Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 171, Issue 1, pp 91–98 | Cite as

Longer fixation duration while viewing face images

  • Kun Guo
  • Sasan Mahmoodi
  • Robert G. Robertson
  • Malcolm P. Young
Research Article


The spatio-temporal properties of saccadic eye movements can be influenced by the cognitive demand and the characteristics of the observed scene. Probably due to its crucial role in social communication, it is argued that face perception may involve different cognitive processes compared with non-face object or scene perception. In this study, we investigated whether and how face and natural scene images can influence the patterns of visuomotor activity. We recorded monkeys’ saccadic eye movements as they freely viewed monkey face and natural scene images. The face and natural scene images attracted similar number of fixations, but viewing of faces was accompanied by longer fixations compared with natural scenes. These longer fixations were dependent on the context of facial features. The duration of fixations directed at facial contours decreased when the face images were scrambled, and increased at the later stage of normal face viewing. The results suggest that face and natural scene images can generate different patterns of visuomotor activity. The extra fixation duration on faces may be correlated with the detailed analysis of facial features.


Eye movement Face image Natural scene Monkey 



This work is supported by Wellcome Trust, HFSPO and EU FP5.


  1. Anderson JR (1998) Social stimuli and social rewards in primate learning and cognition. Behav Process 42:159–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrew RJ (1963) Evolution of facial expressions. Science 142:1034–1041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews TJ, Coppola DM (1999) Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments. Vis Res 39:2947–2953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G (1996) Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 8:551–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biederman I (1987) Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 94:115–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruce V, Young A (1998) In the eye of the beholder. Oxford University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Burton AM, Bruce V, Dench N (1993) What’s the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement. Perception 22:153–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Cooper DH, Graham J (1992) Training models of shapes from sets of examples. In: Proceedings of British machine vision conference, pp 9–18Google Scholar
  9. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ (1992) Active shape models, ‘Smart Snakes’. In: Proceedings of British machine vision conference, pp 266–275Google Scholar
  10. Einhäuser W, König P (2003) Does luminance-contrast contribute to a saliency map for overt visual attention? Eur J Neurosci 17:1089–1097PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emery NJ (2000) The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24:581–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epelboim J, Steinman R, Kowler E, Edwards M, Pizlo Z, Erkelens C, Collewijn H (1995) The function of visual search and memory in sequential looking tasks. Vis Res 35:3401–3422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farah MJ (1996) Is face recognition ‘special’? Evidence from neuropsychology. Behav Brain Res 76:181–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fellous JM (1997) Gender discrimination and prediction on the basis of facial metric information. Vis Res 37:1961–1973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Field DJ (1987) Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am A 4:2379–2394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gauthier I, Skudlarski P, Gore JC, Anderson AW (2000) Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat Neurosci 3:191–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Anderson AW, Skudlarski P, Gore JC (1999) Activation of the middle fusiform ‘face area’ increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nat Neurosci 2:568–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guo K, Benson PJ (1998) Involuntary eye movements in response to first- and second-order motion. Neuroreport 9:3543–3548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo K, Robertson RG, Mahmoodi S, Tadmor Y, Young MP (2003) How do monkeys view faces? – A study of eye movements. Exp Brain Res 150:363–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Henderson JM (2003) Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends Cognit Sci 7:498–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Henderson JM, Hollingworth A (1999) High-level scene perception. Annu Rev Psychol 50:243–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henderson JM, Weeks PA, Hollingworth A (1999) Effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during scene viewing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:210–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hooge IThC, Erkelens CJ (1998) Adjustment of fixation duration in visual search. Vis Res 38:1295–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Itier RJ, Taylor MJ (2004) N170 or N1? Spatial temporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebr Cortex 14:132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobs AM (1986) Eye-movement control in visual search: How direct is visual span control? Percept Psychophys 39:47–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson MH, Morton J (1991) Biology and cognitive development: the case of face recognition. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Kreyszig E (1999) Advanced engineering mathematics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Krieger G, Rentschler I, Hauske G, Schill K, Zetzsche C (2000) Object and scene analysis by saccadic eye-movements: an investigation with higher-order statistics. Spat Vis 13:201–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maurer D, Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ (2002) The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn Sci 6:255–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCarthy G, Puce A, Gore JC, Allison T (1997) Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J Cogn Neurosci 9:605–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mendelson MJ, Haith MM, Goldman-Rakic PS (1982) Face scanning and responsiveness to social cues in infant rhesus monkeys. Dev Psychol 18:222–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moffit K (1980) Evaluation of fixation duration in visual search. Percept Psychophys 274:370–372Google Scholar
  33. Moscovitch M, Winocur G, Behrmann M (1997) What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 9:555–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parkhurst D, Law K, Niebur E (2002) Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vis Res 42:107–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parkhurst DJ, Niebur E (2003) Scene content selected by active vision. Spat Vis 16:125–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parr LA, Winslow JT, Hopkins WD (2000) Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (macaca mulatta). J Comp Psychol 114:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S (1994) Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368:239–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pollatsek A, Rayner K, Balota DA (1986) Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Percept Psychophys 40:123–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Reinagel P, Zador AM (1999) Natural scene statistics at the centre of gaze. Network Comput Neural Syst 10:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenfeld SA, Van Hoesen GW (1979) Face recognition in the rhesus monkey. Neuropsychologia 17:503–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rossion B, Gauthier I (2002) How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 1:63–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rousselet GA, Mace MJ, Fabre-Thorpe M (2004) Spatiotemporal analyses of the N170 for human faces, animal faces and objects in natural scenes. Neuroreport 15:2607–2611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruderman DL, Bialek W (1994) Statistics of natural images: scaling in the woods. Phys Rev Lett 73:814–817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salthouse TA, Ellis CL, Diener DC, Somberg BL (1981) Stimulus processing during eye fixation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 73:611–623Google Scholar
  45. Sergent J, Signoret JL (1992) Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia. Cerebr Cortex 2:375–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sergent J, Otha S, MacDonald B (1992) Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. Brain 115:15–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simoncelli EP, Olshausen BA (2001) Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:1193–1216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tanaka K (1997) Mechanisms of visual object recognition: monkey and human studies. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7:523–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tarr MJ, Cheng YD (2003) Learning to see faces and objects. Trends Cogn Sci 7:23–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsao DY, Freiwald WA, Knutsen TA, Mandeville JB, Tootell RB (2003) Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex. Nat Neurosci 6:989–995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turati C, Simion F, Milani I, Umiltà C (2002) Newborns’ preference for faces: what is crucial? Dev Psychol 38:875–882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Diepen PMJ (1995) Chronometry of foveal information extraction during scene perception. In: Findlay JM, Walker R, Kentridge RW (eds) Eye movement research: mechanisms, processes and applications. Elsevier, North-Holland, pp 349–362Google Scholar
  53. Valentine T (1988) Upside-down faces: a review of the effects of inversion upon face recognition. Br J Psychol 79:471–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Yarbus A (1967) Eye movements and vision. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Yin RK (1969) Looking at upside-down faces. J Exp Psychol 81:41–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Young MP, Yamane S (1992) Sparse population coding of faces in inferior temporal cortex. Science 256:1327–1331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kun Guo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sasan Mahmoodi
    • 1
  • Robert G. Robertson
    • 1
  • Malcolm P. Young
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of NewcastleNewcastle upon TyneUK
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of LincolnLincolnUK

Personalised recommendations