Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 162, Issue 4, pp 537–542 | Cite as

Saccadic adaptation shifts the pre-saccadic attention focus

  • Karine Doré-Mazars
  • Thérèse Collins
Research Note


The well-documented phenomenon of the spatial coupling between saccadic programming and the orienting of attention refers to the fact that visual attention is directed toward the location that the eyes are aiming for. However, the question remains open as to whether saccades and attention are two independent processes that can be directed concurrently toward a common goal, or whether their relationship is tighter, with the motor components of the saccade program influencing the selection of the position towards which visual attention is directed. To investigate this issue, an experiment was carried out in which the initial saccade goal was dissociated from the final executed motor vector. This was done by using a saccadic adaptation paradigm and a discrimination task. Results showed that best perceptual performance, which is taken to be an indicator of the locus of visual attention, followed the motor modifications arising from saccadic adaptation. This suggests that visual attention is directed toward the actual saccade landing position and that the perceptual system must have access to information regarding the motor vector before saccade execution.


Saccade Plasticity Perception 


  1. Bach M, Bouis D, Fischer B (1983) An accurate and linear infrared oculometer. J Neurosci Methods 9:9–14Google Scholar
  2. Bahcall D, Kowler E (1999) Illusory shifts in visual direction accompany adaptation of saccadic eye movements. Nature 26:864–866Google Scholar
  3. Beauvillain C, Beauvillain P (1995) Calibration of an eye-movement system for use in reading. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 27:331–337Google Scholar
  4. Beauvillain C, Pouget P, Kirchner H (2003) Temporal and spatial coupling of selection-for-perception and selection-for-action. Perception 32(Suppl):24–25Google Scholar
  5. Deubel H (1995) Separate adaptive mechanisms for the control of reactive and volitional saccadic eye movements. Vision Res 35(23–24):3529–3540Google Scholar
  6. Deubel H (1999) Separate adaptive mechanism for the control of reactive, volitional, and memory-guided saccadic eye movements. In: Gopher D, Koriat A (eds) Attention and performance XVII. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Deubel H, Schneider WX (1996) Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Res 36:1827–1837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deubel H, Wolf W, Hauske G (1986) Adaptive gain control of saccadic eye movements. Hum Neurobiol 5:245–253Google Scholar
  9. Ditterich J, Eggert T, Straube A (2000a) Relation between the metrics of the presaccadic attention shift and the saccade before and after adaptation. J Neurophysiol 84:1809–1813Google Scholar
  10. Ditterich J, Eggert T, Straube A (2000b) The role of the attention focus in visual information processing underlying saccadic adaptation. Vision Res 40:1125–1134Google Scholar
  11. Doré-Mazars K, Pouget P, Beauvillain C (2004) Attentional selection during preparation of eye movements. Psychol Res 69:67–76Google Scholar
  12. Fischer B (1986) The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided eye movements in monkey and man. Psychol Res 48:251–257Google Scholar
  13. Gancarz G, Grossberg S (1999) A neural model of saccadic eye movement control explains task-specific adaptation. Vision Res 39:3123–3143Google Scholar
  14. Hoffman J, Subramaniam B (1995) The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys 57:787–795PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hopp JJ, Fuchs AF (2002) Investigating the site of human saccadic adaptation with express and targeting saccades. Exp Brain Res 144:538–548Google Scholar
  16. Hopp JJ, Fuchs AF (2004) The characteristics and neuronal substrate of saccadic eye movement plasticity. Prog Neurobiol 72(1):27–53Google Scholar
  17. Kowler E, Anderson E, Dosher B, Blaser E (1995) The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Res 35:1897–1916CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kustov A, Robinson D (1996) Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements. Nature 384:74–77Google Scholar
  19. Lynch J, Hoover J, Strick P (1994) Input to the frontal eye field from the substantia nigra, superior colliculus, and dentate nucleus demonstrated by transneuronal transport. Exp Brain Res 100:181–186Google Scholar
  20. Mack A, Fendrich R, Pleune J (1978) Adaptation to an altered relation between retinal image displacements and saccadic eye movements. Vision Res 14:1321–1327Google Scholar
  21. McFadden SA, Khan A, Wallman J (2002) Gain adaptation of exogenous shifts of visual attention. Vision Res 42(24):2709–2726Google Scholar
  22. McLaughlin S (1967) Parametric adjustment in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys 2:359–362Google Scholar
  23. Moidell B, Bedell H (1988) Changes in oculocentric visual direction induced by the recalibration. Vision Res 28(2):329–336Google Scholar
  24. Moore T, Fallah M (2001) Control of eye movements and spatial attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(3):1273–1276Google Scholar
  25. Moore T, Fallah M (2004) Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention. J Neurophysiol 91:152–162Google Scholar
  26. Noto C, Robinson F (2001) Visual error is the stimulus for saccadic gain adaptation. Cogn Brain Res 12(2):301–305Google Scholar
  27. Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Rivaud S, Gaymard B, Muri R, Vermersch A (1995) Cortical control of saccades. Ann Neurol 37(5):557–567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (1998) Spatial attention: mechanisms and theories. In: Sabourin M, Craik F (eds) Advances in psychological science, vol 2: Biological and cognitive aspects. Psychology Press, Montreal, pp 171–198Google Scholar
  29. Schall J (2004) On the role of frontal eye field in guiding attention and saccades. Vision Res 44:1453–1467Google Scholar
  30. Seeberger T, Noto C, Robinson F (2002) Non-visual information does not drive saccadic gain adaptation in monkeys. Brain Res 956(2):374–379Google Scholar
  31. Sommer M, Wurtz R (1998) Frontal eye field neurons orthodromically activated from the superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 80:3331–3333Google Scholar
  32. Sommer M, Wurtz R (2002) A pathway in primate brain for internal monitoring of movements. Science 296:1480–1482Google Scholar
  33. Sommer M, Wurtz R (2004a) What the brain stem tells the frontal cortex I: Oculomotor signals sent from superior colliculus to frontal eye field via mediodorsal thalamus. J Neurophysiol 91:1381–1402Google Scholar
  34. Sommer M, Wurtz R (2004b) What the brain stem tells the frontal cortex II: Role of the SC-MD-FEF pathway in corollary discharge. J Neurophysiol 91:1403–1423Google Scholar
  35. Tanaka M (2003) Contribution of signals downstream from adaptation to saccade programming. J Neurophysiol 90:2080–2086Google Scholar
  36. Wurtz R, Sommer M (2004) Identifying corollary discharges for movement in the primate brain. Prog Brain Res 144:47–60Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Psychologie ExpérimentaleUniversité René Descartes Paris 5Boulogne Billancourt CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations