Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 160, Issue 4, pp 528–532 | Cite as

Long-term physical exercise and somatosensory event-related potentials

  • Masako Iwadate
  • Akio Mori
  • Tomoko Ashizuka
  • Masaki Takayose
  • Toru Ozawa
Research Note

Abstract

We have compared the occurrence patterns of somatosensory event-related potentials (ERPs) in athletes (soccer players) and non-athletes. ERPs were elicited by two oddball tasks following separate somatosensory stimulation at the median nerve (upper-limb task) and at the tibial nerve (lower-limb task). In the athlete group the N140 amplitudes were larger during upper- and lower-limb tasks and the P300 amplitude and latency were larger and shorter, respectively, during the lower-limb task compared with non-athletes. On the other hand, no significant differences in the P300 amplitude and latency during the upper-limb task were observed between the athlete and non-athlete groups. These results indicate that plastic changes in somatosensory processing might be induced by performing physical exercises that require attention and skilled movements.

Keywords

Event-related potentials Physical exercise Skilled movement Somatosensory stimulation 

References

  1. Allison T, McCarthy G, Wood CC, Williamson PD, Spencer DD (1989) Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. II. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating long-latency activity. J Neurophysiol 62:711–722PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison T, McCarthy G, Wood CC (1992) The relationship between human long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortical surface and from the scalp. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 84:301–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Asanuma H, Pavlides C (1997) Neurobiological basis of motor learning in mammals. Neuroreport 8:i–viGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett G, Neshige R, Shibasaki H (1987) Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 66:409–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Desmedt JE, Robertson D, Brunko E (1977) Somatosensory decision tasks in man: early and late components of the cerebral potentials evoked by stimulation of different finger in random sequences. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 43:404–415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eimer M, Forster B (2003) Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention. Exp Brain Res 151:24–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fontani G, Lodi L (1999) Reactivity and event-related potentials during attentional tests in athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 80:308–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kutas M, McCarthy G, Donchin E (1977) Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 197:792–795PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Michie PT, Bearpark HM, Crawford JM, Glue LC (1987) The effects of spatial selective attention on the somatosensory event-related potential. Psychophysiology 24:449–463PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mori A, Waters RS, Asanuma H (1989) Physiological properties and patterns of projection in the cortico-cortical connections from the second somatosensory cortex to the motor cortex, area 4 gamma, in the cat. Brain Res 504:206–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mesulam MM, Van Hoesen GW, Pandya DN, Geschwind N (1977) Limbic and sensory connections of the inferior parietal lobule (area PG) in the rhesus monkey: a study with a new method for horseradish peroxidase histochemistry. Brain Res 136:393–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pavlides C, Miyashita E, Asanuma H (1993) Projection from the sensory to the motor cortex is important in learning motor skills in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 70:733–741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Polich J, Lardon MT (1997) P300 and long-term physical exercise. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 103:493–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rossi B, Zani A, Taddei F, Pesce C (1992) Chronometric aspects of information processing in high level fencers as compared to nonathletes: an ERPs and RT study. J Hum Mov Stud 23:17–28Google Scholar
  15. Sakamoto T, Arissian K, Asanuma H (1989) Functional role of the sensory cortex in learning motor skills in cats. Brain Res 503:258–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Senturk UK, Aktekin B, Kuru O, Gunduz F, Demir N, Aktekin M R (2000) Effect of long-term swimming exercise on somatosensory evoked potentials in rats. Brain Res 87:199–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomas NG, Mitchell D (1996) Somatosensory-evoked potentials in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28:473–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Valeriani M, Fraiolo L, Ranghi F, Giaquinto S (2001) Dipolar source modeling of the P300 event-related potential after somatosensory stimulation. Muscle Nerve 24:1677–1687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Waters RS, Favorov O, Mori A, Asanuma H (1982) Pattern of projection and physiological properties of cortico-cortical connections from the posterior bank of the ansate sulcus to the motor cortex, area 4 gamma, in the cat. Exp Brain Res 48:335–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wickens C, Kramer A, Vanasse L, Donchin E (1983) The performance of concurrent task :A psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information processing resources. Science 221:1080–1082PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yamaguchi S, Knight RT (1991) Anterior and posterior association cortex contributions to the somatosensory P300. J Neurosci 11:2039–2054PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masako Iwadate
    • 1
  • Akio Mori
    • 1
  • Tomoko Ashizuka
    • 1
  • Masaki Takayose
    • 1
  • Toru Ozawa
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Humanities and SciencesNihon UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations