Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 173, Issue 2, pp 291–297 | Cite as

Immunoreactivities to protein gene product 9.5, neurofilament protein and neuron specific enolase in the ovary of the sexually immature ostrich (Struthio camelus)

Research Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The innervation of the ovary has been studied in various species of birds and mammals. Despite the fact that the innervation of any organ is an essential factor in controlling its growth and function, no information is available on the distribution of nerve fibers in the ovary of the sexually immature ostrich. Thus, the present study was undertaken to investigate the distribution of nerve fibers in the ovary of the sexually immature ostrich, using antibodies against neurofilament protein type M of 160 kD (NP), protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5) and neuron specific enolase (NSE). A total of 26 sexually immature female ostriches, aged between 12 and 14 months were used in the present study. Immunostaining was performed using a LSAB plus kit (Dakocytomation, Denmark). Antibodies against NP and PGP 9.5 were used at dilutions of 1:25 and 1:50, respectively. A ready-to-use solution containing antibodies against NSE was also used. Strong immunostaining for NP, PGP 9.5 and NSE was observed in nerve bundles, which coursed through the ovarian stalk and extended into the medulla and cortex. In addition, NSE immunoreactive nerve cell bodies were observed in the cortex and medulla. NP, PGP 9.5 and NSE immunoreactive nerve fibers were present in the thecal layer of the follicular wall. The current study has highlighted the distribution of NP, PGP 9.5 and NSE-immunoreactive nerve fibers in the ovary of the sexually immature ostrich. The findings of the present study suggest that the distribution of nerve fibers in the immature ostrich is similar to that of the domestic fowl.

Keywords

Protein gene product 9.5 Neurofilament protein Neuron specific enolase Immunoreactivity Immature ostrich 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Amanuma A, Yamada K (1979) Innervation of the ovarian interstitial cell of the chick embryo. Experientia 35:403–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anesetti G, Lombide P, D’albora H, Ojeda SR (2001) Intrinsic neurons in the human ovary. Cell Tiss Res 306:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avila RE, Samar ME, De fabro SP (1991) Interstitial cells of the ovaries of the chick embryo: ultrastructural aspects of their innervation. Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba 49:13–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bae S-E, Corcoran BM, Watson ED (2001a) Organisation of uterine innervation in the mare: distribution of immunoreactivities for the general neuronal markers protein gene product 9.5 and PAN-N. Equine Vet J 33:323–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bae S-E, Corcoran BM, Watson ED (2001b) Immunohistochemical study of the distribution of adrenergic and peptidergic innervation in the equine uterus and cervix. Reprodruction 122:275–282Google Scholar
  6. Bodis J, Tinneberg HR, Torok A, Cledon P, Hanf V, Papenfuss F (1993) Effect of noradrenaline and dopamine on progesterone and estradiol secretion of human granulosa cells. Acta Endocrinol (Copenhagen) 129:165–168Google Scholar
  7. Bodis J, Koppan M, Kornya L, Tinneberg HR, Torok A (2002) The effect of catecholamines, acetylcholine and histamine on progesterone release by human granulosa cells in a granulosa cell superfusion system. Gyn Endocrinol 16:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahl E (1970) Studies of the fine structure of ovarian interstitial tissue. 3. The innervation of the thecal gland of the domestic fowl. Z Zellforsch 109:212–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Albora H, Barcia JJ (1996) Intrinsic neuronal cell bodies in the rat ovary. Neurosci Let 205:65–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Albora H, Lombide P, Ojeda SR (2000) Intrinsic neurons in the rat ovary: an immunohistochemical study. Cell Tiss Res 300:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dees WL, Hiney JK, Schultea TD, Mayerhofer A, Danilchik M, Dissen GA, Ojeda SR (1995) The primate ovary contains a population of catecholaminergic neuron-like cells expressing nerve growth factor receptors. Endocrinology 136:5760–5768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doran JF, Jackson P, Kynoch PAM, Thompson RJ (1983) Isolation of PGP 9.5, a new human neurone-specific protein detected by high-resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis. J Neurochem 40:1542–1547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fritz S, Wessler I, Breitling R, Rossmanith W, Ojeda SR, Dissen GA, Amsterdam A, Mayerhofer A (2001) Expression of muscarinic receptor types in the primate ovary and evidence for nonneuronal acetylcholine synthesis. J Clin Endocrinol Met 86:349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilbert AB (1968) Innervation of the avian ovary. In: Proceedings of the Physiological Society, Royal Veterinary College meeting. pp 4p–5pGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilbert AB (1969) Innervation of the ovary of the domestic hen. Q J Exp Physiol 54:404–411Google Scholar
  16. Gilbert AB (1979) Female genital organs. In: King AS, McLelland J (eds) Form and function in birds, vol 1. Academic, London, pp 237–360Google Scholar
  17. Jackson P, Thomson VM, Thompson RJ (1985) A comparison of the evolutionary distribution of the two neuroendocrine markers, neuron-specific enolase and protein gene product 9.5. J Neurochem 45:185–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kannisto P, Owman C, Rosengren E, Walles B (1984) Intraovarian adrenergic nerves in the guinea-pig: development from fetal life to sexual maturity. Cell Tiss Res 238:235–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kornya L, Bodis J, Koppan M, Tinneberg HR, Torok A (2001) Modulatory effect of acetylcholine on gonadotropin-stimulated human granulosa cell steroid secretion. Gyn Obst Invest 52:104–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lakomy M, Doboszynska T, Szteyn S (1983) Adrenergic nerves in organs of the reproductive system of sexually immature pigs. Anat Anz 154:149–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Marangos PJ, Zis AP, Clark RL, Goodwin FK (1978) Neuronal, non-neuronal and hybrid forms of enolase in brain: structural, immunological and functional comparisons. Brain Res 150:117–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mayerhofer A, Fritz S (2002) Ovarian acetylcholine and muscarinic receptors: hints of a novel intrinsic ovarian regulatory system. Microsc Res Tech 59:503–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muller-Marschhausen U, Grothe C, Kaveri S, Strosberg AD, Verhofstad AA, Unsicker K (1988) Catecholaminergic nerves in the embryonic chick ovary: co-localization with beta 2-adrenoceptor-bearing steroidogenic cells. Cell Tiss Res 254:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohara O, Gahara Y, Miyake T, Teraoka H, Kitamura T (1993) Neurofilament deficiency in quail caused by nonsense mutation in neurofilament-L gene. J Cell Biol 121:387–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perry MM, Gilbert AB, Evans AJ (1978) Electron microscope observations on the ovarian follicle of the domestic fowl during the rapid growth phase. J Anat 125:481–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmechel D, Marangos PJ, Brightman M (1978) Neuron-specific enolase is a molecular marker for peripheral and central neuroendocrine cells. Nature 276:834–836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sporrong B, Kannisto P, Owman C, Sjoberg N-O, Walles B (1985) Histochemistry and ultrastructure of adrenergic and acetylcholinesterase-containing nerves supplying follicles and endocrine cells in the guinea-pig ovary. Cell Tiss Res 240:505–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stefenson A, Owman C, Sjoberg N-O, Sporrong B, Walles B (1981) Comparative study of the autonomic innervation of the mammalian ovary, with particular regard to the follicular system. Cell Tiss Res 215:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stjernquist M (1996) Innervation of ovarian and testicular cells. In: Unsicker K (eds) Autonomic-endocrine interactions. Amsterdam, Harwood, pp 231–256Google Scholar
  30. Thompson RJ, Kynoch PAM, Sarjant J (1981) Immunohistochemical localization of creatine kinase-BB isoenzyme to astrocytes in human brain. Brain Res 201:423–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Unsicker K, Seidel F, Hofmann HD, Muller TH, Schmidt R, Wilson A (1983) Catecholaminergic innervation of the chicken ovary. With special reference to the follicular wall. Cell Tiss Res 230:431–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weber K, Shaw G, Osborn M, Debus E, Geisler N (1983) Neurofilaments, a subclass of intermediated filaments; structure and expression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 47:717–729Google Scholar
  33. Wilson POG, Barber PC, Hamid QA, Power BF, Dhillon AP, Rode J, Days INM, Thompson RJ, Polak JM (1988) The immunolocalization of protein gene product 9.5 using rabbit polyclonal and mouse monoclonal antibodies. Bri J Exp Path 69:91–104Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Veterinary AnatomySokoine University of AgricultureMorogoroTanzania
  2. 2.Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary ScienceUniversity of PretoriaOnderstepoortRepublic of South Africa

Personalised recommendations