Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 168, Issue 1–2, pp 307–311 | Cite as

Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback

  • Daniel J. Goble
  • Colleen A. Lewis
  • Susan H. BrownEmail author
Research Note

Abstract

Despite the importance of proprioception during upper limb movement, the extent to which arm/hemisphere asymmetries exist in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback remains unclear. In the present study, movement accuracy and arm dynamics were examined in 20 right-handed adults during a proprioceptive matching task that required subjects to actively match remembered target positions of the elbow with the contralateral arm. As hypothesized, the results indicated an accuracy advantage in favor of the non-preferred left arm reflected by smaller absolute matching errors when compared to the preferred right arm. This advantage was most pronounced for larger amplitude movements and was not associated with any limb-specific difference in movement strategy as indicated by the dynamics of the matching movement. These results extend current theories of handedness by demonstrating that, in right-handed individuals, the non-preferred arm/hemisphere system is more adept at utilizing position-related proprioceptive information than the preferred arm/hemisphere system.

Keywords

Handedness Kinematics Hemispheric specialization Human movement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to J. Chesney for his assistance with the data collection and analysis aspects of this project.

References

  1. Annett J, Annett M, Hudson PT, Turner A (1979) The control of movement in the preferred and non-preferred hands. Q J Exp Psychol 31:641–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL (2003) Nondominant arm advantages in load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements. J Neurophysiol 90:1503–1513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carnahan H, Elliott D (1987) Pedal asymmetry in the reproduction of spatial locations. Cortex 23:157–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Carson RG, Elliott D, Goodman D, Dickinson J (1990) Manual asymmetries in the reproduction of a 3-dimensional spatial location. Neuropsychologia 28:99–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carson RG, Goodman D, Chua R, Elliott D (1993) Asymmetries in the regulation of visually guided aiming. J Mot Behav 25:21–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman CD, Heath MD, Westwood DA, Roy EA (2001) Memory for kinesthetically defined target location: evidence for manual asymmetries. Brain Cogn 46:62–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colley A (1984) Spatial location judgements by right and left-handers. Cortex 20:47–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cordo P, Carlton L, Bevan L, Carlton M, Kerr GK (1994) Proprioceptive coordination of movement sequences: role of velocity and position information. J Neurophysiol 71:1848–1861PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott D, Weeks DJ, Jones R (1986) Lateral asymmetries in finger-tapping by adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome. Am J Ment Defic 90:472–475PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliott D, Heath M, Binsted G, Ricker KL, Roy EA, Chua R (1999) Goal-directed aiming: correcting a force-specification error with the right and left hands. J Mot Behav 31:309–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flowers K (1975) Handedness and controlled movement. Br J Psychol 66:39–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Goble DJ, Lewis CA, Hurvitz EA, Brown SH (2005) Development of upper limb proprioceptive accuracy in children and adolescents. Hum Mov Sci 24:155–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haaland KY, Harrington D (1989a) The role of the hemispheres in closed loop movements. Brain Cogn 9:158–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haaland KY, Harrington DL (1989b) Hemispheric control of the initial and corrective components of aiming movements. Neuropsychologia 27:961–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kawato M (1999) Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:718–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lonn J, Crenshaw AG, Djupsjobacka M, Pedersen J, Johansson H (2000) Position sense testing: influence of starting position and type of displacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:592–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mieschke PE, Elliott D, Helsen WF, Carson RG, Coull JA (2001) Manual asymmetries in the preparation and control of goal-directed movements. Brain Cogn 45:129–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mima T, Sadato N, Yazawa S, Hanakawa T, Fukuyama H, Yonekura Y, Shibasaki H (1999) Brain structures related to active and passive finger movements in man. Brain 122(Pt 10):1989–1997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Roy EA, MacKenzie C (1978) Handedness effects in kinesthetic spatial location judgements. Cortex 14:250–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Roy EA, Kalbfleisch L, Elliott D (1994) Kinematic analyses of manual asymmetries in visual aiming movements. Brain Cogn 24:289–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sainburg RL (2002) Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 142:241–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sainburg RL, Ghilardi MF, Poizner H, Ghez C (1995) Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. J Neurophysiol 73:820–835PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor HG, Heilman KM (1980) Left-hemisphere motor dominance in righthanders. Cortex 16:587–603PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang J, Sainburg RL (2003) Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations. Exp Brain Res 149:520–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang J, Sainburg RL (2004) Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations. Exp Brain Res 155:1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS (1995) Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements. Exp Brain Res 105:163–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel J. Goble
    • 1
  • Colleen A. Lewis
    • 1
  • Susan H. Brown
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Motor Control Laboratory, Division of KinesiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations