Visual-tactile saccadic inhibition
- 123 Downloads
In an eye movement countermanding paradigm it is demonstrated for the first time that a tactile stimulus can be an effective stop signal when human participants are to inhibit saccades to a visual target. Estimated stop signal processing times were 90–140 ms, comparable to results with auditory stop signals, but shorter than those commonly found for manual responses. Two of the three participants significantly slowed their reactions in expectation of the stop signal as revealed by a control experiment without stop signals. All participants produced slower responses in the shortest stop signal delay condition than predicted by the race model (Logan and Cowan 1984) along with hypometric saccades on stop failure trials, suggesting that the race model may need to be elaborated to include some component of interaction of stop and go signal processing.
KeywordsStop Signal Tactile Stimulus Delay Condition Race Model Saccadic Amplitude
The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful comments by the reviewers. This research was supported by the International Graduate School in Neurosensory Systems and Science, Oldenburg University (German Science Foundation, DFG).
- Boucher L, Logan GD, Palmeri TJ, Schall JD (2003). An interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Poster presentation, Soc for Neurosci, New OrleansGoogle Scholar
- Donders FC (1868/1969) On the speed of mental processes. (WH Koster, trans.) In: Koster WH (ed) Attention and performance II. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 412–431Google Scholar
- Logan GD (1994) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a user’s guide to the countermanding paradigm. In: Dagenbach D, Carr TH (eds) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. Academic, San Diego, pp 189–239Google Scholar
- Ollman RT (1973) Simple reactions with random countermanding of the ‘go’-signal. In: Kornblum S (ed) Attention and performance IV. Academic, New York, pp 571–581Google Scholar
- Todd JW (1912) Reaction to multiple stimuli. The Science Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Vince MA (1948) The intermittency of control movements and the psychological refractory period. Br J Psychol 38:149–157Google Scholar