Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 168, Issue 1–2, pp 230–240 | Cite as

Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study

Research Article

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to compare prehension movements of the dominant and the non-dominant hand. Twenty right-handed volunteers (age 20–30 years) reached forward to grasp a cylindrical object, which was lifted and then placed into a target position in a retraction–insertion movement. The movements were performed at three different velocities (normal, deliberately fast, or slowly) both, under visual control, and in a no-vision condition. Analysis of the kinematic data revealed that the speed of hand transport influenced pre-shaping of both hands in a similar way. In the visual condition, the grip aperture increased about linearly with peak transport velocity, while it increased non-linearly with shorter movement duration. Comparison of the regression parameters showed that these relationships were nearly identical for both hands. The dominant hand was faster in inserting the object into the target position. Otherwise, no significant inter-manual differences were found. During prehension without visual control, the fingers opened more and movement duration was prolonged. Except for a larger grip aperture of the dominant hand at the end of the acceleration phase, the kinematic data of both hands were again comparable. This invariance was in contrast to performance in fine motor skills such as a pegboard test and drawing movements, where there was a clear advantage of the dominant hand. The similar pre-shaping of both hands during prehension is discussed with regard to a common motor representation of grasping.

Keywords

Human Prehension Arm movement Motor control 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. I. Schröder and Professor M. Illert for their help. This work was financially supported by the Hensel-Stiftung.

References

  1. Annett M (1970) A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol 61:303–321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Annett M (1992) Five tests of hand skill. Cortex 28:583–600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL (2002) Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. J Neurophysiol 88:2408–2421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binkofski F, Dohle C, Posse S, Stephan KM, Hefter H, Seitz RJ, Freund HJ (1998) Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study. Neurology 50:1253–1259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bootsma RJ, Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Zaal FT (1994) The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics. Exp Brain Res 98:535–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Castiello U, Bennett KM (1997) The bilateral reach-to-grasp movement of Parkinson’s disease subjects. Brain 120:593–604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Castiello U, Bennett KM, Stelmach GE (1993) The bilateral reach to grasp movement. Behav Brain Res 56:43–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chieffi S, Gentilucci M (1993) Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 94:471–477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Churchill A, Hopkins B, Rönnqvist L, Vogt S (2000) Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:81–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Corballis MC (1997) The genetics and evolution of handedness. Psychol Rev 104:714–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Culham JC, Danckert SL, DeSouza JF, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA (2003) Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res 153:180–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gentilucci M, Toni I, Daprati E, Gangitano M (1997) Tactile input of the hand and the control of reaching to grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 114:130–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gentilucci M, Benuzzi F, Gangitano M, Grimaldi S (2001) Grasp with hand and mouth: a kinematic study on healthy subjects. J Neurophysiol 86:1685–1699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gentilucci M, Roy AC, Stefanini S (2004) Grasping an object naturally or with a tool: are these tasks guided by a common motor representation ? Exp Brain Res 157:496–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Healey JM, Liederman J, Geschwind N (1986) Handedness is not an unidimensional trait. Cortex 22:33–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeannerod M (1986) The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern. Behav Brain Res 19:99–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeannerod M, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G, Sakata H (1995) Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends Neurosci 18:314–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kawashima R, Matsumura M, Sadato N, Naito E, Waki A, Nakamura S, Matsunami K, Fukuda H, Yonekura Y (1998) Regional cerebral blood flow changes in human brain related to ipsilateral and contralateral complex hand movements – a PET study. Eur J Neurosci 10:2254–2260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Stolze H, Jöhnk K, Boczek-Funcke A, Illert M (1998) Development of prehension movements in children: a kinematic study. Exp Brain Res 122:424–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Sundholm LK, Eliasson AC, Forssberg H (2000) Quantitative assessment of mirror movements in children and adolescents with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 42:728–736CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Mahnkopf C, Holzknecht C, Siebner H, Ulmer S, Jansen O (2003) Effector-independent representations of simple and complex imagined finger movements: a combined fMRI and TMS study. Eur J Neurosci 18:3375–3387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lemon RN (1993) The G. L. Brown Prize Lecture. Cortical control of the primate hand. Exp Physiol 78: 263–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mason AH, Carnahan H (1999) Target viewing time and velocity effects on prehension. Exp Brain Res 127:83–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Matsumura M, Kawashima R, Naito E, Satoh K, Takahashi T, Yanagisawa T, Fukuda H (1996) Changes in rCBF during grasping in humans examined by PET. Neuroreport 7:749–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nelson WL (1983) Physical principles for economies of skilled movements. Biol Cybern 46:135–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Paulignan Y, Frak VG, Toni I, Jeannerod M (1997) Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 114:226–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rizzolatti G, Luppino G (2001) The cortical motor system. Neuron 31:889–901CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sainburg RL (2002) Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 142:241–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sainburg RL, Kalakanis D (2000) Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. J Neurophysiol 83:2661–2675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sainburg RL, Schaefer SY (2004) Interlimb differences in the control of movement extent. J Neurophysiol 92:1374–1383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sakata H, Taira M (1994) Parietal control of hand action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 4:847–856CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Schettino LF, Adamovich SV, Poizner H (2003) Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping. Exp Brain Res 151:158–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Smeets JB, Brenner E (1999) A new view on grasping. Motor Control 3:237–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Smeets JB, Brenner E (2001) Independent movements of the digits in grasping. Exp Brain Res 139:92–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Smyth MM, Peacock KA, Katamba J (2004) The role of sight of the hand in the development of prehension in childhood. Q J Exp Psychol A 57:269–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tresilian JR, Stelmach GE (1997) Common organization for unimanual and bimanual reach-to-grasp tasks. Exp Brain Res 115:283–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wallace SA, Weeks DL (1988) Temporal constraints in the control of prehensile movement. J Mot Behav 20:81–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C (1986) Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav 18:245–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Winges SA, Weber DJ, Santello M (2003) The role of vision on hand preshaping during reach to grasp. Exp Brain Res 152:489–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Grosskopf
    • 1
  • Johann P. Kuhtz-Buschbeck
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhysiologyChristian-Albrechts UniversityKielGermany

Personalised recommendations