Adaptation to visual feedback delays in manual tracking: evidence against the Smith Predictor model of human visually guided action
- 575 Downloads
We report adaptation to delayed visual feedback during a manual tracking task, testing the nature of the adapted responses with frequency analysis. Two groups of seven subjects tracked unpredictable targets using a handheld joystick, alternating between pursuit and compensatory display trials. The test group then practised for 1 h per day with a visual feedback delay of 300 ms; the control group practice under normal undelayed conditions. Introduction of the visual feedback delay significantly disrupted tracking performance, with an increase in errors and a reduction in frequency of corrective movements. Subjects showed clear evidence of adaptation during the 5 day experiment, decreasing tracking error and decreasing the mean power of intermittent corrections. However, there was no evidence of a return towards the initial high frequency intermittent tracking. We suggest that the adaptation observed in this study reflects the modification of predictive feedforward actions, but that these data do not support control based on Smith Prediction.
KeywordsVisual Feedback Tracking Error Error Score Catch Trial Tracking Mode
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust. JKJ was partly supported by the School of Psychology. We thank Jonathan Winter for expert technical assistance.
- Miall RC (1996) Task-dependent changes in visual feedback control: a frequency analysis of human manual tracking. J Motor Behav 28:125–135Google Scholar
- Miall RC, Weir DJ, Stein JF (1993a) Intermittency in human manual tracking tasks. J Motor Behav 25:53–63Google Scholar
- Miall RC, Weir DJ, Wolpert DM, Stein JF (1993b) Is the cerebellum a Smith predictor? J Motor Behav 25:203–216Google Scholar
- Pew RW, Duffendack JC, Fensch LK (1967) Temporal limitations in human motor control. Psychonomic Society, Human Performanance Centre, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
- Poulton EC (1974) Tracking skill and manual control. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Smith OJM (1959) A controller to overcome dead time. ISA J 6:28–33Google Scholar
- Weir DJ, Stein JF, Miall RC (1989) Cues and control strategies in visually guided tracking. J Motor Behav 21(3):185–204Google Scholar