Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 164, Issue 2, pp 225–241 | Cite as

Basic elements of arm postural control analyzed by unloading

  • Philippe S. Archambault
  • Pavel Mihaltchev
  • Mindy F. Levin
  • Anatol G. Feldman
Research Article

Abstract

To address the question of how arm posture is controlled, we analyzed shoulder–elbow unloading responses in the horizontal plane for different directions of the initial load. The initial load, produced by a double-joint manipulandum, was suddenly diminished to 1of 12 randomly presented levels (60 to −10% of the initial load; in 6 out of 12 cases the final load direction varied by ±20°). Subjects were instructed “not to intervene” in response to unloading. Neither the unloading onset nor the final load level was predictable and we assumed that the responses to rapid unloading were involuntary. Unloading elicited a smooth hand movement characterized by a bell-shaped velocity profile. The changes in hand position, joint angles, and joint torques generally increased with greater amounts of unloading. For each direction of the initial load, tonic electromyographic activity of the shoulder and elbow muscles also changed, depending on the amount of unloading. The shoulder and elbow joint torques before and after unloading were a function of the difference between the actual configuration of the arm and its referent configuration (R) described by the angles at which each joint torque was zero. The R configuration changed depending on the direction of the initial load. Our electromyographic data imply that these changes result from a central modification of muscle activation thresholds. The nervous system may thus control the R configuration in a task-specific way by leaving it unchanged to generate involuntary responses to unloading or modifying it to accommodate a new load direction at the same initial position. It is concluded that the R configuration is a major variable in both intentional and involuntary control of posture.

Keywords

Unloading Shoulder Elbow Postural control Equilibrium-point hypothesis 

References

  1. Adamovich SV, Archambault PS, Ghafouri M, Levin MF, Poizner H, Feldman AG (2001) Hand trajectory invariance in reaching movements involving the trunk. Exp Brain Res 138:288–303Google Scholar
  2. Asatryan DG, Feldman AG (1965) Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of rhythmical movement or maintenance of a steady posture: 1. Mechanographic analysis of the work of the limb on execution of a postural task. Biophysics 10:925–935Google Scholar
  3. Bhushan N, Shadmehr R (1999) Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields. Biol Cybern 81:39–60Google Scholar
  4. Cesari P, Shiratori T, Olivato P, Duarte M (2001) Analysis of kinematically redundant reaching movements using the equilibrium-point hypothesis. Biol Cybern 84:217–226Google Scholar
  5. Crago PE, Houk JC, Hasan Z (1976) Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol 39:925–935Google Scholar
  6. Domen K, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (1999) Reconstruction of equilibrium trajectories during whole-body movements. Biol Cybern 80:195–204Google Scholar
  7. Dufosse M, Hugon M, Massion J (1985) Postural forearm changes induced by predictable in time or voluntary triggered unloading in man. Exp Brain Res 60:330–334Google Scholar
  8. Fasano G, Franceschini A (1987) Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol 225. pp 155–170Google Scholar
  9. Feldman AG (1966) Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture II: Controllable parameters of the muscle. Biophysics 11:565–578Google Scholar
  10. Feldman AG (1979) Central and reflex mechanisms in the control of movement. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldman AG, Levin MF (1995) The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control. Behav Brain Sci 18:723–806Google Scholar
  12. Feldman AG, Orlovsky GN (1972) The influence of different descending systems on the tonic stretch reflex in the cat. Exp Neurol 37:481–494Google Scholar
  13. Feldman AG, Levin MF, Mitnitski AM, Archambault P (1998) 1998 ISEK Congress Keynote Lecture: multi-muscle control in human movements. International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 8:383–390Google Scholar
  14. Flanagan JR, Ostry DJ, Feldman AG (1993) Control of trajectory modifications in target-directed reaching. J Mot Behav 25:140–152Google Scholar
  15. Flash T, Mussa-Ivaldi F (1990) Human arm stiffness characteristics during the maintenance of posture. Exp Brain Res 82:315–326Google Scholar
  16. Gomi H, Kawato M (1997) Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movement. Biol Cybern 76:163–171Google Scholar
  17. Gribble PL, Ostry DJ (2000) Compensation for loads during arm movements using equilibrium-point control. Exp Brain Res 135:474–482Google Scholar
  18. Gribble PL, Ostry DJ, Sanguineti V, Laboissiere R (1998) Are complex control signals required for human arm movement? J Neurophysiol 79:1409–1424Google Scholar
  19. Gunther M, Ruder H (2003) Synthesis of two-dimensional human walking: a test of the lambda-model. Biol Cybern 89:89–106Google Scholar
  20. Hill AV (1951) The influence of temperature on tension developed in an isometric twitch. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 139:349–354Google Scholar
  21. Houk JC (1976) An assessment of stretch reflex function. Prog Brain Res 44:303–314Google Scholar
  22. Kawato M (1999) Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:718–727Google Scholar
  23. Lacquaniti F, Soechting JF (1986) Responses of mono- and bi-articular muscles to load perturbations of the human arm. Exp Brain Res 65:135–144Google Scholar
  24. Latash ML (1994) Reconstruction of equilibrium trajectories and joint stiffness patterns during single-joint voluntary movements under different instructions. Biol Cybern 71:441–450Google Scholar
  25. Latash ML, Aruin AS, Zatsiorsky VM (1999) The basis of a simple synergy: reconstruction of joint equilibrium trajectories during unrestrained arm movements. Hum Mov Sci 18:3–30Google Scholar
  26. Lestienne FG, Thullier F, Archambault P, Levin MF, Feldman AG (2000) Multi-muscle control of head movements in monkeys: the referent configuration hypothesis. Neurosci Lett 283:65–68Google Scholar
  27. Levin MF, Dimov M (1997) Spatial zones for muscle coactivation and the control of postural stability. Brain Res 757:43–59Google Scholar
  28. Lieber RL, Friden J (1999) Mechanisms of muscle injury after eccentric contraction. J Sci Med Sport 2:253–265Google Scholar
  29. Mah CD (2001) Spatial and temporal modulation of joint stiffness during multijoint movement. Exp Brain Res 136:492–506Google Scholar
  30. Massion J (1992) Movement, posture and equilibrium: interaction and coordination. Prog Neurobiol 38:35–56Google Scholar
  31. Matthews PBC (1959) A study of certain factors influencing the stretch reflex of the decerebrate cat. J Physiol 147:547–564Google Scholar
  32. Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Hogan N, Bizzi E (1985) Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans. J Neurosci 5:2732–2743Google Scholar
  33. Nichols TR (1989) The organization of heterogenic reflexes among muscles crossing the ankle joint in the decerebrate cat. J Physiol 410:463–477Google Scholar
  34. Nichols TR, Steeves JD (1986) Resetting of resultant stiffness in ankle flexor and extensor muscles in the decerebrate cat. Exp Brain Res 62:401–410Google Scholar
  35. Ostry DJ, Feldman AG (2003) A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control. Exp Brain Res 153:275–288Google Scholar
  36. Ostry DJ, Gribble PL, Levin MF, Feldman AG (1997) Phasic and tonic stretch reflexes in muscles with few muscle spindles: human jaw-opener muscles. Exp Brain Res 116:299–308Google Scholar
  37. Osu R, Franklin DW, Kato H, Gomi H, Domen K, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (2002) Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. J Neurophysiol 88:991–1004Google Scholar
  38. Peacock JA (1983) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol 202. pp 615–627Google Scholar
  39. Popescu FC, Rymer WZ (2000) End points of planar reaching movements are disrupted by small force pulses: an evaluation of the hypothesis of equifinality. J Neurophysiol 84:2670–2679Google Scholar
  40. Scholz JP, Schoner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126:289–306Google Scholar
  41. Scholz JP, Schoner G, Latash ML (2000) Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting. Exp Brain Res 135:382–404Google Scholar
  42. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208–3224Google Scholar
  43. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Bizzi E (1993) Postural force fields of the human arm and their role in generating multijoint movements. J Neurosci 13:45–62Google Scholar
  44. St-Onge N, Adamovich SV, Feldman AG (1997) Control processes underlying elbow flexion movements may be independent of kinematic and electromyographic patterns: experimental study and modelling. Neuroscience 79:295–316Google Scholar
  45. Tsuji T, Morasso PG, Goto K, Ito K (1995) Human hand impedance characteristics during maintained posture. Biol Cybern 72:475–485Google Scholar
  46. Von Holst E (1950/1973) Daz reafferezprincip: Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnerven-system und Peripherie. In: Martin R (ed) The behavioural physiology of animals and men; the collected papers of Erich Von Holst, vol 1. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, pp 139–173Google Scholar
  47. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Kawato M (1998) Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cognit Sci 2:338–347Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe S. Archambault
    • 1
    • 4
    • 4
  • Pavel Mihaltchev
    • 2
  • Mindy F. Levin
    • 2
    • 3
  • Anatol G. Feldman
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre de Recherche en Sciences NeurologiquesUniversité de MontréalMontreal, QuebecCanada
  2. 2.École de RéadaptationUniversité de MontréalMontreal, QuebecCanada
  3. 3.CRIR, Institut de Réadaptation de MontréalUniversité de MontréalMontreal, QuebecCanada
  4. 4.Dipartimento di Fisiologia Umana e FarmacologiaUniversità di Roma ‘La Sapienza’RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations