Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory
- 8.4k Downloads
Previous studies have claimed that weak transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces persisting excitability changes in the human motor cortex that can be more pronounced than cortical modulation induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation, but there are no studies that have evaluated the effects of tDCS on working memory. Our aim was to determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, which enhances brain cortical excitability and activity, would modify performance in a sequential-letter working memory task when administered to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Fifteen subjects underwent a three-back working memory task based on letters. This task was performed during sham and anodal stimulation applied over the left DLPFC. Moreover seven of these subjects performed the same task, but with inverse polarity (cathodal stimulation of the left DLPFC) and anodal stimulation of the primary motor cortex (M1). Our results indicate that only anodal stimulation of the left prefrontal cortex, but not cathodal stimulation of left DLPFC or anodal stimulation of M1, increases the accuracy of the task performance when compared to sham stimulation of the same area. This accuracy enhancement during active stimulation cannot be accounted for by slowed responses, as response times were not changed by stimulation. Our results indicate that left prefrontal anodal stimulation leads to an enhancement of working memory performance. Furthermore, this effect depends on the stimulation polarity and is specific to the site of stimulation. This result may be helpful to develop future interventions aiming at clinical benefits.
KeywordsElectrical stimulation Prefrontal cortex Transcranial magnetic stimulation Working memory
This work was supported by a grant within the Harvard Medical School Scholars in Clinical Science Program (NIH K30 HL04095-03) to F.F.; a grant within the Postdoc-Programme of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD, D/02/46858) to F.B.; and by K24 RR018875 to A.P.-L. The authors would like to thank Barbara Bonetti for the invaluable administrative support and to Adriana L. Vieira, Elizabeth M. Saade, Carolina R.B. Souza and Patricia Otachi for the help on data acquisition.
- Boggio PS, Fregni F, Bermpohl F, Mansur CG, Rosa M, Rumi DO, Barbosa E, Odebrecht-Rosa M, Marcolin MA, Silva MTA (2005) The effect of repetitive TMS and fluoxetine on cognitive function in patients with Parkinson’s disease and concurrent depression. Mov Disord (in press). DOI 10.1002/mds.20508Google Scholar
- Siebner HR, Lang N, Rizzo V, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Lemon RN, Rothwell JC (2004) Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci 24:3379–3385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar