Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 171, Issue 2, pp 278–282 | Cite as

Temporal uncertainty does not affect response latencies of movements produced during startle reactions

  • Erin K. Cressman
  • Anthony N. Carlsen
  • Romeo Chua
  • Ian M. Franks
Research Note


Previous research has shown that a startle ‘go’ stimulus, presented at a constant latency with respect to a warning stimulus, is capable of eliciting an intended voluntary movement in a simple reaction time (RT) task at very short latencies without involvement of the cerebral cortex (Carlsen et al. in Exp Brain Res 152:510–518, 2003; J Motor Behav 36:253–264, 2004a; Exp Brain Res 159:301–309 2004b; Valls-Solé et al. in J Physiol 516:931–938, 1999). The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the effect of temporal uncertainty on response latency during an RT task that comprised a startle stimulus. Participants were required to perform an active 20° wrist extension movement in response to an auditory tone that was presented 2,500 to 5,500 ms after a warning stimulus, in 1,000 ms increments. On certain trials the control auditory stimulus (80 dB) was unexpectedly replaced by the startle stimulus (124 dB). When participants were startled the intended voluntary movement was initiated at approximately 70 ms, regardless of foreperiod duration. The magnitude and invariance of response latencies to the startle stimulus suggest that the intended movement had indeed been prepared prior to the arrival of the imperative go stimulus, within 2.5 s of the warning stimulus. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the prepared movement decayed over a period of at least 3 s.


Reaction time Startle Variable foreperiod Motor preparation 



This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) awarded to I.M.F.


  1. Brown P, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Britton TC, Day BL, Marsden CD (1991) New observations on the normal auditory startle reflex in man. Brain 114:1891–1902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunia CHM (1983) Motor preparation: changes in amplitude of Achilles tendon reflexes during a fixed foreperiod of one second. Psychophysiol 20:658–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlsen AN, Chua R, Inglis JT, Sanderson DJ, Franks IM (2003) Startle response is dishabituated during a reaction time task. Exp Brain Res 152:510–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlsen AN, Chua R, Inglis JT, Sanderson DJ, Franks IM (2004a) Prepared movements are elicited early by startle. J Motor Behav 36:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlsen AN, Chua R, Inglis JT, Sanderson DJ, Franks IM (2004b) Can prepared responses be stored subcortically? Exp Brain Res 159:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis M (1984) The mammalian startle response. In: Eaton RC (ed) Neural mechanisms of startle behavior. Plenum, New York, pp 287–351Google Scholar
  7. Drazin D (1961) Effects of foreperiod, foreperiod variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time. J Exp Psychol 62:43–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jaskowski P, Verleger R (1993) A clock paradigm to study the relationship between expectancy and response force. Percept Motor Skill 77:163–174Google Scholar
  9. Klemmer ET (1956) Time uncertainty in simple reaction time. J Exp Psychol 51:179–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kumru H, Valls-Solé J (2006) Excitability of the pathways mediating the startle reaction before execution of a voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res 169:427–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mattes S, Ulrich R (1997) Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli. Percept Psychophys 59:1089–1097PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mowrer OH (1940) Preparatory set (expectancy)—some methods of measurement. Psychol Monogr 52Google Scholar
  13. Muller-Gethmann H, Ulrich R, Rinkenauer G (2003) Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiol 40:597–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Niemi P, Naatanen R (1981) Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychol Bull 89:133–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Quesada DC, Schmidt RA (1970) A test of the Adams–Creamer decay hypothesis for the timing of motor responses. J Motor Behav 2:273–283Google Scholar
  16. Scott BW, Frankland PW, Li L, Yeomans JS (1999) Cochlear and trigeminal systems contributing to the startle reflex in rats. Neuroscience 91:1565–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Valls-Solé J, Rothwell JC, Goulart F, Cossu G, Munoz JE (1999) Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans. J Physiol 516:931–938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yeomans JS, Frankland PW (1996) The acoustic startle reflex: neurons and connections. Br Res Rev 21:301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin K. Cressman
    • 1
  • Anthony N. Carlsen
    • 1
  • Romeo Chua
    • 1
  • Ian M. Franks
    • 1
  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations