Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 156, Issue 4, pp 524–528 | Cite as

The role of shortening reaction in mediating rigidity in Parkinson’s disease

Research Note

Abstract

Rigidity in Parkinson’s disease (PD) is defined as an increased resistance to passive movement of a joint. The plastic-type rigidity is uniform and constant throughout the entire range of motion, whereas the cogwheel-type rigidity is accompanied by tremor. Rigidity in PD has been understudied. Thus, its pathophysiological basis remains unclear. The purpose of the study is to examine neuromuscular/biomechanical properties of PD rigidity and to provide its physiological characteristics. We hypothesize that PD rigidity presents as a flattened trace of joint torque vs. angular position (torque-angle relation) of the wrist, because the forces generated by lengthening muscles are offset by activation of the antagonist, i.e. “shortening reaction” (SR). Experiments were conducted on six PD subjects medication OFF and ON. PD severity was assessed based on the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale. Each subject sat on a chair and was instructed to relax, with the wrist coupled to the device. The servomotor applied constant velocity displacement to create wrist flexion/extension. Electromyographic (EMG) responses were monitored from wrist muscles, along with position, velocity and torque. EMG magnitudes were computed over the movement period. Slopes were derived from the torque-angle trace. Results showed that SRs were routinely recorded OFF medication, but substantially reduced ON medication. Due to the interaction of SR, torque-angle relation was flatter OFF medication and became steeper ON medication. Correlation analyses showed that a strong correlation (R=0.65) existed between SR and torque-angle slope OFF medication, exclusively. We suggest that SR may play an important role in mediating the mechanical features of PD rigidity.

Keywords

Anti-Parkinsonian medicine Parkinson’s disease Rigidity Shortening reaction Torque-angle relation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by NIH. The authors would like to thank Tanya Simuni, MD, for selecting and referring PD patients for the study.

References

  1. Andrews CJ, Burke D (1973) Quantitative study of the effect of L-dopa and phenoxybenzamine on the rigidity of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 36:321–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews CJ, Burke D, Lance JW (1972) The response to muscle stretch and shortening in Parkinsonian rigidity. Brain 95:795–812PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews CJ, Neilson PD, Lance JW (1973) Comparison of stretch reflexes and shortening reactions in activated normal subjects with those in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 36:329–333Google Scholar
  4. Berardelli A, Hallett M (1984) Shortening reaction of human tibialis anterior. Neurology 34:242–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berardelli A, Sabra AF, Hallett M (1983) Physiological mechanisms of rigidity in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46:45–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cody FWJ, MacDermott N, Matthews PBC, Richardson HC (1986) Observations on the genesis of the stretch reflex in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 109:229–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Katz R, Rondot P (1978) Muscle reaction to passive shortening in normal man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45:90–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Matthews PBC, Cody FWJ, Richardson HC, MacDermott N (1990) Observations on the reflex effects seen in Parkinson’s disease on terminating a period of tendon vibration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 53:215–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Meara RJ, Cody FWJ (1993) Stretch reflexes of individual Parkinsonian patients studied during changes in clinical rigidity following medication. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 89:261–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mortimer JA, Webster DD (1979) Evidence for a quantitative association between EMG stretch responses and Parkinsonian rigidity. Brain Res 162:169–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Perneger TV (1998) What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. Br Med J 316:1236–1238Google Scholar
  12. Perotto AO (1994) Anatomical guide for the electromyographer: the limbs and trunk. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Il, USA, pp 141–171Google Scholar
  13. Rondot P, Metral S (1973) Analysis of the shortening reaction in man. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology, vol. 3. Karger, Basel, pp 629–634Google Scholar
  14. Rothwell JC, Obeso JA, Traub MM, Marsden CD (1983) The behaviour of the long-latency stretch reflex in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46:35–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sherrington CS (1909) On plastic tonus and proprioceptive reflexes. Quart J Exp Physiol 2:109–156Google Scholar
  16. Tatton WG, Bedingham W, Verrier MC, Blair RD (1984) Characteristic alterations in responses to imposed wrist displacements in Parkinsonian rigidity and dystonia musculorum deformans. Can J Neurol Sci 11:281–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Westphal C (1877) Unterschenkelphänomen und Nervendehnung. Arch Psychiat und Nervenkr 7:666–670Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Physical TherapyUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationNorthwestern UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Sensory Motor Performance ProgramRehabilitation Institute of ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations