Experimental Brain Research

, 173:698 | Cite as

Visuomotor representation decay: influence on motor systems

  • Tyler M. Rolheiser
  • Gordon Binsted
  • Kyle J. Brownell
Research Article

Abstract

The contribution of ventral stream information to the variability of movement has been the focus of much attention, and has provided numerous researchers with conflicting results. These results have been obtained through the use of discrete pointing movements, and as such, do not offer any explanation regarding how ventral stream information contributes to movement variability over time. The present study examined the contribution of ventral stream information to movement variability in three tasks: Hand-only movement, eye-only movement, and an eye–hand coordinated task. Participants performed a continuous reciprocal tapping task to two point-of-light targets for 10 s. The targets were visible for the first 5 s, at which point vision of the targets was removed. Movement variability was similar in all conditions for the initial 5-s interval. The no-vision condition (final 5 s) can be summarized as follows: ventral stream information contributed to an initial significant increase in variability across motor systems, though the different motor systems were able to preserve ventral information integrity differently. The results of these studies can be attributed to the behavioral and cortical networks that underlie the saccadic and manual motor systems.

Keywords

Dorsal Ventral Saccade Pointing Continuous 

References

  1. Batista AP, Buneo CA, Snyder LH, Anderson RA (1999) Reach plans in eye-centered coordinates. Science 285:257–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binsted G, Elliott D (1999a) Ocular perturbations and retinal/extraretinal information: the coordination of saccadic and manual movements. Exp Brain Res 127:193–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binsted G, Elliott D (1999b) The muller-lyer illusion as a perturbation to the saccadic system. Hum Mov Sci 18:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binsted G, Chua R, Helsen W, Elliott D (2001) Eye–hand coordination in goal-directed aiming. Hum Mov Sci 20:563–585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binsted G, Rolheiser TM, Chua R (2006) Decay in visuomotor representations during manual aiming. J Motor Behav (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Bryden MP (1977) Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia 15:617–624Google Scholar
  7. Dankert J, Goodale MA (2001) Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field. Exp Brain Res 137:303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. van Donkelaar P (1998) Saccade amplitude influences pointing movement kinematics. Neuroreport 9:2015–2018PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. van Donkelaar P, Lee JH, Drew AS (2002a) Eye–hand interactions differ in the human premotor and parietal cortices. Hum Mov Sci 21:377–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. van Donkelaar P, Lee JH, Drew AS (2002b) Cortical frames of reference for eye–hand coordination. Prog Brain Res 140:301–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. van Donkelaar P, Siu KC, Walterschied J (2004) Saccadic output is influenced by limb kinetics during eye–hand coordination. J Motor Behav 36(3):245–252Google Scholar
  12. Elliott D, Madalena J (1987) The Influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. Q J Exp Psychol 39:541–559Google Scholar
  13. Elliott D, Helsen WF, Chua R (2001) A century later: Woodworth’s two-compartment model of goal-directed aiming. Psychol Bull 127(3):342–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaveau V, Martin O, Prablanc C, Pelisson D, Urquizar C, Desmurget M (2003) Online modification of saccadic eye movements by retinal signals. Neuroreport 14:875–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glover S (2004) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behav Brain Sci 27:3–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldberg ME, Eggers HM, Gouras P (2000) The oculomotor system. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM (eds) Principles of neural science. McGraw-Hill Publishers, New York, pp 660–678Google Scholar
  17. Goodale MA, Haffenden A (1998) Frames of reference for perception and action in the human visual system. Neurosci Behav Rev 22(2):161–172Google Scholar
  18. Heath M, Westwood DA, Binsted G (2004) The control of memory-guided reaching movements in peripersonal space. Motor Control 8:76–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Marconi B, Genovesio A, Battaglia-Mayer A, Ferraina S, Suartito S, Molinari M, Lacquaniti F, Caminiti R (2001) Eye–hand coordination during reaching. Anatomical relationships between parietal and frontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 11:513–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McIntyre J, Stratta F, Lacquaniti F (1998) Short-term memory for reaching to visual targets: psychological evidence for body-centered reference frames. J Neurosci 18:8423–8435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Munoz DP, Fecteau JH (2002) Vying for dominance: dynamic interactions control visual fixation and saccadic initiation in the superior colliculus. Prog Brain Res 140:3–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nyffeler T, Pierrot-Deseillingy C, Pflugshaupt T, von Wartburg R, Hess C, Muri RM (2004) Information processing in long delay memory-guided saccades: further insight from TMS. Exp Brain Res 154:109–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saron CD, Schroeder CE, Foxe JJ, Vaughan HG Jr (2001) Visual activation of frontal cortex: segregation from occipital activity. Cogn Brain Res 12:75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thompson JA (1983) Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 9:427–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Westwood DA, Goodale MA (2003) Perceptual illusion and the real time control of action. Spat Vis 16(3–4):243–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Westwood DA, Heath M, Roy EA (2003) No evidence for accurate visuomotor memory: systematic and variable error in memory-guided reaching. J Motor Behav 35(2):127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tyler M. Rolheiser
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gordon Binsted
    • 1
  • Kyle J. Brownell
    • 1
  1. 1.College of KinesiologyUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Human Physiology1240 University of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations