Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 169, Issue 2, pp 272–278 | Cite as

Control of adaptive locomotion: effect of visual obstruction and visual cues in the environment

  • Shirley RietdykEmail author
  • Chris K. Rhea
Research Note

Abstract

Visual information regarding obstacle position and size is used for planning and controlling adaptive gait. However, the manner in which visual cues in the environment are used in the control of gait is not fully known. This research examined the effect of obstacle position cues on the lead and trail limb trajectories during obstacle avoidance with and without visual information of the lower limbs and obstacle (termed visual exproprioception). Eight subjects stepped over obstacles under four visual conditions: full vision without obstacle position cues, full vision with position cues, goggles without position cues and goggles with position cues. Goggles obstructed visual exproprioception of the lower limbs and the obstacle. Position cues (2 m tall) were placed beside the obstacle to provide visual cues regarding obstacle position. Obstacle heights were 2, 10, 20 and 30 cm. When wearing goggles and without position cues, a majority of the dependent measures (horizontal distance, toe clearance and lead stride length) increased for the 10, 20 and 30 cm obstacles. Therefore lower limb–obstacle visual exproprioception was important for the control of both limbs, even though with normal vision the trail limb was not visible during obstacle clearance. When wearing goggles, the presence of position cues, which provided on-line visual exproprioception of the self relative to the obstacle position in the anterior–posterior direction, returned lead and trail foot placements to full vision values. Lead toe clearance was not affected by the position cues, trail clearance decreased but was greater than values observed during full vision. Therefore, visual exproprioception of obstacle location, provided by visual cues in the environment, was more relevant than visual exproprioception of the lower limbs for controlling lead and trail foot placement.

Keywords

Gait adaptations Stability Vision Locomotion 

References

  1. Chen HC, Ashton-Miller JA, Alexander NB, Schultz AB (1991) Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults. J Gerontol 46:M196–M203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chou LS, Draganich LF (1998) Placing the trailing foot closer to an obstacle reduces flexion of the hip, knee, and ankle to increase the risk of tripping. J Biomech 31:685–691CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Krigolson O, Heath M (2004) Background visual cues and memory-guided reaching. Hum Mov Sci 23:861–867CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Laurent M, Thomson JA (1988) The role of visual information in control of a constrained locomotor task. J Mot Behav 20:17–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee DN, Lishman JR, Thomson JA (1982) Regulation of gait in long jumping. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 8:448–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mohagheghi AA, Moraes R, Patla AE (2004) The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion. Exp Brain Res 155:459–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Patla AE (1998) How is human gait controlled by vision? Ecol Psychol 10:287–302Google Scholar
  8. Patla AE, Rietdyk S (1993) Visual control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion: effect of obstacle height and width. Gait Posture 1:45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Patla AE, Vickers JN (1997) Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path? Neuroreport 8:3661–3665PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Patla AE, Rietdyk S, Martin C, Prentice S (1996) Locomotor patterns of the leading and the trailing limbs as solid and fragile obstacles are stepped over: some insights into the role of vision during locomotion. J Mot Behav 28:35–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Perry SD, Patla AE (2001) On-line adjustments to body center of mass and limb elevation to suddenly changing obstacle height. In: Duysens J, Smits-Engelsman BM, Kingma H (eds) Control of posture and gait. Masstricht, Netherlands, pp 485–487Google Scholar
  12. Rhea C, Rietdyk S (2005) Gait adaptation: lead toe clearance continually decreased over multiple exposures with and without on-line visual information. In: Proceedings of the XX congress of the international society of biomechanicsGoogle Scholar
  13. Rietdyk S, McGlothlin JD, Williams J, Baria A (2005) Proactive stability control while carrying loads and negotiating an elevated surface. Exp Brain Res 165:44–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Vallis LA, McFadyen BJ (2005) Children use different anticipatory control strategies than adults to circumvent an obstacle in the travel path. Exp Brain Res 167:119–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health and KinesiologyPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations