Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study
- 1.4k Downloads
Previously, professional violin players were found to automatically discriminate tiny pitch changes, not discriminable by nonmusicians. The present study addressed the pitch processing accuracy in musicians with expertise in playing a wide selection of instruments (e.g., piano; wind and string instruments). Of specific interest was whether also musicians with such divergent backgrounds have facilitated accuracy in automatic and/or attentive levels of auditory processing. Thirteen professional musicians and 13 nonmusicians were presented with frequent standard sounds and rare deviant sounds (0.8, 2, or 4% higher in frequency). Auditory event-related potentials evoked by these sounds were recorded while first the subjects read a self-chosen book and second they indicated behaviorally the detection of sounds with deviant frequency. Musicians detected the pitch changes faster and more accurately than nonmusicians. The N2b and P3 responses recorded during attentive listening had larger amplitude in musicians than in nonmusicians. Interestingly, the superiority in pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians over nonmusicians was observed not only with the 0.8% but also with the 2% frequency changes. Moreover, also nonmusicians detected quite reliably the smallest pitch changes of 0.8%. However, the mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a recorded during a reading condition did not differentiate musicians and nonmusicians. These results suggest that musical expertise may exert its effects merely at attentive levels of processing and not necessarily already at the preattentive levels.
KeywordsPitch discrimination Complex sounds Musical expertise Auditory event-related potentials Mismatch negativity (MMN) P3a N2b P3
The study was supported by Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Marie Curie Individual fellowship by European Commission (M.T.; QLK6-CT-2000051227) and DFG (E.S.).
- Berti S, Schröger E (2001) Involuntary attention switch with different levels of distractor strenght. In: Sommerfeld E, Kompass R, Lachmann T (eds) Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. Pabst Science, Lengerich, Germany, pp 285–290Google Scholar
- Fastl H, Hesse A (1984) Frequency discrimination for pure tones at short durations. Acustica 56:41–47Google Scholar
- Kaernbach C (1991) Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Percept Psychophysiol 49:227–229Google Scholar
- Münte TF, Altenmüller E, Jäncke L (2002) The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity. Nature Neurosci Rev 3:473–478Google Scholar
- Näätänen R (1992) Attention and brain function. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
- Näätänen R, Winkler I (1999) The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull 6:826–859Google Scholar
- Schröger E (1998) Measurement and interpretation of the Mismatch Negativity (MMN). Behav Res Methods, Instrum Comput 30:131–145Google Scholar
- Trainor LJ, Desjardings RN, Rockel C (1999) A comparison of contour and interval processing in musicians and nonmusicians using event-related potentials. Aust J Psychol 51:147–153Google Scholar