Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 168, Issue 1–2, pp 178–185 | Cite as

Early adaptations in somatosensory cortex after focal ischemic injury to motor cortex

  • Joseph S. Paul
  • Sheu Fwu-Shan
  • Andreas R. Luft
Research Article


In response to a lesion, intact regions of cortex in both hemispheres undergo adaptive changes in network function. For example, changes in excitability and intracortical inhibition in primary motor cortex (M1) were reported after lesioning contralateral or ipsilateral brain regions. Close interactions exist between M1 and primary somatosensory cortex (S1) within one hemisphere. Therefore, we hypothesized that lasting modifications would occur in S1 excitability after lesioning ipsilateral M1. Imaging of intrinsic optical signals (IOS, at 570 nm) was used to investigate the evolution of the somatosensory cortical response evoked by contralateral median nerve stimulation during the first hour after a photothrombotic lesion to M1 (caudal motor cortex) of the rat (n=10). Control rats (n=6) received no lesion. Perfusion was monitored by Laser speckle imaging and the extent of the resulting lesion was determined histologically. Control animals did not show evidence for reduced perfusion, infarction, or changes in IOS. M1 infarction led to a significant increase in evoked response amplitude, duration, and area of activation, and a shortening of latencies. These parameters reached a plateau around 50 min after ischemia. These results indicate S1 hyperexcitability after M1 injury. Whether these adaptations contribute to functional deficits or play a role in recovery, remains to be determined.


Ischemia Somatosensory cortex Motor cortex Rat Plasticity Excitability 



This work has been supported jointly by the Academic Research Grant, WBS no. R-397-000-010-112, from the National University of Singapore. Dr. Luft is supported by the IZKF of the University of Tubingen, Germany.


  1. Asanuma H, Arissian K (1984) Experiments on functional role of peripheral input to motor cortex during voluntary movements in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 52: 212–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Asanuma H, Pavlides C (1997) Neurobiological basis of motor learning in mammals. Neuroreport 8: i-viPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boquillon M, Boquillon JP, Bralet J (1992) Photochemically induced, graded cerebral infarction in the mouse by laser irradiation evolution of brain edema. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 27: 1–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bornschlegl M, Asanuma H (1987) Importance of the projection from the sensory to the motor cortex for recovery of motor function following partial thalamic lesion in the monkey. Brain Res 437: 121–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Briers JD, Richards G, He XW (1996) Capillary blood flow monitoring using laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA). J Biomed Opt 4: 164–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchkremer-Ratzmann I, Witte OW (1996) Systemically administered cycloheximide reduces inhibition in rat neocortical slice preparation. Brain Res. 743: 329–332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Buitrago MM, Luft AR, Thakor NV, Blue ME, Hanley DF (2004) Effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on neuronal injury after global hypoxia-ischemia. Exp Brain Res 158: 336–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Byl NN (2004) Focal hand dystonia may result from aberrant neuroplasticity. Adv Neurol 94: 19–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmichael ST, Chesselet MF (2002) Synchronous neuronal activity is a signal for axonal sprouting after cortical lesions in the adult. J Neurosci 22: 6062–6070PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Classen J (2003) Focal hand dystonia–a disorder of neuroplasticity?. Brain 126: 2571–2572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Classen J, Schnitzler A, Binkofski F, Werhahn KJ, Kim YS, Kessler KR, Benecke R (1997) The motor syndrome associated with exaggerated inhibition within the primary motor cortex of patients with hemiparetic. Brain 120(4): 605–619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, Kaplan JD, Parker RA, Kwong KK, Kennedy DN, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR (1997) A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 28: 2518–2527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, Bussel B, Cazalis F, Pierot L, Burnod Y, Maier MA (2002) Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 33: 1610–1617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Frostig RD, Lieke EE, Ts’o DY, Grinvald A (1990) Cortical functional architecture and local coupling between neuronal activity and the microcirculation revealed by in vivo high-resolution optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87: 6082–6086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grinvald A, Shoham D, Shmuel A, Glaser D, Vanzetta I, Shtoyerman E, Slovin H, Wijnbergen C, Hildersheim R, Arieli A (1999) In-vivo optical imaging of cortical architecture and dynamics. In: Windhorst U, Johansson H (eds.). Modern techniques in neuroscience research. Springer, New York, pp. 893–969Google Scholar
  16. Hossmann KA, Mies G, Paschen W, Csiba L, Bodsch W, Rapin JR, Le Poncin-Lafitte M, Takahashi K (1985) Multiparametric imaging of blood flow and metabolism after middle cerebral artery occlusion in cats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 5: 97–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Iriki A, Pavlides C, Keller A, Asanuma H (1989) Long-term potentiation in the motor cortex. Science 245: 1385–1387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaelin-Lang A, Luft AR, Sawaki L, Burstein AH, Sohn YH, Cohen LG (2002) Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input. J Physiol (Lond) 540: 623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keller A, Pavlides C, Asanuma H (1990) Long-term potentiation in the cat somatosensory cortex. Neuroreport 1: 49–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, Trinath T, Oeltermann A (2001) Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412: 150–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Luft AR, Kaelin-Lang A, Hauser TK, Buitrago MM, Thakor NV, Hanley DF, Cohen LG (2002) Modulation of rodent cortical motor excitability by somatosensory input. Exp.Brain Res. 142: 562–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Luft AR, Manto MU, Ben Taib NO (2005) Modulation of motor cortex excitability by sustained peripheral stimulation: the interaction between the motor cortex and the cerebellum. Cerebellum (in press)Google Scholar
  23. Malonek D, Dirnagl U, Lindauer U, Yamada K, Kanno I, Grinvald A (1997) Vascular imprints of neuronal activity: relationships between the dynamics of cortical blood flow, oxygenation, and volume changes following sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 14826–14831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Malonek D, Grinvald A (1997) Vascular regulation at sub millimeter range. Sources of intrinsic signals for high resolution optical imaging. Adv Exp Med Biol 413: 215–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Marshall RS, Perera GM, Lazar RM, Krakauer JW, Constantine RC, DeLaPaz RL (2000) Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 31: 656–661PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mathiesen C, Caesar K, Akgoren N, Lauritzen M (1998) Modification of activity-dependent increases of cerebral blood flow by excitatory synaptic activity and spikes in rat cerebellar cortex. J Physiol 512(2): 555–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Neafsey EJ, Bold EL, Haas G, Hurley-Gius KM, Quirk G, Sievert CF, Terreberry RR (1986) The organization of the rat motor cortex: a microstimulation mapping study. Brain Res 396: 77–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Paperna T, Malach R (1991) Patterns of sensory intermodality relationships in the cerebral cortex of the rat. J Comp Neurol 308: 432–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shimizu T, Hosaki A, Hino T, Sato M, Komori T, Hirai S, Rossini PM (2002) Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. Brain 125: 1896–1907CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Watson BD, Dietrich WD, Busto R, Wachtel MS, Ginsberg MD (1985) Induction of reproducible brain infarction by photochemically initiated thrombosis. Ann Neurol 17: 497–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ziemann U, Hallett M, Cohen LG (1998) Mechanisms of deafferentation-induced plasticity in human motor cortex. J Neurosci 18: 7000–7007PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph S. Paul
    • 1
  • Sheu Fwu-Shan
    • 2
  • Andreas R. Luft
    • 3
  1. 1.Formerly with the Division of Bioengineering, National University of SingaporeDepartment of Bioengineering, Christian Medical CollegeVelloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesNational University of Singapore Singapore
  3. 3.Department of General Neurology, Hertie Inst. for Clinical Brain ResearchUniversity of TübingenTubingenGermany

Personalised recommendations