Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 166, Issue 2, pp 170–183 | Cite as

Functional imaging of changes in cerebellar activity related to learning during a novel eye–hand tracking task

Research Article

Abstract

Coordination between the eyes and the hand is likely to be based on a process of motor learning, so that the interactions between the two systems can be accurately controlled. By using an unusual tracking task we measured the change in brain activation levels, as recorded with 3T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), between naïve human subjects and the same subjects after a period of extended training. Initially the performance of the two groups was similar. One subject group was then trained in a synchronous, coordinated, eye–hand task; the other group trained with a 304 ms temporal offset between hand and eye tracking movements. After training, different patterns of performance were observed for the groups, and different functional activation profiles. Significant change in the relationship between functional activation levels and eye–hand task conditions was predominantly restricted to visuo-motor areas of the lateral and vermal cerebellum. In an additional test with one of the subject groups, we show that there was increased cerebellar activation after learning, irrespective of change in performance error. These results suggest that two factors contribute to the measured blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal. One declined with training and may be directly related to performance error. The other increased after training, in the test conditions nearest to the training condition, and may therefore be related to acquisition of experience in the task. The loci of activity changes suggest that improved performance is because of selective modified processing of ocular and manual control signals within the cerebellum. These results support the suggestion that coordination between eye and hand movement is based on an internal model acquired by the cerebellum that provides predictive signals linking the control of the two effectors.

Keywords

Human Coordination Functional imaging Cerebellum Motor learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by a Wellcome Trust Fellowship to RCM and by MRC support of the Oxford FMRIB Centre. We thank all FMRIB staff for their technical support, analysis software and advice, and thank Ji-Hang Lee for his data on eye tracking performance mentioned in the results.

References

  1. Allen G, Buxton RB, Wong EC, Courchesne E (1997) Attentional activation of the cerebellum independent of motor involvement. Science 275:1940–1943CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cabeza R, Nyberg L (2000) Imaging cognition II: an empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. J Cogn Neurosci 12:1–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carter N, Zee DS (1997) The anatomical localization of saccades using functional imaging studies and transcranial magnetic stimulation. Curr Opin Neurol 10:10–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Desmurget M, Pelisson D, Urquizar C, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST (1998) Functional anatomy of saccadic adaptation in humans. Nat Neurosci 1:524–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Duvernoy HM (1999) The human brain surface, blood supply, and three-dimensional sectional anatomy. Springer-Verlag Wein, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC (1995) Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med 33:636–647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Friston KJ, Worsley KJ, Frackowiak RSJ, Mazziota JC, Evans AC (1994) Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Hum Brain Mapp 1:214–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grafton ST, Mazziotta JC, Presty S, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RSJ, Phelps ME (1992) Functional anatomy of human procedural learning determined with regional cerebral blood flow and PET. J Neurosci 12:2542–2548PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Imamizu H, Miyauchi S, Tamada T, Sasaki Y, Takino R, Putz B, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (2000) Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature 403:192–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Imamizu H, Kuroda T, Miyauchi S, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (2003) Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5461–5466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ito M (2002) Historical review of the significance of the cerebellum and the role of Purkinje cells in motor learning. Ann NY Acad Sci 978:273–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jenkins IH, Brooks DJ, Nixon PD, Frackowiak RSJ, Passingham RE (1994) Motor sequence learning: a study with positron emission tomography. J Neurosci 14:3775–3790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jenkinson M, Smith S (2001) A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal 5:143–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S (2002) Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17:825–841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jueptner M, Frith CD, Brooks DJ, Frackowiak RSJ, Passingham RE (1997a) Anatomy of motor learning 2 Subcortical structures and learning by trial and error. J Neurophysiol 77:1325–1337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jueptner M, Stephan KM, Frith CD, Brooks DJ, Frackowiak RSJ, Passingham RE (1997b) Anatomy of motor learning 1 Frontal cortex and attention to action. J Neurophysiol 77:1313–1324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis RF, Zee DS (1993) Ocular motor disorders associated with cerebellar lesions: pathophysiology and topical localization. Rev Neurol (Paris) 149:665–677Google Scholar
  18. Miall RC, Reckess GZ (2002) The cerebellum and the timing of coordinated eye and hand tracking. Brain Cogn 48:212–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Miall RC, Imamizu H, Miyauchi S (2000) Activation of the cerebellum in co-ordinated eye and hand tracking movements: an fMRI study. Exp Brain Res 135:22–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Miall RC, Reckess GZ, Imamizu H (2001) The cerebellum coordinates eye and hand tracking movements. Natl Neurosci 4:638–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nezafat R, Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH (2001) Long-term adaptation to dynamics of reaching movements: a PET study. Exp Brain Res 140:66–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ohyama T, Nores WL, Murphy M, Mauk MD (2003) What the cerebellum computes. Trends Neurosci 26:222–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Petit L, Orssaud C, Tzourio N, Crivello F, Berthoz A, Mazoyer B (1996) Functional anatomy of a prelearned sequence of horizontal saccades in humans. J Neurosci 16:3714–3726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramnani N, Passingham RE (2001) Changes in the human brain during rhythm learning. J Cogn Neurosci 13:952–966CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramnani N, Toni I, Josephs O, Ashburner J, Passingham RE (2000) Learning and expectation-related changes in the human brain during motor learning. J Neurophysiol 84:3026–3035PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmahmann JD, Doyon J, McDonald D, Holmes C, Lavoie K, Hurwitz AS, Kabani N, Toga A, Evans A, Petrides M (1999) Three-dimensional MRI atlas of the human cerebellum in proportional stereotaxic space. Neuroimage 10:233–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Seidler RD, Purushotham A, Kim SG, Ugurbil K, Willingham D, Ashe J (2002) Cerebellum activation associated with performance change but not motor learning. Science 296:2043–2046CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH (1997) Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science 277:821–825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith SM (2001) Overview of fMRI analysis. In: Jezzard P, Matthews PM, Smith SM (eds) Functional MRI: an introduction to methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 215–227Google Scholar
  30. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Georg Thieme Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  31. Tamada T, Miyauchi S, Imamizu H, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (1999) Cerebro-cerebellar functional connectivity revealed by the laterality index in tool-use learning. Neuroreport 10:325–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Thach WT, Goodkin HP, Keating JG (1992) The cerebellum and the adaptive coordination of movement. Ann Rev Neurosci 15:403–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Turner RS, Grafton ST, Votaw JR, DeLong MR, Hoffman JM (1998) Motor subcircuits mediating the control of movement velocity: a PET study. J Neurophysiol 80:2162–2176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Woolrich MW, Ripley BD, Brady M, Smith SM (2001) Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. Neuroimage 14:1370–1386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Worsley KJ, Evans AC, Marrett S, Neelin P (1992) A three-dimensional statistical analysis for rCBF activation studies in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 12:900–918PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behavioural Brain Sciences, School of PsychologyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  2. 2.University Laboratory of PhysiologyOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations