Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 166, Issue 3–4, pp 583–591 | Cite as

The role of long-term and short-term familiarity in visual and haptic face recognition

Research Article

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that the familiarity of a face leads to more robust recognition, at least within the visual domain. The aim of our study was to investigate whether face familiarity resulted in a representation of faces that was easily shared across the sensory modalities. In Experiment 1, we tested whether haptic recognition of a highly familiar face (one’s own face) was as efficient as visual recognition. Our observers were unable to recognise their own face models from tactile memory alone but were able to recognise their faces visually. However, haptic recognition improved when participants were primed by their own live face. In Experiment 2, we found that short-term familiarisation with a set of previously unfamiliar face stimuli improved crossmodal recognition relative to the recognition of unfamiliar faces. Our findings suggest that familiarisation provides a strong representation of faces but that the nature of the information encoded during learning is critical for efficient crossmodal recognition.

Keywords

Face recognition Haptics Vision Face familiarity 

References

  1. Brady N, Campbell M, Flaherty M (2004) My left brain and me: a dissociation in the perception of the self and others. Neuropsychologia 42(9):1156–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruce V (1986) Influences of familiarity on the processing of faces. Perception 15:387–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruce V, Valentine T (1985) Identity priming in the recognition of familiar faces. Br J Psychol 76:373–383Google Scholar
  4. Bruce V, Young AW (1998) In the eye of the beholder: the science of face perception. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruce V, Henderson Z, Hancock P, Burton AM, Miller P (1999) Verification of face identities from face images captured on video. J Exp Psychol App 5(4):339–360Google Scholar
  6. Bruce V, Henderson Z, Newman C, Burton AM (2001) Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. J Exp Psychol Appl 7(3):207–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bülthoff I, Newell FN (2004) Categorical perception of sex occurs in familiar but not unfamiliar faces. Vis Cogn 11(7):823–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burton AM, Wilson S, Cowan M, Bruce V (1999) Face recognition in poor quality video: evidence from security surveillance. Psychol Sci 10:243–248Google Scholar
  9. Clutterbuck R, Johnston RA (2002) Exploring levels of face familiarity by using an indirect face matching task. Perception 31(8):985–994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards MG, Wing AM, Stevens J, Humphreys GW (2005) Knowing your nose better than your thumb: measures of over-grasp reveal that face-parts are special for grasping. Exp Brain Res 161(1):72–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Moylan J, Anderson A, Skudlarski P, Gore JC (2000) Does visual subordinate-level categorisation engage the functionally defined fusiform face area? In: Kanwisher N, Moscovich M (eds) The cognitive neuroscience of face processing. Psychology Press, Hove, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Hancock JB, Bruce V, Burton AM (2000) Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends Cogn Sci 4(9):330–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill H, Schyns PG, Akamatsu S (1997) Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition. Cognition 62:201–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnston A, Hill H, Carman N (1992) Recognising faces: effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception 21:365–375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kanwisher N (2000) Domain specificity in face perception. Nat Neurosci 3(8):759–763CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanwisher N, Moscovitch M (2000) The cognitive neuroscience of face processing. Psychology Press, Hove, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Katanoda K, Yoshikawa K, Sugishita M (2000) Neural substrates for the recognition of newly learned faces: a functional MRI study. Neuropsychologia 38:1616–1625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Keenan JP, Nelson AM, Pascual Leone A (2001) Self recognition and the right hemisphere. Nature 409:305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kilgour AR, Lederman SJ (2002) Face recognition by hand. Percept Psychophys 64:339–352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kilgour AR, de Gelder B, Lederman SJ (2004) Haptic face recognition and prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia 42:707–712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kircher TT, Senior C, Phillips ML, Benson PJ, Bullmore ET, Brammer M, Simmons A, Williams SC, Bartels M, David AS (2000) Towards a functional neuroanatomy of self processing: effects of faces and words. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 10(1–2):133–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Leube DT, Erb M, Grodd W, Bartels M, Kircher TJ (2003) Successful episodic memory retrieval of newly learned faces activates a left frontoparietal network. Cogn Brain Res 18:97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Newell FN, Chiroro P, Valentine T (1999) Recognising unfamiliar faces: the effects of distinctiveness and view. Q J Exp Psychol 52A(2):509–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newell FN, Ernst MO, Tjan BS, Bülthoff HH (2001) Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychol Sci 12:37–42Google Scholar
  25. O’Toole AJ, Edelman S, Bülthoff H (1998) Stimulus-specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint. Vis Res 38:2351–2363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Peterson MA, Rhodes G (2003) Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: analytic and holistic processes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Platek SM, Keenan JP, Gallup GG Jr, Mohamed FB (2004) Where am I? The neurological correlates of self and other. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 19(2):114–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rakoner SS, Cahlon B (2003) Face recognition: cognitive and computational processes. John Benjamins, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  29. Reales JM, Ballesteros S (1999) Implicit and explicit memory for visual and haptic objects: crossmodal priming depends on structural descriptions. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25:644–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rock I, Harris CS (1967) Vision and touch. Sci Am 216:96–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwaninger A, Lobmaier JS, Collishaw SM (2002) Role of featural and configurational information in familiar and unfamiliar face recognition. Lec Notes Comp Sci 2525:643–650Google Scholar
  32. Tanaka JW, Farah MJ (1993) Parts and wholes in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol 46A:225–245Google Scholar
  33. Tanaka JW, Sengco J (1997) Features and their configuration in face recognition. Mem Cogn 25:583–592Google Scholar
  34. Tarr MJ, Cheng YD (2003) Learning to see faces in objects. Trends Cogn Sci 7(1):23–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tarr MJ, Gauthier I (2000) FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nat Neurosci 3(8):764–769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Troje NF, Bülthoff HH (1996) Face recognition under varying pose: the role of texture and shape. Vis Res 36:1761–1771CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Turk DJ, Heatherton TF, Kelly WM, Funnell MG, Gazzaniga MS, Macrae CN (2002) Mike or me? Self recognition in a split-brain patient. Nat Neurosci 5(9):841–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Welch RB, Warren DH (1980) Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychol Bull 88(3):638–667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Yip AW, Sinha P (2002) Contribution of colour to face recognition. Perception 31(8):995–1003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Young AW, Hay DC, McWeeny KH, Flude BM, Ellis AW (1985) Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception 14(6):737–746PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Trinity CollegeInstitute of NeuroscienceDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations