Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 166, Issue 3–4, pp 345–357

Odor/taste integration and the perception of flavor

Review

Abstract

Perceptions of the flavors of foods or beverages reflect information derived from multiple sensory afferents, including gustatory, olfactory, and somatosensory fibers. Although flavor perception therefore arises from the central integration of multiple sensory inputs, it is possible to distinguish the different modalities contributing to flavor, especially when attention is drawn to particular sensory characteristics. Nevertheless, our experiences of the flavor of a food or beverage are also simultaneously of an overall unitary perception. Research aimed at understanding the mechanisms behind this integrated flavor perception is, for the most part, relatively recent. However, psychophysical, neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies on cross-modal sensory interactions involved in flavor perception have started to provide an understanding of the integrated activity of sensory systems that generate such unitary perceptions, and hence the mechanisms by which these signals are “functionally united when anatomically separated”. Here we review this recent research on odor/taste integration, and propose a model of flavor processing that depends on prior experience with the particular combination of sensory inputs, temporal and spatial concurrence, and attentional allocation. We propose that flavor perception depends upon neural processes occurring in chemosensory regions of the brain, including the anterior insula, frontal operculum, orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, as well as upon the interaction of this chemosensory “flavor network” with other heteromodal regions including the posterior parietal cortex and possibly the ventral lateral prefrontal cortex.

References

  1. Algom D, Cain WS (1991) Chemosensory representation in perception and memory. In: Bolanowski SJ, Gescheider GA (eds) Ratio scaling of psychological magnitude. Hillsdale. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, N.J., pp 183–198Google Scholar
  2. Algom D, Marks LE, Cain WS (1993) Memory psychophysics for chemosensation: perceptual and mental mixtures of odor and taste. Chem Senses 18:151–160Google Scholar
  3. Anderson AK, Christoff K, Stappen I, Panitz D, Ghahremani DG, Glover G, Gabrieli JDE, Sobel N (2003) Dissociated neural representations of intensity and valence in human olfaction. Nat Neurosci 6:196–202Google Scholar
  4. de Araujo E, Rolls ET (2004) Representation in the human brain of food texture and oral fat. J Neurosci 24:3086–3093Google Scholar
  5. de Araujo E, Rolls ET, Kringelbach ML, McGlone F, Phillips N (2003) Taste-olfactory conergence and the representation of the pleasantness of flavor in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci 18:2059–2068Google Scholar
  6. von Bekesy G (1964) Olfactory analogue to directional hearing. J Appl Physiol 19:369–373Google Scholar
  7. Bengtsson S, Berglund H, Gulyas B, Cohen E, Savic I (2001) Brain activation during odor perception in males and females. Neuroreport 12:2027–2033Google Scholar
  8. Bingham AF, Birch GG, de Graaf C, Behan JM, Perring KD (1990) Sensory studies with sucrose-maltol mixtures. Chem Senses 15:447–456Google Scholar
  9. Breslin PAS, Belanger MA, Tharp CD, Dalton P (2003) Learned flavor congruency: the importance of experience in the sub-threshold integration of tastant/odorant pairings. Paper presented at the Pangborn Symposium, Boston, July 20–24Google Scholar
  10. Burdach KJ, Kroeze JHA, Koster EP (1984) Nasal retronasal and gustatory perception: an experimental comparison. Percept Psychophys 36:205–208Google Scholar
  11. Bushara KO, Grafman J, Hallet M (2001) Neural correlates of auditory-visual stimulus onset asynchrony detection. J Neurosci 21:300–304Google Scholar
  12. Bushara KO, Hanakawa T, Immisch I, Toma K, Kanasaku K, Hallet M (2003) Neural correlates of cross-modal binding. Nat Neurosci 6:190–195Google Scholar
  13. Calvert GA (2001) Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex 11:1110–1123Google Scholar
  14. Calvert GA, Campbell R (2003) Reading speech from still and moving faces: the neural substrates of visible speech. J Cogn Neurosci 15:57–70Google Scholar
  15. Calvert GA, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Campbell R, Williams SC, McGuire PK, Woodruff PW, Iversen SD, David AS (1997) Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science 276:593–596Google Scholar
  16. Calvert GA, Brammer MJ, Iversen SD (1998) Crossmodal identification. Trends Cogn Sci 2:247–253Google Scholar
  17. Calvert GA, Brammer MJ, Bullmore ET, Campbell R, Iversen SD, David AS (1999) Response amplification in sensory-specific cortices during crossmodal binding. Neuroreport 10:2619–2623Google Scholar
  18. Calvert GA, Campbell R, Brammer MJ (2000) Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. Curr Biol 10:649–657Google Scholar
  19. Calvert GA, Hansen PC, Iversen SD, Brammer MJ (2001) Detection of audio-visual integration sites in humans by application of electrophysiological criteria to the BOLD effect. Neuroimage 14:427–438Google Scholar
  20. Cerf B, Lebihan D, Van de Moortele PF, MacLeod P, Faurion A (1998) Functional lateralization of human gustatory cortex related to handedness disclosed by fMRI study. Ann N Y Acad Sci 855:575–578Google Scholar
  21. Cerf-Ducastel B, Murphy C (2001) fMRI activation in response to odorants orally delivered in aqueous solutions. Chem Senses 26:625–637Google Scholar
  22. Cerf-Ducastel B, Van de Moortele PF, MacLeod P, Le Bihan D, Faurion A (2001) Interaction of gustatory and lingual somatosensory perceptions at the cortical level in the human: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Chem Senses 26:371–383Google Scholar
  23. Clark CC, Lawless HT (1994) Limiting response alternatives in time-intensity scaling: an examination of the halo-dumping effect. Chem Senses 19:583–594Google Scholar
  24. Cliff M, Nobel AC (1990) Time-intensity evaluation of sweetness and fruitiness and their interaction in a model solution. J Food Sci 55:450–454Google Scholar
  25. Cytowic RE (2002) Synesthesia: a union of the senses. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Dalton P, Doolittle N, Nagata H, Breslin PAS (2000) The merging of the senses: integration of subthreshold taste and smell. Nat Neurosci 3:431–432Google Scholar
  27. Delwiche JF, Heffelfinger AL (2003) Cross-modal additivity of taste and smell. Paper presented at Association for Chemoreception Sciences, Sarasota, USA, April 9–13, 2003Google Scholar
  28. Djordjevic J, Abrol K, Perreau E, Lakdawalla Z, Boyle J, Zatorre R, Jones-Gotman M (2003) Odor-induced changes in taste perception. Paper presented at Association for Chemoreception Sciences, Sarasota USA, April 9–13, 2003Google Scholar
  29. Djordjevic J, Zatorre RJ, Jones-Gotman M (2004) Effects of perceived and imagined odors on taste detection. Chem Senses 29:199–208Google Scholar
  30. Dravnieks A (1985) Atlas of odor character profiles. ASTM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  31. Driver J, Spence C (2000) Multisensory perception: beyond modularity and convergence. Curr Biol 10:R731–R735Google Scholar
  32. Epstein R, Kanwisher N (1998) A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392:598–601Google Scholar
  33. Fort A, Delpuech C, Pernier J, Giard MH (2002) Dynamics of cortico-subcortical cross-modal operations involved in audio-visual object detection in humans. Cereb Cortex 12:1031–1039Google Scholar
  34. Francis S, Rolls ET, Bowtell R, McGlone F, O’Doherty J, Browning A, Clare S, Smith E (1999) The representation of pleasant touch in the brain and its relationship with taste and olfactory areas. Neuroreport 10:435–459Google Scholar
  35. Frank RA (2003) Response context affects judgments of flavor components in foods and beverages. Food Qual Pref 14:139–145Google Scholar
  36. Frank RA, Byram J (1988) Taste-smell interactions are tastant and odorant dependent. Chem Senses 13:445–455Google Scholar
  37. Frank RA, Ducheny K, Mize SJ (1989) Strawberry odor but not red color enhances the sweetness of sucrose solutions. Chem Senses 14:371–377Google Scholar
  38. Frank RA, Shaffer G, Smith DV (1991) Taste–odor similarities predict taste enhancement and suppression in taste–odor mixtures. Chem Senses 16:523Google Scholar
  39. Frank RA, van der Klaauw NJ, Schifferstein HNJ (1993) Both perceptual and conceptual factors influence taste–odor and taste–taste interactions. Percept Psychophys 54:343–354Google Scholar
  40. Frey S, Petrides M (1999) Re-examination of the human taste region: a positron emission tomography study. Eur J Neurosci 11:2985–2988Google Scholar
  41. Fulbright RK, Skudlarski P, Lacadie CM, Warrenburg S, Bowers AA, Gore JC, Wexler BE (1998) Functional MR imaging of regional brain responses to pleasant and unpleasant odors. Am J Neuroradiol 19:1721–1726Google Scholar
  42. Garner WR (1974) Attention: the processing of multiple sources of information. In: Carterette EC, Friedman MP (eds) Handbook of perception, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 23–59Google Scholar
  43. Giard MH, Peronnet F (1999) Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. J Cogn Neurosci 11:473–490Google Scholar
  44. Gibson JJ (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  45. Gottfried JA, Deichmann R, Winston JS, Dolan RJ (2002a) Functional heterogeneity in human olfactory cortex: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 22:10819–10828Google Scholar
  46. Gottfried JA, O’Doherty J, Dolan RJ (2002b) Appetitive and aversive olfactory learning in humans studied using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 22:10829–10837Google Scholar
  47. Green BG (2003) Studying taste as a cutaneous sense. Food Qual Pref 14:99–109Google Scholar
  48. Kinomura S, Kawashima R, Yamada K, Ono S, Itoh M, Yoshioka S, Yamaguchi T, Matsui H, Miyazawa H, Itoh H (1994) Functional anatomy of taste perception in the human brain studied with positron emission tomography. Brain Res 659:263–266Google Scholar
  49. van der Klaauw NJ, Frank RA (1996) Scaling component intensities of complex stimuli: the influence of response alternatives. Environ Int 22:21–31Google Scholar
  50. Kobayakawa T, Ogawa H, Kaneda H, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Endo H, Saito S (1999) Spatio-temporal analysis of cortical activity evoked by gustatory stimulation in humans. Chem Senses 24:201–209Google Scholar
  51. Kringelbach ML, de Araujo IE, Rolls ET (2004) Taste-related activity in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage 21:781–788Google Scholar
  52. Laing DJ, Link C, Jinks AL, Hutchinson I (2002) The limited capacity of humans to identify the components of taste mixtures and taste–odour mixtures. Perception 31:617–635Google Scholar
  53. Laurienti PJ, Burdette JH, Wallace MT, Yen YF, Field AS, Stein BE (2002) Deactivation of sensory-specific cortex by cross-modal stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci 14:420–429Google Scholar
  54. Leger GC, Hummel T, Conley D, Mak YE, Simmons KB, Small DM (2003) Retronasal presentation of a food odor preferentially activates cortical chemosensory areas compared to orthonasal presentation of the same odor and retronasal presentation of a nonfood odor. Chem Senses 28:554Google Scholar
  55. Lewald J, Guski R (2003) Cross-modal perceptual integration of spatially and temporally disparate auditory and visual stimuli. Cogn Brain Res 16:468–478Google Scholar
  56. Lewis JW, Beauchamp MS, DeYoe EA (2000) A comparison of visual and auditory motion processing in human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 10:873–888Google Scholar
  57. Macaluso E, Driver J (2001) Spatial attention and crossmodal interactions between vision and touch. Neuropsychology 39:1304–1316Google Scholar
  58. Macaluso E, Frith C, Driver J (2000) Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. Science 289:1206–1208Google Scholar
  59. Marks LE (1991) Metaphor and the unity of the senses. In: Lawless HT, BP Klein (eds) Sensory science theory and applications in foods. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 185–205Google Scholar
  60. Marks LE, Ashkenazi A (2004) Effect of endogenous attention on detection of weak gustatory and olfactory flavor. Percept Psychophys 66:596–608Google Scholar
  61. Martino G, Marks LE (2000) Synesthesia: strong and weak. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 10:61–65Google Scholar
  62. McBurney DH (1986) Taste smell and flavor terminology: taking the confusion out of fusion. In: Meiselman HL, Rivkin RS (eds) Clinical measurement of taste and smell. Macmillan, New York, pp 117–125Google Scholar
  63. McBurney DH, Bartoshuk LM (1973) Interactions between stimuli with different taste qualities. Physiol Behav 10:1101–1106Google Scholar
  64. McDonald JJ, Teder-Salejarvi WA, Di Russo F, Hillyard SA (2003) Neural substrates of perceptual enhancement by cross-modal spatial attention. J Cogn Neurosci 15:10–19Google Scholar
  65. Melara RD, Marks LE, Lesko KE (1992) Optional processes in similarity judgments. Percep Psychophys 51:123–133Google Scholar
  66. Meredith MA, Stein BE (1983) Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus. Science 221:389–391Google Scholar
  67. Meredith MA, Stein B (1986) Visual auditory and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. J Neurophysiol 56:640–662Google Scholar
  68. Mesulam MM (1998) From sensation to cognition. Brain 121:1013–1025Google Scholar
  69. Murphy C, Cain WS, Bartoshuk LM (1977) Mutual action of taste and olfaction. Sens Proc 1:204–211Google Scholar
  70. Nguyen DH, Valentin D, Ly MH, Chrea C, Sauvageot F (2002) When does smell enhance taste? Effect of culture and odorant/tastant relationship. Paper presented at European Chemoreception Research Organisation conference, Erlangen Germany, 23–27 July 2002Google Scholar
  71. O’Doherty J, Rolls ET, Francis S, Bowtell R, McGlone F, Kobal G, Renner B, Ahne G (2000) Sensory-specific satiety-related olfactory activation of the human orbitofrontal cortex. Neuroreport 11:399–403Google Scholar
  72. O’Doherty J, Rolls ET, Francis S, Bowtell R, McGlone F (2001) Representation of pleasant and aversive taste in the human brain. J Neurophysiol 85:1315–1321Google Scholar
  73. O’Doherty JP, Deichmann R, Critchley HD, Dolan RJ (2002) Neural responses during anticipation of a primary taste reward. Neuron 33:815–826Google Scholar
  74. Pardo JV, Wood TD, Costello PA, Pardo PJ, Lee JT (1997) PET study of the localization and laterality of lingual somatosensory processing in humans. Neurosci Lett 234:23–26Google Scholar
  75. Poellinger A, Thomas R, Lio P, Lee A, Makris N, Rosen BR, Kwong KK (2001) Activation and habituation in olfaction—an fMRI study. Neuroimage 13:547–560Google Scholar
  76. Prescott J (1999) Flavour as a psychological construct: implications for perceiving and measuring the sensory qualities of foods. Food Qual Pref 10:349–356Google Scholar
  77. Prescott J (2004) Psychological processes in flavour perception. In: Taylor AJ, Roberts D (eds) Flavor perception. Blackwell Publishing, London, pp 256–277Google Scholar
  78. Prescott J, Johnstone V, Francis J (2004) Odor/taste interactions: effects of different attentional strategies during exposure. Chem Senses 29:331–340Google Scholar
  79. Qureshy A, Kawashima R, Imran MB, Sugiura M, Goto R, Okada K, Inoue K, Itoh M, Schormann T, Zilles K, Fukuda H (2000) Functional mapping of human brain in olfactory processing: a PET study. J Neurophysiol 84:1656–1666Google Scholar
  80. Rescorla RA (1980) Simultaneous and successive associations in sensory preconditioning. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 6:207–216Google Scholar
  81. Rolls ET (1997) Taste and olfactory processing in the brain and its relation to the control of eating. Crit Rev Neurobiol 11:263–287Google Scholar
  82. Rolls ET, Baylis LL (1994) Gustatory olfactory and visual convergence within the primate orbitofrontal cortex. J Neurosci 14:5437–5452Google Scholar
  83. Rolls ET, Critchley HD, Mason R, Wakeman EA (1996a) Orbitofrontal cortex neurons: role in olfactory and visual association learning. J Neurophysiol 75:1970–1981Google Scholar
  84. Rolls ET, Critchley HD, Treves A (1996b) Representation of olfactory information in the primate orbitofrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol 75:1982–1996Google Scholar
  85. Rolls ET, Critchley HD, Browning AS, Hernadi I, Lenard L (1999) Responses to the sensory properties of fat of neurons in the primate orbitofrontal cortex. J Neurosci 19:1532–1540Google Scholar
  86. Rolls ET, Kringelbach ML, de Araujo E (2003) Different representations of pleasant and unpleasant odours in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci 18:695–703Google Scholar
  87. Royet JP, Koenig O, Gregoire MC, Cinotti L, Lavenne F, Le Bars D, Costes N, Vigouroux M, Farget V, Sicard G, Holley A, Mauguiere F, Comar D, Froment JC (1999) Functional anatomy of perceptual and semantic processing for odors. J Cogn Neurosci 11:94–109Google Scholar
  88. Royet JP, Zald D, Versace R, Costes N, Lavenne F, Koenig O, Gervais R (2000) Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant olfactory, visual, and auditory stimuli: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci 20:7752–7759Google Scholar
  89. Royet JP, Plailly J, Delon-Martin C, Kareken DA, Segebarth C (2003) fMRI of emotional responses to odors: influence of hedonic valence and judgment, handedness, and gender. Neuroimage 20:713–728Google Scholar
  90. Rozin P (1982) “Taste-smell confusions” and the duality of the olfactory sense. Percept Psychophys 31:397–401Google Scholar
  91. Sakai N, Imada S (2003) Bilateral lesions of the insular cortex or of the prefrontal cortex block the association between taste and odor in the rat. Neurobiol Learn Mem 80:24–31Google Scholar
  92. Sakai N, Kobayakawa T, Gotow N, Saito S, Imada S (2001) Enhancement of sweetness ratings of aspartame by a vanilla odor presented either by orthonasal or retronasal routes. Percept Mot Skills 92:1002–1008Google Scholar
  93. Savic I, Gulyas B (2000) PET shows that odors are processed both ipsilaterally and contralaterally to the stimulated nostril. Neuroreport 11:2861–2866Google Scholar
  94. Savic I, Gulyas B, Larsson M, Roland P (2000) Olfactory functions are mediated by parallel and hierarchical processing. Neuron 26:735–745Google Scholar
  95. Schifferstein HNJ, Verlegh PWJ (1996) The role of congruency and pleasantness in odor-induced taste enhancement. Acta Psychol 94:87–105Google Scholar
  96. Scott TR, Plata-Salaman CR (1999) Taste in the monkey cortex. Physiol Behav 67:489–511Google Scholar
  97. Scott TR, Yaxley S, Sienkiewicz ZJ, Rolls ET (1986) Gustatory responses in the frontal opercular cortex of the alert cynomolgus monkey. J Neurophysiol 56:876–890Google Scholar
  98. Slotnick B, Westbrook MF, Darling FMC (1997) What the rat’s nose tells the rat’s mouth: long delay aversion conditioning with aqueous odors and potentiation of taste by odors. Anim Learn Behav 25:357–369Google Scholar
  99. Small DM, Jones-Gotman M, Zatorre RJ, Petrides M, Evans AC (1997a) Flavor processing: more than the sum of its parts. Neuroreport 8:3913–3917Google Scholar
  100. Small DM, Jones-Gotman M, Zatorre RJ, Petrides M, Evans AC (1997b) A role for the right anterior temporal lobe in taste quality recognition. J Neurosci 17:5136–5142Google Scholar
  101. Small DM, Zald DH, Jones-Gotman M, Zatorre RJ, Pardo JV, Frey S, Petrides M (1999) Human cortical gustatory areas: a review of functional neuroimaging data. Neuroreport 10:7–14Google Scholar
  102. Small DM, Zatorre RJ, Dagher A, Evans AC, Jones-Gotman M (2001) Changes in brain activity related to eating chocolate: from pleasure to aversion. Brain 124:1720–1733Google Scholar
  103. Small DM, Gregory MD, Mak YE, Gitelman DR, Mesulam MM, Parrish TB (2003) Dissociation of neural representation of intensity and affective valuation in human gustation. Neuron 39:701–711Google Scholar
  104. Small DM, Voss J, Mak YE, Simmons KB, Parrish TB, Gitelman DR (2004) Experience-dependent neural integration of taste and smell in the human brain. J Neurophysiol 92:1892–1903Google Scholar
  105. Sobel N, Prabhakaran V, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Goode RL, Sullivan EV, Gabrieli JD (1998) Sniffing and smelling: separate subsystems in the human olfactory cortex. Nature 392:282–286Google Scholar
  106. Sobel N, Prabhakaran V, Zhao Z, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Sullivan EV, Gabrieli JD (2000) Time course of odorant-induced activation in the human primary olfactory cortex. J Neurophysiol 83:537–551Google Scholar
  107. Spence CB, Kettenmann B, Kobal G, McGlone FP (2000) Selective attention to the chemosensory modality. Percept Psychophys 62:1265–1271Google Scholar
  108. Spence CB, McGlone FP, Kettenmann B, Kobal G (2001) Attention to olfaction. A psychophysical investigation. Exp Brain Res 138:432–437Google Scholar
  109. Stein BE (1998) Neural mechanisms for synthesizing sensory information and producing adaptive behaviours. Exp Brain Res 123:124–135Google Scholar
  110. Stein BE, Meredith MA (1993) The merging of the senses. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  111. Stein BE, Huneycutt WS, Meredith MA (1988) Neurons and behavior: the same rules of multisensory integration apply. Brain Res 448:355–358Google Scholar
  112. Stevenson RJ, Boakes RA (2004) Sweet and sour smells: the acquisition of taste-like qualities by odors. In: Spence CB, Calvert G, Stein B (eds) Handbook of multisensory processing. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  113. Stevenson RJ, Prescott J (1997) Judgments of chemosensory mixtures in memory. Acta Psychol 95:195–214Google Scholar
  114. Stevenson RJ, Prescott J, Boakes RA (1995) The acquisition of taste properties by odors. Learn Motiv 26:1–23Google Scholar
  115. Stevenson RJ, Boakes RA, Prescott J (1998) Changes in odor sweetness resulting from implicit learning of a simultaneous odor-sweetness association: an example of learned synesthesia. Learn Motiv 29:113–132Google Scholar
  116. Stevenson RJ, Prescott J, Boakes RA (1999) Confusing tastes and smells: how odors can influence the perception of sweet and sour tastes. Chem Senses 24:627–635Google Scholar
  117. Stevenson RJ, Boakes RA, Wilson JP (2000) Resistance to extinction of conditioned odor perceptions: evaluative conditioning is not unique. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn 26:423–440Google Scholar
  118. Todrank J, Bartoshuk LM (1991) A taste illusion: taste sensation localised by touch. Physiol Behav 50:1027–1031Google Scholar
  119. Triesman A (1999) Solutions to the binding problem: progress through controversy and convergence. Neuron 24:105–110Google Scholar
  120. Verhagen JV, Rolls ET, Kadohisa M (2003) Neurons in the primate orbitofrontal cortex respond to fat texture independently of viscosity. J Neurophysiol 90:1514–1525Google Scholar
  121. Welge-Lüßen A, Drago J, Wolfensberger M, Hummel T (2004) Interaktion von Schmecken und Riechen. HNO-Informationen 29:123Google Scholar
  122. White T, Prescott J (2001) Odors influence speed of taste naming. Chem Senses 26:1119Google Scholar
  123. White T, Prescott J (2002) Learned associations with smells influence taste naming speed. European chemoreception research organisation conference, Erlangen Germany, 23–27 July 2002Google Scholar
  124. Yaxley S, Rolls ET, Sienkiewicz ZJ (1988) The responsiveness of neurons in the insular gustatory cortex of the macaque monkey is independent of hunger. Physiol Behav 42:223–229Google Scholar
  125. Yaxley S, Rolls ET, Sienkiewicz ZJ (1990) Gustatory responses of single neurons in the insula of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 63:689–700Google Scholar
  126. Zald DH, Pardo JV (1997) Emotion, olfaction and the human amygdala: amygdala activation during aversive olfactory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:4119–4124Google Scholar
  127. Zald DH, Lee JT, Fluegel KW, Pardo JV (1998) Aversive gustatory stimulation activates limbic circuits in humans. Brain 121:1143–1154Google Scholar
  128. Zald DH, Hagen MC, Pardo JV (2002) Neural correlates of tasting concentrated quinine and sugar solutions. J Neurophysiol 87:1068–1075Google Scholar
  129. Zatorre RJ, Jones-Gotman M, Evans AC, Meyer E (1992) Functional localization and lateralization of human olfactory cortex. Nature 360:339–340Google Scholar
  130. Zatorre RJ, Jones-Gotman M, Rouby C (2000) Neural mechanisms involved in odor pleasantness and intensity judgments. Neuroreport 11:2711–2716Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The John B Pierce Laboratory and Section of OtolaryngologyYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.School of PsychologyJames Cook UniversityCairnsAustralia

Personalised recommendations