Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 169, Issue 4, pp 554–563 | Cite as

Visual-tactile saccadic inhibition

  • Annika Åkerfelt
  • Hans ColoniusEmail author
  • Adele Diederich
Research Article

Abstract

In an eye movement countermanding paradigm it is demonstrated for the first time that a tactile stimulus can be an effective stop signal when human participants are to inhibit saccades to a visual target. Estimated stop signal processing times were 90–140 ms, comparable to results with auditory stop signals, but shorter than those commonly found for manual responses. Two of the three participants significantly slowed their reactions in expectation of the stop signal as revealed by a control experiment without stop signals. All participants produced slower responses in the shortest stop signal delay condition than predicted by the race model (Logan and Cowan 1984) along with hypometric saccades on stop failure trials, suggesting that the race model may need to be elaborated to include some component of interaction of stop and go signal processing.

Keywords

Stop Signal Tactile Stimulus Delay Condition Race Model Saccadic Amplitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful comments by the reviewers. This research was supported by the International Graduate School in Neurosensory Systems and Science, Oldenburg University (German Science Foundation, DFG).

References

  1. Amlôt R,Walker R, Driver J, Spence C (2003) Multimodal visual-somatosensory integration in saccade generation. Neuropsychologia 41:1–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asrress KN, Carpenter RHS (2001) Saccadic countermanding: a comparison of central and peripheral stop signals. Vision Res 4:2645–2651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Band GPH, van der Molen MW, Logan GD (2003) Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychol 112:105–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boucher L, Logan GD, Palmeri TJ, Schall JD (2003). An interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Poster presentation, Soc for Neurosci, New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabel DWJ, Armstrong IT, Reingold E, Munoz DP (2000) Control of saccade inhibition in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals. Exp Brain Res 133:431–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colonius H (1990) A note on the stop-signal paradigm, or how to observe the unobservable. Psychol Rev 97:309–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colonius H, Diederich A (2004) Multisensory interaction in saccadic reaction time: a time-window-of-integration model. J Cog Neurosci 16:1000–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colonius H, Özyurt J, Arndt PA (2001) Countermanding saccades with auditory stop signals: testing the race model. Vision Res 41:1951–1968PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curtis CE, Cole MW, Rao VY, D’Esposito M (2005) Canceling planned action: an fMRI study of countermanding saccades. Cereb Cortex 15:1281–1289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diederich A (1995) Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: evaluation of counter and diffusion coactivation models. J Math Psychol 39:197–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diederich A, Colonius H (2004) Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time. Percept Psychophys 66(8):1388–1404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Diederich A, Colonius H, Bockhorst D, Tabeling S (2003) Visual-tactile spatial interaction in saccade generation. Exp Brain Res 148:328–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Donders FC (1868/1969) On the speed of mental processes. (WH Koster, trans.) In: Koster WH (ed) Attention and performance II. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 412–431Google Scholar
  14. Doyle M, Walker R (2002) Multisensory interactions in saccade target selection: curved saccade trajectories. Exp Brain Res 142:116–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Findlay JM,Walker R (1999) A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behav Brain Sci 22:661–721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer B, Weber H (1993) Express saccades and visual attention. Behav Brain Sci 16:553–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanes DP, Carpenter RHS (1999) Countermanding saccades in humans. Vision Res 39:2777–2791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanes DP, Schall JD (1995) Countermanding saccades in macaque. Vis Neurosci 12:929–937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kok A, Ramautar JR, de Ruiter MB, Band GPH, Ridderinkhof KR (2004) ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology 41:9–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lappin JS, Eriksen CW (1966) Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction time response. J Exp Psychol 72:805–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Logan GD (1994) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a user’s guide to the countermanding paradigm. In: Dagenbach D, Carr TH (eds) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. Academic, San Diego, pp 189–239Google Scholar
  22. Logan GD, Cowan WB (1984) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychol Rev 91:295–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Logan GD, Irwin DE (2000) Don’t look! Don’t touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements. Psychon Bull Rev 7:107–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Naito E, Matsumura M (1994) Movement-related potentials associated with motor inhibition as determined by use of a stop signal paradigm in humans. Cog Brain Res 2:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ollman RT (1973) Simple reactions with random countermanding of the ‘go’-signal. In: Kornblum S (ed) Attention and performance IV. Academic, New York, pp 571–581Google Scholar
  26. Özyurt J, Colonius H, Arndt PA (2003) Countermanding saccades: evidence against independent processing of go and stop signal. Percept Psychophys 65:420–428PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Paré M, Hanes DP (2003) Controlled movement processing: superior colliculus activity associated with countermanded saccades. J Neurosci 23:6480–6489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schall JD, Thompson KG (1999) Neural selection and control of visually guided eye movements. Ann Rev Neurosci 22:241–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Todd JW (1912) Reaction to multiple stimuli. The Science Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Vince MA (1948) The intermittency of control movements and the psychological refractory period. Br J Psychol 38:149–157Google Scholar
  31. Williams BR, Ponesse JS, Schachar RJ, Logan GD, Tannock R (1999) Development of inhibitory control across the life span. Dev Psychol 35:205–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annika Åkerfelt
    • 1
  • Hans Colonius
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adele Diederich
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OldenburgOldenburgGermany
  2. 2.International University BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations