Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 158, Issue 3, pp 385–390 | Cite as

Bilateral responses of upper limb muscles to transcranial magnetic stimulation in human subjects

Research Note

Abstract.

Anatomical and behavioural work on primates has shown bilateral innervation of axial and proximal limb muscles, and contralateral control of distal limb muscles. The following study examined if a clear boundary exists between the distal and proximal upper limb muscles that are controlled contralaterally or bilaterally. The right motor cortical area representing the upper limb was stimulated, while surface EMG was recorded bilaterally from various upper limb muscles during rest and phasic voluntary contractions. Peak-to-peak amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP) was measured for each muscle on both sides. The ratio R = (ipsilateral MEP: contralateral MEP) was calculated for seven pairs of muscles. For each of the seven pairs, R was less than 1.0, implying that for each muscle and subject, the contralateral control is stronger. The boundary where R changed from almost zero to a clearly measurable magnitude depended on the subject. Ipsilateral MEPs from trapezius and pectoralis could be recorded with a small background contraction from almost all subjects; on the other hand, in deltoid and biceps brachii, ipsilateral MEPs were observed only with bimanual phasic contractions. The forearm and hand muscles, in general, did not show any ipsilateral MEPs. Major differences between subjects lay in the presence or the absence of ipsilateral MEPs in biceps brachii and deltoid, without defining a sharp boundary between proximal and distal muscles.

Keywords

Motor evoked potentials Transcranial magnetic stimulation Bilateral responses Ipsilateral responses Phasic movements 

References

  1. Alagona G, Delvaux V, Gérard P, De Pasqua V, Pennisi G, Delwaide PJ, Nicoletti F, Maertens de Noordhout A (2001) Ipsilateral motor responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects and acute-stroke patients. Stroke 32:1304–1309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brinkman J, Kuypers HGJM (1973) Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the split-brain rhesus monkey. Brain 96:653–674PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardoso de Oliveira S, Gribova A, Donchin O, Bergman H, Vaadia E (2001) Neural interactions between motor cortical hemispheres during bimanual and unimanual arm movements. Eur J Neurosci 14:1881–1896CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Carr LJ, Harrison LM, Stephens JA (1994) Evidence for the bilateral innervation of certain homologous motoneurone pools in man. J Physiol 475:217–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Diedrichsen J, Hazeltine E, Nurss EK, Ivry RB (2003) The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses. J Neurophysiol 90:2409–2418PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Donchin O, Cardosa de Oliveira S, Vaadia E (1999) Who tells one hand what the other is doing: The neurophysiology of bimanual movements. Neuron 23:15–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferbert A, Priori A, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Colebatch JG, Marsden CD (1992) Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 453:525–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher CM (1992) Concerning the mechanism of recovery in stroke hemiplegia. Can J Neurol Sci 19:57–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobson LS, Servos P, Goodale MA, Lassonde M (1994) Control of proximal and distal components of prehension in callosal agenesis. Brain 117:1107–1113Google Scholar
  10. Kazennikov O, Wicki U, Corboz M, Hyland B, Palmeri A, Rouiller EM, Wiesendanger M (1994) Temporal structure of a bimanual goal-directed movement sequence in monkeys. Eur J Neurosci 6:203–210Google Scholar
  11. Keel JC, Smith MJ, Wassermann EM (2001) A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 112:720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Khedr EM, Trakhan MN (2001) Localization of diaphragm motor cortical representation and determination of corticodiaphragmatic latencies by using magnetic stimulation in normal adult human subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 85:560–566PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuypers HGJM (1985) The anatomical and functional organization of the motor system. In: Swash M, Kennard C (eds) Scientific basis of clinical neurology. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  14. Maertens de Noordhout A, Rapisarda G, Bogacz D, Gerard P, De Pasqua V, Pennisi G, Delwaide PJ (1999) Corticomotoneuronal synaptic connections in normal man: an electrophysiological study. Brain 122:1327–1340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Marsden JF, Farmer SF, Halliday DM, Rosenberg JR, Brown P (1999) The unilateral and bilateral control of motor unit pairs in the first dorsal interosseous and paraspinal muscles in man. J Physiol 521:553–564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Muellbacher W, Artner C, Mamoli B (1999) The role of the intact hemisphere in recovery of midline muscles after recent monohemispheric stroke. J Neurol 246:250–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Müller K, Kass-Iliyya F, Reitz M (1997) Ontogeny of ipsilateral corticospinal projections: A developmental study with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Ann Neurol 42:705–711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Palmer E, Ashby P (1992) Corticospinal projections to upper limb motoneurones in humans. J Physiol 448:397–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rokini U, Steinberg O, Vaadia E, Sompolinsky H (2003) Cortical representation of bimanual movements. J Neurosci 23:11577–11586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sanes JN, Donoghue JP (2000) Plasticity and primary motor cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 23:393–415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Serrien DJ, Brown P (2002) The functional role of interhemispheric synchronization in the control of bimanual timing tasks. Exp Brain Res 147:268–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sohn YH, Jung HY, Kaelin-Lang A, Hallett M (2003) Excitability of the ipsilateral motor cortex during phasic voluntary hand movement. Exp Brain Res 148:176–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Staudt M, Grodd W, Gerloff C, Erb M, Stitz J, Krägeloh-Mann I (2002) Two types of ipsilateral reorganization in congenital hemiparesis. A TMS and fMRI study. Brain 125:2222–2237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tanji J, Okano K, Sato KC (1988) Neuronal activity in cortical motor areas related to ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral digit movements of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 60:325–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Turton A, Wroe S, Trepte N, Fraser C, Lemon RN (1996) Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 101:316–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wasserman EM, Fuhr P, Cohen LG, Hallett M (1991) Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on ipsilateral muscles. Neurology 41:1795–1799PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wasserman EM, Pascual-Leone A, Hallett M (1994) Cortical motor representation of the ipsilateral hand and arm. Exp Brain Res 100:121–132Google Scholar
  28. Wiesendanger M, Rouiller EM, Kazennikov O, Perrig S (1996) Is the supplementary motor area a bilaterally organized system? Adv Neurol 70:85–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ziemann, Ishii K, Borgheresi A, Yaseen Z, Battaglia F, Hallett M, Cincotta M, Wasserman EM (1999) Dissociation of the pathways mediating ipsilateral and contralateral motor-evoked potentials in human hand and arm muscles. J Physiol 518:895–906PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Bawa
    • 1
  • J. D. Hamm
    • 1
  • P. Dhillon
    • 1
  • P. A. Gross
    • 1
  1. 1.School of KinesiologySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations