Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 164, Issue 4, pp 505–516 | Cite as

Influence of biomechanical factors on substructure of pointing movements

  • Natalia Dounskaia
  • Deric Wisleder
  • Travis Johnson
Research Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Irregularities in the velocity profile near the end of pointing movements have been interpreted as corrective submovements whose purpose is to provide accuracy of pointing to the target. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether two additional factors related to biomechanical properties of the arm also cause submovements. First, motion termination and stabilization of the limb in the final position required by a discrete pointing task may contribute to submovements. Second, inaccurate regulation of interactive torque at the joints may also cause submovements. To investigate the contributions of these two biomechanical factors and the traditionally considered factor of pointing accuracy, the incidence of submovements was analyzed during three types of experimental manipulations. In addition to target size manipulations (small and large targets), conditions for motion termination were manipulated by examining discrete movements (which terminated at the target) and reciprocal movements (which reversed direction without dwelling on the target). Interaction torques were varied by using targets that require different shoulder–elbow coordination patterns. Submovements were detected in 41% of all analyzed movements. Data supported influences from the accuracy and motion termination factors but not from the interactive torque regulation factor on submovement incidence. Gross submovements were associated with motion termination; fine submovements primarily with accuracy demands. These findings and the analysis of temporal movement characteristics suggest that motion termination is an extra movement component that makes control of discrete movements different to control of reciprocal movements. Implications of the findings to a noise-related interpretation of Fitts’ law are discussed. The study emphasizes the influence of arm biomechanics on endpoint kinematics.

Keywords

Arm kinematics Discrete Rhythmic Velocity Accuracy Noise Fitts’ law 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by NSF grant BCS 0213653 awarded to Dr. Natalia Dounskaia.

References

  1. Adam JJ, van der Bruggen DPW, Bekkering H (1993) The control of discrete and reciprocal target-aiming responces: evidence for the exploitation of mechanics. Hum Mov Sci 12:353–364Google Scholar
  2. Adam JJ, Nieuwenstein JH, Huys R, Paas FG, Kingma H, Willems P, Werry M (2000) Control of rapid aimed hand movements: the one-target advantage. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:295–312Google Scholar
  3. Adamovich SV, Levin MF, Feldman AG (1994) Merging different motor patterns: coordination between rhythmical and discrete single-joint movements. Exp Brain Res 99:325–337Google Scholar
  4. Amrhein PC (1996) Age-related slowing in movement parameterization studies: not what you might think. In: Fernandez AM, Teasdale N (eds) Changes in sensory motor behavior in aging, vol 114. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. Berardelli A, Hallett M, Rothwell JC, Agostino R, Manfredi M, Thompson PD, Marsden CD (1996) Single-joint rapid arm movements in normal subjects and in patients with motor disorders. Brain 119:661–674Google Scholar
  6. Birren JE (1974) Translations in gerontology—from lab to life. Psychophysiology and speed of response. Am Psychol 29:808–815Google Scholar
  7. Buchanan JJ, Park JH, Ryu YU, Shea CH (2003) Discrete and cyclical units of action in a mixed target pair aiming task. Exp Brain Res 150:473–489Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan JJ, Park JH, Shea CH (2004) Systematic scaling of target width: dynamics, planning, and feedback. Neurosci Lett 367:317–322Google Scholar
  9. Chua R, Elliott D (1993) Visial regulation of manual aiming. Hum Mov Sci 12:365–401Google Scholar
  10. Crossman ERFW, Goodeve PJ (1983) Feedback control of hand-movement and Fitts’ law. Q J Exp Psychol 35A:251–278Google Scholar
  11. Darling WG, Cooke JD, Brown SH (1989) Control of simple arm movements in elderly humans. Neurobiol Aging 10:149–157Google Scholar
  12. Dounskaia NV, Ketcham CJ, Stelmach GE (2002a) Commonalities and differences in control of a large set of drawing movements. Exp Brain Res 146:11–25Google Scholar
  13. Dounskaia N, Ketcham CJ, Stelmach GE (2002b) Influence of biomechanical constraints on horizontal arm movements. Motor Control 6:366–87Google Scholar
  14. Elliott D, Helsen WF, Chua R (2001) A century later: two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychol Bull 127:342–357Google Scholar
  15. Enoka RM, Christou EA, Hunter SK, Kornatz KW, Semmler JG, Taylor AM, Tracy BL (2003) Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13:1–12Google Scholar
  16. Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391Google Scholar
  17. Galganski ME, Fuglevand AJ, Enoka RM (1993) Reduced control of motor output in a human hand muscle of elderly subjects during submaximal contractions. J Neurophysiol 69:2108–2115Google Scholar
  18. Ghez C, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Sainburg RL (1994) Contributions of vision and proprioception to accuracy in limb movements. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The cognitive neurosciences. MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp 549–564Google Scholar
  19. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Cooper SE, Ghez C (1994) Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Exp Brain Res 99:112–130Google Scholar
  20. Gottlieb GL (1998) Muscle activation patterns during two types of voluntary single-joint movements. J Neurophysiol 80:1860–1867Google Scholar
  21. Gribble PL, Ostry DJ (1999) Compensation for interaction torques during single- and multijoint limb movement. J Neurophysiol 82:2310–2326Google Scholar
  22. Guiard Y (1993) On Fitts’s and Hooke’s laws: simple harmonic movement in upper limb cyclical aiming. Acta Psychol 82:139–159Google Scholar
  23. Guiard Y (1997) Fitts’ law in the discrete vs. cyclical paradigm. Hum Mov Sci 16:97–131Google Scholar
  24. Hallet M, Shanani BT, Young RR (1975) EMG analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38:1154–1162Google Scholar
  25. Hallett M, Khoshbin S (1980) A physiological mechanism of bradykinesia. Brain 103:301–304Google Scholar
  26. Hannaford B, Stark L (1985) Roles of the elements of the triphasic control signal. Exp Neurol 90:619–635Google Scholar
  27. Hollerbach JM, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol Cybern 44:67–77Google Scholar
  28. Kelso JAS (1992) Theoretical concepts and strategies for understanding perceptual-motor skill: from information capacity in closed systems to self-organization in open, nonequilibrium systems. J Exp Psychol Gen 121:260–262Google Scholar
  29. Ketcham CJ, Seidler RD, Van Gemmert AWA, Stelmach GE (2002) Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target-size, and movement amplitude. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 57:54–64Google Scholar
  30. Khan MA, Franks IM (2003) Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the production of component submovements. J Mot Behav 35:285–295Google Scholar
  31. Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Smith JEK (1988) Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95:340–370Google Scholar
  32. Novak KE, Miller LE, Houk JC (2000) Kinematic properties of rapid hand movements in a knob turning task. Exp Brain Res 132:419–433Google Scholar
  33. Pratt J, Chasteen AL, Abrams RA (1994) Rapid aimed limb movements: age differences and practice effects in component submovements. Psychol Aging 9:325–334Google Scholar
  34. Rand MK, Stelmach GE, Bloedel JR (2000) Movement accuracy constraints in Parkinson’s disease patients. Neuropsychologia 38:203–212Google Scholar
  35. Sainburg RL, Poizner H, Ghez C (1993) Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. J Neurophysiol 70:2136–2147Google Scholar
  36. Sainburg RL, Ghilardi MF, Poizner H, Ghez C (1995) Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. J Neurophysiol 73:820–835Google Scholar
  37. Sainburg RL, Ghez C, Kalakanis D (1999) Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 81:1045–1056Google Scholar
  38. Salthouse TA (1985) A theory of cognitive aging. In: Stelmach GE, Vroon PA (eds) Advances in psychology, vol 28. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt RA, Sherwood DE, Waler CB (1988) Rapid movements with reversals in direction I. The control of movement time. Exp Brain Res 69:344–354Google Scholar
  40. Schöner G (1990) A dynamic theory of coordination of discrete movement. Biol Cybern 63:257–270Google Scholar
  41. Seidler RD, Alberts JL, Stelmach GE (2001) Multijoint movement control in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 140:335–344Google Scholar
  42. Seidler-Dobrin RD, Stelmach GE (1998) Persistence in visual feedback control by the elderly. Exp Brain Res 119:467–474Google Scholar
  43. Seidler-Dobrin RD, He J, Stelmach GE (1998) Coactivation to reduce variability in elderly. Motor Control 2:314–330Google Scholar
  44. Smits-Engelsman BCM, Van Galen GP, Duysens J (2002) The breakdown of Fitts’ law in rapid, reciprocal aiming movements. Exp Brain Res 145:222–230Google Scholar
  45. Smyrnis N, Evdokimidis I, Constantinidis TS (2000) Speed-accuracy trade-off in the performance of pointing movements in different directions in two-dimensional space. Exp Brain Res 134:21–31Google Scholar
  46. Sternad D, Dean WJ, Schaal S (2000) Interaction of rhythmic and discrete pattern generators in single-joint movements. Hum Mov Sci 19:627–664Google Scholar
  47. Teeken JC, Adam JJ, Paas FG, van Boxtel MP, Houx PJ, Jolles J (1996) Effects of age and gender on discrete and reciprocal aiming movements. Psychol Aging 11:195–198Google Scholar
  48. Van Galen GP, De Jong WP (1995) Fitts’ law as the outcome of a dynamic noise filtering mode of motor control. Hum Mov Sci 14:539–572Google Scholar
  49. Van Galen GP, Schomaker LRB (1992) Fitts’ law as a low-pass filter effect of muscle stiffness. Hum Mov Sci 11:11–22Google Scholar
  50. Walker N, Philbin DA, Fisk AD (1997) Age-related differences in movement control: adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 52B:40–52Google Scholar
  51. Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Rev Suppl 3:1–119Google Scholar
  52. Zelaznik HN, Hawkins B, Kisselburgh L (1983) Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. J Mot Behav 17:217–236Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia Dounskaia
    • 1
  • Deric Wisleder
    • 1
  • Travis Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of KinesiologyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations