Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 167, Issue 3, pp 462–467 | Cite as

Training BIG to move faster: the application of the speed–amplitude relation as a rehabilitation strategy for people with Parkinson’s disease

Research Note

Abstract

We have used the phenomenon that speed increases with movement amplitude as a rehabilitation strategy. We tested the hypothesis that the generalized training of amplitude in the limb motor system may reduce bradykinesia and hypokinesia in the upper and lower limbs in subjects with Parkinson’s disease (PD) across disease severity (Stage I, n=6; Stage II, n=7; Stage III, n=5). While studies have separately examined the relationship of amplitude to speed in reaching and gait, the same study has not reported the relationship for both limb systems. Moreover, the rehabilitation intervention, Training BIG, is unique in that it applies well-established treatment concepts from a proven treatment for the speech motor system in PD [Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT®)] to the limb motor system. Subjects (n=18) participated in intense practice (1-h sessions/4× week/4 weeks) of large amplitude movements involving the whole body (i.e., head, arm, trunk, and leg) while focusing on the sensory awareness of “movement bigness.” Testing procedures were designed to demonstrate the transfer of generalized amplitude practice to speed improvements during functional “untrained” tasks in “uncued” conditions with blinded testers. After therapy, the subjects significantly increased their speed of reaching and gait for the preferred speed condition. This effect was greater when the severity of the disease was less. The results support further application and efficacy studies of Training BIG. Amplitude-based behavioral intervention in people with PD appears to be a simple target that may be applied in different contexts for multiple tasks and results in improved speed–amplitude scaling relations across the upper and lower limbs.

Keywords

Bradykinesia Reaching Gait Exercise Cueing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH grant R21 NS043711-04A1. Statistical assistance was provided by Janet Telfer. Special thanks to Michelle Prior and Tara McIsaac for their assistance with data collection and coordination, and to all the subjects that volunteered their time to participate in this study.

References

  1. Behrman AL, Teitelbaum P, Cauraugh JH (1998) Verbal instructional sets to normalize the temporal and spatial gait variables in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 65:580–582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berardelli A, Dick JPR, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Marsden CD (1986) Scaling of the amplitude of the first agonist EMG burst during rapid wrist movements in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49:1273–1279PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown SHC, Cooke JD (1981) Amplitude- and instruction-dependent modulation of movement-related electromyogram activity in humans. J Physiol 316:97–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buneo CA, Soechting JF, Flanders M (1994) Muscle activation patterns for reaching: the representation of distance and time. J Neurophys 71(4):1546–1558Google Scholar
  5. Farley BG, Sherman S, Koshland GF (2004) Shoulder muscle activity in Parkinson’s disease during multijoint arm movements across a range of speeds. Exp Brain Res 154:160–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher B, Petzinger G, Nixon K, Hogg E, Bremmer S, Meshul C, Jakowec M (2004) Exercise-induced behavioral recovery and neuroplasticity in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-lesioned mouse basal ganglia. J Neurosci Res 77:378–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Flowers K (1975) Ballistic and corrective movements on an aiming task. Neurology 25:413–421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Formisano R, Pratesi L, Modarelli F, Bonifati V, Meco G (1992) Rehabilitation and Parkinson’s disease. Scand J Rehabil Med 24:157–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fox C, Morrison C, Ramig L (2002) Current perspectives on the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) for individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 11:111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freund HJ, Budingen HJ (1978) The relationship between speed and amplitude of the fastest voluntary contractions of human arm muscles. Exp Brain Res 31:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hallett M, Khoshbin S (1980) A physiological mechanism of bradykinesia. Brain 103:301–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD (1967) Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology 17:427–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffman DS, Strick PL (1986) Step-tracking movements of the wrist in humans. I. Kinematic analysis. J Neurosci 6(11):3309–3318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Horak FB, Frank J, Nutt J (1996) Effects of dopamine on postural control in Parkinsonian subjects: scaling, set, and tone. J Neurophysiol 75(6):2380–2396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jobges M, Heuschkel G, Pretzel C, Illhardt C, Renner C, Hummelsheim (2004) Repetitive training of compensatory steps: a therapeutic approach for postural instability in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:1682–1687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kleinow J, Smith A, Ramig L (2001) Speech motor stability in IDP: effects of rate and loudness manipulations. J Speech Lang Hear Res 44:1041–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lehman DA, Toole T, Lofald D, Hirsch MA (2005) Training with verbal instructional cues results in near-term improvement of gait in people with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther 29(1):2–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis GN, Byblow WD, Walt SE (2000) Stride length regulation in Parkinson’s disease: the use of extrinsic, visual cues. Brain 123:2077–2090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Liotti M, Vogel D, Ramig L, New P, Cook C, Fox P (2003) Functional reorganization of speech-motor function in Parkinson disease following LSVT®: a PET study. Neurology 60:432–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ma HI, Trombly CA, Wagenaar RC, Tickle-Degnen L (2004) Effect of one single auditory cue on movement kinematics in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 83:530–536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Morris ME, Iansek R, Matyas TA, Summers JJ (1994) The pathogenesis of gait hypokinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 117:1161–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ostry DJ, Cooke JD, Munhall KG (1987) Velocity curves of human arm and speech movements. Exp Brain Res 68(1):37–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pfann KD, Hoffman DS, Gottlieb GL, Strick PL, Corcos DM (1998) Common principles underlying the control of rapid, single degree-of-freedom movements at different joints. Exp Brain Res 118:35–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pfann KD, Buchman AS, Comella CL, Corcos DM (2001) Control of movement distance in Parkinson’s disease. Move Disord 16(6):1048–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Phillips JG, Martin KE, Bradshaw JL, Iansek R (1994) Could bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease simply be compensation? J Neurol 241:439–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramig L, Sapir S, Baker K, Hinds S, Spielman J, Brisbie A, Stathopoulos E, El-Sharkawi A, Logemann J, Fox C, Johnson A, Borod J, Luschei E, Smith M (2000) The “big picture” on the role of phonation in the treatment of individuals with motor speech disorders: or “what’s up with loud?” Paper presented at the Motor Speech Conference, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramig L, Sapir S, Countryman S, Pawlas A, O’Brien C, Hoehn M, Thompson L (2001) Intensive voice treatment (LSVT) for individuals with Parkinson disease”: a two-year follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71:493–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sheridan MR, Flowers KA (1990) Movement variability and bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 113:1149–1161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Suteerawattananon M, Morris GS, Etnyre BR, Jankovic J, Protas EJ (2004) Effects of visual and auditory cues on gait in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 219:63–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Taub E (2004) Harnessing brain plasticity through behavioral techniques to produce new treatments in neurorehabilitation. Am Psychol 8:692–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teasdale N, Phillips J, Stelmach GE (1990) Temporal movement control in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 53:862–868PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Teulings HLO, Stelmach GE (1991) Control of stroke amplitude, peak acceleration, and Stroke duration in Parkinsonian handwriting. Human Mov Sci 10:315–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tillerson J, Cohen A, Philhower J, Miller G, Zigmond M, Schallert T (2001) Forced limb-use effects on the behavioral and neurochemical effects of 6-hydroxydopamine. J Neurosci 21(12):4427–4435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tillerson J, Cohen A, Caudle M, Zigmond M, Schallert T, Miller G (2002) Forced nonuse in unilateral Parkinsonian rats exacerbates injury. J Neurosci 22(15):6790–6799PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Gemmert AWA, Adler CH, Stelmach GE (2003) Parkinson’s disease patients undershoot target amplitude in handwriting and similar tasks. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:1502–1508CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zijlstra W, Rutgers AWF, Hof AL, Van Weerden TW (1995) Voluntary and involuntary adaptation of walking to temporal and spatial constraints. Gait Posture 3:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zijlstra W, Rutgers AWF, Van Weerden TW (1998) Voluntary and involuntary adaptation of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Gait Posture 7:53–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations