Distinct changes in cortical and spinal excitability following high-frequency repetitive TMS to the human motor cortex
- 507 Downloads
It has been shown that high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the human primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) can induce a lasting increase in corticospinal excitability. Here we recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the right first dorsal interosseus muscle to investigate how sub-threshold high-frequency rTMS to the M1-HAND modulates cortical and spinal excitability. In a first experiment, we gave 1500 stimuli of 5 Hz rTMS. At an intensity of 90% of active motor threshold, rTMS produced no effect on MEP amplitude at rest. Increasing the intensity to 90% of resting motor threshold (RMT), rTMS produced an increase in MEP amplitude. This facilitatory effect gradually built up during the course of rTMS, reaching significance after the administration of 900 stimuli. In a second experiment, MEPs were elicited during tonic contraction using weak anodal electrical or magnetic test stimuli. 1500 (but not 600) conditioning stimuli at 90% of RMT induced a facilitation of MEPs in the contracting FDI muscle. In a third experiment, 600 conditioning stimuli were given at 90% of RMT to the M1-HAND. Using two well-established conditioning-test paradigms, we found a decrease in short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI), and a facilitation of the first peak of facilitatory I-waves interaction (SICF). There was no correlation between the relative changes in SICI and SICF. These results demonstrate that subthreshold 5 Hz rTMS can induce lasting changes in specific neuronal subpopulations in the human corticospinal motor system, depending on the intensity and duration of rTMS. Short 5 Hz rTMS (600 stimuli) at 90% of RMT can selectively shape the excitability of distinct intracortical circuits, whereas prolonged 5 Hz rTMS (≥900 stimuli) provokes an overall increase in excitability of the corticospinal output system, including spinal motoneurones.
KeywordsCorticospinal excitability Human motor cortex Paired pulse TMS Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation Transcranial electrical stimulation
H.R. Siebner was supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (grant 01GO0206) and the Volkswagen Foundation (grant I/79 932).
- Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Profice P, Insola A, Mazzone P, Tonali P, Rothwell JC (1999) Direct recordings of descending volleys after transcranial magnetic and electric motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans. Electroen Clin Neuro Suppl 51:120–126Google Scholar
- Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A, Caramia MD, Caruso G, Cracco RQ, Dimitrijevic MR, Hallett M, Katayama Y, Lucking CH (1994) Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroen Clin Neuro 91:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rothwell JC (1999) Paired-pulse investigations of short-latency intracortical facilitation using TMS in humans. Electroen Clin Neuro Suppl 51:113–119Google Scholar
- Rounis E, Siebner HR, et al (2003) The effect of 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left primary motor hand area on regional blood flow and motor cortex excitability. NeuroImage 19:17822 (available on CD-Rom in Issue 2, Suppl 1)Google Scholar
- Siebner HR, Rothwell J (2003) Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity. Exp Brain Res 148:1–16Google Scholar
- Wassermann EM (1998) Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5–7, 1996. Electroen Clin Neuro 108:1–16Google Scholar
- Ziemann U (1999) Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in the conventional paired TMS paradigm. Electroen Clin Neuro Suppl 51:127–136Google Scholar