:915–926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell R, Hall RC (1977) The mental status examination. Am Fam Physician 16:145–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein DM (1999) Recovery from mild head injury. Brain Inj 13:151–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein DM (2002) Information processing difficulty long after self-reported concussion. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 8:673–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen A, Wenman R, Mickelborough J, Foster J, Hill E, Tallis R (2001) Dual-task effects of talking while walking on velocity and balance following a stroke. Age ageing 30:319–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown LA, Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH (1999) Attentional demands and postural recovery: the effects of aging. J Gerontol 54A:M165–M171Google Scholar
  8. Brukner P, Kahn K (2001) Clinical sports medicine. McGraw-Hill, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  9. CDC (1997) Sports-related recurrent brain injuries—United States. MMWR 46:224–227Google Scholar
  10. Chou L-S, Kaufman KR, Hahn ME, Brey RH (2003) Medio-lateral motion of the center of mass during obstacle crossing distinguishes elderly individuals with imbalance. Gait Posture 18:125–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chou L-S, Kaufman KR, Walker-Rabatin AE, Brey RH, Basford JR (2004) Dynamic instability during obstacle crossing following traumatic brain injury. Gait Posture 20:245–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cock J, Fordham C, Cockburn J, Haggard P (2003) Who knows best? Awareness of divided attention difficulty in a neurological rehabilitation setting. Brain Inj 17:561–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins MW, Lovell MR, McKeag DB (1999) Current issues in managing sports-related concussion. J Am Med Assoc 282:2283–2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Jong R (1995) Perception-action coupling and S-R compatibility. Acta Psychologica 90:287–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ebersbach G, Dimitrijevic MR, Poewe W (1995) Influence of concurrent tasks on gait: a dual-task approach. Percept Mot Skills 81:107–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gagnon I, Swaine B, Friedman D, Forget R (2004) Children show decreased dynamic balance after mild traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:444–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godefroy O, Lhullier-Lamy C, Rousseaux M (2002) SRT lengthening: role of an alertness deficit in frontal damaged patients. Neuropsychologia 40:2234–2241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guskiewicz KM, Weaver NL, Padua DA, Garrett WE Jr (2000) Epidemiology of concussion in collegiate and high school football players. Am J Sports Med 28:643–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Haaland KY, Temkin N, Randahl G, Dikmen S (1994) Recovery of simple motor skills after head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 16:448–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Haggard P, Cockburn J, Cock J, Fordham C, Wade D (2000) Interference between gait and cognitive tasks in a rehabilitating neurological population. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 69:479–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hahn ME, Chou L-S (2004) Age-related reduction in sagittal plane center of mass motion during obstacle crossing. J Biomech 37:837–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halterman CI, Langan J, Drew A, Rodriguez E, Osternig LR, Chou LS, van Donkelaar P (2006) Tracking the recovery of visuospatial attention deficits in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain 129(Pt) 3:747–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahneman D (1973) Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaya BK, Krebs DE, Riley PO (1998) Dynamic stability in elders: momentum control in locomotor ADL. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 53:M126–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Krauss JK, Tränkle R, Kopp KH (1997) Posttraumatic movement disorders after moderate or mild head injury. Mov Disord 12:428–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M (1993) Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Exp Brain Res 97:139–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maki BE (1997) Gait changes in older adults: predictors of falls or indicators of fear. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:313–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McCrea M, Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, Barr W, Randolph C, Cantu RC, Onate JA, Yang J, Kelly JP (2003) Acute effects and recovery time following concussion in collegiate football players: the NCAA concussion study. JAMA 290:2556–2563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McFadyen BJ, Swaine B, Dumas D, Durand A (2003) Residual effects of a traumatic brain injury on locomotor capacity: a first study of spatiotemporal patterns during unobstructed and obstructed walking. J Head Trauma Rehabil 18:512–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mrazik M, Ferrara MS, Peterson CL, Elliott RE, Courson RW, Clanton MD, Hynd GW (2000) Injury severity and neuropsychological and balance outcomes of four college athletes. Brain Inj 14:921–931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parker TM, Osternig LR, Lee H-J, van Donkelaar P, Chou L-S (2005) The effect of divided attention on gait stability following concussion. Clin Biomech 20:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pashler H (1990) Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? J Exp Psychol 16:826–842Google Scholar
  33. Slobounov S, Sebastianelli W, Simon R (2002) Neurophysiological and behavioral concomitants of mild brain injury in collegiate athletes. Clin Neurophysiol 113:185–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thurman D, Alverson C, Dunn K, Guerrero J, Sniezek J (1999) Traumatic brain injury in the United States: a public health perspective. J Head Trauma Rehabil 14:602–615PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Vallis LA, Patla AE (2004) Expected and unexpected head yaw movements result in different modification of gait and whole body coordination strategies. Exp Brain Res 157:94–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. van Donkelaar P, Langan J, Rodriguez E, Drew A, Halterman C, Osternig LR, Chou L-S (2005) Attentional deficits in concussion. Brain Injury (in press)Google Scholar
  37. van Donkelaar P, Osternig LR, Chou L-S (2006) Attentional and biomechanical deficits interact after mild traumatic brain injury. Exercise and Sport Science Review 34 (in press)Google Scholar
  38. Weerdesteyn V, Schillings AM, van Galen GP, Duysens J (2003) Distraction affects the performance of obstacle avoidance during walking. J Mot Behav 35:53–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Woltring HJ (1986) A FORTRAN package for generalized, cross-validatory spline smoothing and differentiation. Advances in Engineering Software 8:104–113Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert D. Catena
    • 1
  • Paul van Donkelaar
    • 2
  • Li-Shan Chou
    • 1
  1. 1.Motion Analysis Laboratory, Department of Human Physiology1240 University of OregonEugeneUSA
  2. 2.Eye Hand Laboratory, Department of Human PhysiologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations