Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?
Quick voluntary responses to environmental stimuli are required of people on a daily basis. These movements have long been thought to be controlled via cortical loops involving processing of the stimulus and generation of a suitable response. Recent experiments have shown that in simple reaction time (RT) tasks, the appropriate response can be elicited much earlier (facilitated) when the “go” signal is replaced by a startling (124 dB) auditory stimulus. In the present experiment we combined a startling acoustic stimulus with an established RT paradigm that involved simple and choice RT. In a simple RT condition the prepared voluntary response was elicited at very short latencies following the startle. However, when cortical processing was required prior to responding (choice RT task), the startle did not facilitate the voluntary response, and gave rise to more movement production errors. Since movements requiring ongoing cortical processing following the stimulus are not facilitated by startle, it is unlikely that the startle facilitation is due to increased neural activation. In contrast, it appears more likely that the startle acts as an early trigger for subcortically stored prepared movements since movements that are prepared in advance can be initiated at such short latencies (<60 ms).
KeywordsElectromyography Information processing Motor control Reaction time Startle
This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) awarded to I.M.F.
- Brebner JMT, Welford AT (1980) Introduction: an historical background sketch. In: Welford AT (ed) Reaction times. Academic Press, London, pp 1–23Google Scholar
- Donders FC (1868/1969) On the speed of mental processes Acta Psycholog 30:412–431Google Scholar
- Hick WE (1952) On the rate of gain of information. Q J Exp Psychol 4:11–26Google Scholar
- Howell DC (1997) Statistical methods for psychology, 4th edn. Duxbury, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
- Klapp ST (1996) Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In: Zelaznik HN (ed) Advances in motor learning and control. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 13–35Google Scholar
- Martin JH, Jessel TM (1991) Modality coding in the somatic sensory system. In: ER Kandel, JH Schwartz, TM Jessel (eds) Principles of neural science, 3rd edn. Elsevier, New York, pp 341–352Google Scholar
- Vlasak M (1969) Effect of startle stimuli on performance. Aerospace Med 40:124–128Google Scholar
- Wadman WJ, Denier van der Gon JJ, Geuze RH, Mol CR (1979) Control of fast goal-directed arm movements. J Hum Mov Stud 5:3–17Google Scholar
- Woodhead MM (1959) Effect of brief loud noise on decision making. J Acou Soc Am 31:1329–1331Google Scholar
- Woodhead MM (1963) The effect of bursts of noise on an arithmetic task. Hum Factors 5:627–633Google Scholar
- Woodworth RS (1938) Experimental psychology. Henry Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar