Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 162, Issue 1, pp 63–69 | Cite as

Behavioral plasticity of antisaccade performance following daily practice

  • Kara A. Dyckman
  • Jennifer E. McDowellEmail author
Research Article


The ability to change behavior to adapt to the environment, known as behavioral plasticity, is an important part of daily life. In the present study subjects’ performances on antisaccade tasks were manipulated by training them on one of three different eye movement tasks (antisaccade, prosaccade, and fixation). Thirty subjects were tested at three time points over a 2-week period and practiced their assigned task every day between test sessions. Subjects who trained on antisaccades significantly decreased their error rates, while maintaining their reaction time, suggesting that accuracy did not improve at the expense of speed. Subjects who practiced the prosaccade task made more errors on the antisaccade task on subsequent test sessions, while those who practiced the fixation task showed no change across test sessions. These results suggest that deliberate practice of eye movement tasks can alter antisaccade performance, and that the direction of the effect is dependent upon the type of practice in which the subject engages.


Antisaccade Prosaccade Fixation Plasticity Practice effects 



This research was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH01852). We thank Jamie Calhoun for her help in data collection and scoring.


  1. Anderson TJ, Jenkins IH, Brooks DJ, Hawken MB, Frackowiak RS, Kennard C (1994) Cortical control of saccades and fixation in man. A PET study. Brain 117:1073–1084PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun D, Breitmeyer BG (1988) Relationship between directed visual attention and saccadic reaction times. Exp Brain Res 73:546–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ettinger U, Kumari V, Crawford TJ, Davis RE, Sharma T, Corr PJ (2003) Reliability of smooth pursuit, fixation, and saccadic eye movements. Psychophysiology 40:620–628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Everling S, Fischer B (1998) The antisaccade: a review of basic research and clinical studies. Neuropsychologia 36:885–899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer B, Hartnegg K (2000) Effects of visual training on saccade control in dyslexia. Perception 29:531–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer B, Ramsperger E (1986) Human express saccades: effects of randomization and daily practice. Exp Brain Res 64:569–578PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fischer B, Weber H, Biscaldi M, Aiple F, Otto P, Stuhr V (1993) Separate populations of visually guided saccades in humans: reaction times and amplitudes. Exp Brain Res 92:528–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer B, Biscaldi M, Gezeck S (1997) On the development of voluntary and reflexive components in human saccade generation. Brain Res 754:285–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer B, Gezeck S, Hartnegg K (2000a) On the production and correction of involuntary prosaccades in a gap antisaccade task. Vision Res 40:2211–2217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer B, Hartnegg K, Mokler A (2000b) Dynamic visual perception of dyslexic children. Perception 29:523–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukushima J, Hatta T, Fukushima K (2000) Development of voluntary control of saccadic eye movements. I. Age-related changes in normal children. Brain Dev 22:173–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Garavan H, Ross TJ, Stein EA (1999) Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:8301–8306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jansma JM, Ramsey NF, Slagter HA, Kahn RS (2001) Functional anatomical correlates of controlled and automatic processing. J Cogn Neurosci 13:730–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG (1995) Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 377:155–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kassubek J, Schmidtke K, Kimmig H, Lucking CH, Greenlee MW (2001) Changes in cortical activation during mirror reading before and after training: an fMRI study of procedural learning. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 10:207–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Klein C, Berg P (2001) Four-week test-retest stability of individual differences in the saccadic CNV, two saccadic task parameters, and selected neuropsychological tests. Psychophysiology 38:704–711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Klein C, Fischer B, Hartnegg K, Heiss WH, Roth M (2000) Optomotor and neuropsychological performance in old age. Exp Brain Res 135:141–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Konishi S, Nakajima K, Uchida I, Kikyo H, Kameyama M, Miyashita Y (1999) Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. Brain 122:981–991CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. McDowell JE, Clementz BA (1997) The effect of fixation condition manipulations on antisaccade performance in schizophrenia: studies of diagnostic specificity. Exp Brain Res 115:333–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McDowell JE, Brown GG, Paulus M, Martinez A, Stewart SE, Dubowitz DJ, Braff DL (2002) Neural correlates of refixation saccades and antisaccades in normal and schizophrenia subjects. Biol Psychiatry 51:216–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mount J (1996) Effect of practice of a throwing skill in one body position on performance of the skill in an alternate position. Percept Mot Skills 83:723–732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Munoz DP, Broughton JR, Goldring JE, Armstrong IT (1998) Age-related performance of human subjects on saccadic eye movement tasks. Exp Brain Res 121:391–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Driscoll GA, Strakowski SM, Alpert NM, Matthysse SW, Rauch SL, Levy DL, Holzman PS (1998) Differences in cerebral activation during smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements using positron-emission tomography. Biol Psychiatry 44:685–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Opris I, Barborica A, Ferrera VP (2001) On the gap effect for saccades evoked by electrical microstimulation of frontal eye fields in monkeys. Exp Brain Res 138:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Rivaud S, Gaymard B, Agid Y (1991) Cortical control of reflexive visually-guided saccades. Brain 114:1473–1485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Ploner CJ, Muri RM, Gaymard B, Rivaud-Pechoux S (2002) Effects of cortical lesions on saccadic: eye movements in humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci 956:216–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Muri RM, Ploner CJ, Gaymard B, Demeret S, Rivaud-Pechoux S (2003) Decisional role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in ocular motor behaviour. Brain 126:1460–1473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Poldrack RA, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JD (1998) The neural basis of visual skill learning: an fMRI study of mirror reading. Cereb Cortex 8:1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Roberts R, Hager, LS, & Heron, C (1994) Prefrontal cognitive processes: working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. J Exp Psychol Gen 123:374–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roy-Byrne P, Radant A, Wingerson D, Cowley DS (1995) Human oculomotor function: reliability and diurnal variation. Biol Psychiatry 38:92–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Smyrnis N, Evdokimidis I, Stefanis NC, Constantinidis TS, Avramopoulos D, Theleritis C, Paximadis C, Efstratiadis C, Kastrinakis G, Stefanis CN (2002) The antisaccade task in a sample of 2:006 young males. II. Effects of task parameters. Exp Brain Res 147:53–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wenban-Smith MG, Findlay JM (1991) Express saccades: is there a separate population in humans? Exp Brain Res 87:218–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations