Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 166, Issue 3–4, pp 402–410 | Cite as

Spatial tuning of tactile attention modulates visual processing within hemifields: an ERP investigation of crossmodal attention

  • Martin EimerEmail author
  • José van Velzen
Research Article

Abstract

Recent event-related brain potential (ERP) studies have revealed crossmodal links in spatial attention, but have not yet investigated differences in the spatial tuning of attention between task-relevant and irrelevant modalities. We studied the spatial distribution of attention in vision under conditions where participants were instructed to attend to the left or right-hand in order to detect infrequent targets, and to entirely ignore visual stimuli presented via LEDs at two eccentricities in the left or right hemifield. Hands were located close to two of these four LEDs in different blocks. Visual N1 amplitudes were enhanced when visual stimuli in the cued hemifield were close to the attended hand, relative to visual stimuli presented at the other location on the same side. These within-hemifield attentional modulations of visual processing demonstrate that crossmodal attention is not distributed diffusely across an entire hemifield. The spatial tuning of tactile attention transfers crossmodally to affect vision, consistent with spatial selection at a multimodal level of representation.

Keywords

Attention Crossmodal Vision Touch Event-related brain potentials 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Programme grant from the Medical Research Council (UK). M.E. holds a Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award. The authors thank Kausar Turabi and Heijo van de Werf for technical assistance.

References

  1. Eimer M (2001) Crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision, audition, and touch: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia 39:1292–1303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Eimer M, Driver J (2000) An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch. Psychophysiology 37:697–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Eimer M, Driver J (2001) Crossmodal links in endogenous and exogenous spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potential studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25:497–511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Eimer M, Forster B (2003) Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention. Exp Brain Res 151:24–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Eimer M, Schröger E (1998) ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. Psychophysiology 35:313–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eimer M, Van Velzen J, Driver J (2002) Crossmodal interactions between audition, touch and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations. J Cogn Neurosci 14:254–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Eimer M, Van Velzen J, Driver J (2004) ERP evidence for crossmodal audio-visual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields. J Cogn Neurosci 16:272–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Farah MJ, Wong AB, Monheit MA, Morrow LA (1989) Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: modality–specific or supramodal? Neuropsychologia 27:461–470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferlazzo F, Couyoumdjian A, Padovani T, Belardinelli MO (2002) Head-centred meridian effect on auditory spatial attention orienting. Q J Exp Psychol 55A:937–963Google Scholar
  10. García-Larrea L, Lukaszewicz AC, Mauguière F (1995) Somatosensory responses during selective spatial attention: the N120-to-N140 transition. Psychophysiology 32:526–537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hillyard SA, Simpson GV, Woods DL, Van Voorhis S, Münte TF (1984) Event-related brain potentials and selective attention to different modalities. In: Reinoso-Suarez F, Ajmone-Marsan C (eds) Cortical integration. Raven Press, New York, pp 395–414Google Scholar
  12. Hötting K, Röder B, Rösler F (2003) Crossmodal and intermodal attention modulates event-related brain potentials to tactile and auditory stimuli. Exp Brain Res 148:26–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kennett S, Eimer M, Spence C, Driver J (2001) Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs. J Cogn Neurosci 13:462–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McDonald JJ, Ward LM (2000) Involuntary listening aids seeing: evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychol Sci 11:167–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. McDonald JJ, Teder-Sälejärvi WA, Hillyard SA (2000) Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception. Nature 407:906–908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Michie PT, Bearpark HM, Crawford JM, Glue LCT (1987) The effects of spatial selective attention on the somatosensory event-related potential. Psychophysiology 24:449–463PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Spence C, Driver J (1997) Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial attention. Percept Psychophys 59:1–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Teder-Sälejärvi WA, Münte TF, Sperlich FJ, Hillyard SA (1999) Intra-modal and cross-modal spatial attention to auditory and visual stimuli: an event-related brain potential (ERP) study. Cogn Brain Res 8:327–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ward LM (1994) Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention. Can J Exp Psychol 48:242–259PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Birkbeck CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations