Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 157, Issue 4, pp 431–441 | Cite as

Learning impaired children exhibit timing deficits and training-related improvements in auditory cortical responses to speech in noise

  • Catherine M. Warrier
  • Krista L. Johnson
  • Erin A. Hayes
  • Trent Nicol
  • Nina Kraus
Research Article

Abstract

The physiological mechanisms that contribute to abnormal encoding of speech in children with learning problems are yet to be well understood. Furthermore, speech perception problems appear to be particularly exacerbated by background noise in this population. This study compared speech-evoked cortical responses recorded in a noisy background to those recorded in quiet in normal children (NL) and children with learning problems (LP). Timing differences between responses recorded in quiet and in background noise were assessed by cross-correlating the responses with each other. Overall response magnitude was measured with root-mean-square (RMS) amplitude. Cross-correlation scores indicated that 23% of LP children exhibited cortical neural timing abnormalities such that their neurophysiological representation of speech sounds became distorted in the presence of background noise. The latency of the N2 response in noise was isolated as being the root of this distortion. RMS amplitudes in these children did not differ from NL children, indicating that this result was not due to a difference in response magnitude. LP children who participated in a commercial auditory training program and exhibited improved cortical timing also showed improvements in phonological perception. Consequently, auditory pathway timing deficits can be objectively observed in LP children, and auditory training can diminish these deficits.

Keywords

Auditory evoked potentials Cross-correlation Learning disorders Neural timing Speech perception Auditory training 

References

  1. Alain C, Woods D, Knight R (1998) A distributed cortical network for auditory sensory memory in humans. Brain Res 812:23–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atienza M, Cantero JL, Dominguez-Marin E (2002) The time course of neural changes underlying auditory perceptual learning. Learn Mem 9:138–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellis TJ (1996) Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting: from science to practice. Singular Publishing, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosnyak DJ, Eaton RA, Roberts LE (2002) Enhancement of multiple components of the auditory evoked potential in nonmusicians by training for pitch discrimination with 40-Hz amplitude modulated tones. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Biomagnetism, Jena, Germany, AugustGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradlow AR, Kraus N, Nicol TG, McGee TJ, Cunningham J, Zecker SG, Carrell TD (1999) Effects of lengthened formant transition duration on discrimination and neural representation of synthetic CV syllables by normal and learning-disabled children. J Acoust Soc Am 106:2086–2096CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradlow AR, Kraus N, Hayes E (2003) Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res 46:80–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrell TD, Bradlow AR, Nicol TG, Koch DB, Kraus N (1999) Interactive software for evaluating auditory discrimination. Ear Hearing 20:175–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Čeponienė R, Rinne T, Näätänen R (2002) Maturation of cortical sound processing as indexed by event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 113:870–882CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chermak GD, Musiek FE (1997) Central auditory processing disorders: new perspectives. Singular Publishing, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham J, Nicol T, Zecker S, Kraus N (2000) Speech-evoked neurophysiologic responses in children with learning problems: development and behavioral correlates of perception. Ear Hearing 21:554–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunningham J, Nicol T, Zecker SG, Kraus N (2001) Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement. Clin Neurophysiol 112:758–767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Diehl S (1999) Listen & Learn? A software review of Earobics, language, speech and hearing services in schools. ASHA 30:108–116Google Scholar
  13. Edeline JM (2003) The thalamo-cortical auditory receptive fields: regulation by the states of vigilance, learning and the neuromodulatory systems. Exp Brain Res 153:554–572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliott LL (1979) Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am 66:651–653PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott LL, Hammer MA, Scholl ME (1989) Fine-grained auditory discrimination in normal children and children with language-learning problems. J Speech Hear Res 32:112–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayes E, Warrier CM, Nicol T, Zecker SG, Kraus N (2003) Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems. Clin Neurophysiol 114:673–684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ, Anderson JW (2001) Topographic distribution and developmental timecourse of auditory event-related potentials in two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Int J Psychophysiol 42:73–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Josey A (1985) Auditory brainstem response in site of lesion testing. In: Katz J (ed) Handbook of clinical audiology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, pp 534–548Google Scholar
  19. Kilgard MP, Merzenich MM (1998) Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity. Science 279:1714–1718PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kilgard MP, Merzenich MM (2002) Order-sensitive plasticity in adult primary auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3205–3209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. King C, Warrier CM, Hayes E, Kraus N (2002) Deficits in auditory brainstem pathway encoding of speech sounds in children with learning problems. Neurosci Lett 319:111–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Klatt DH (1980) Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. J Acoust Soc Am 67:971–995Google Scholar
  23. Kraus N, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Zecker SG, Nicol TG, Koch DB (1996) Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems. Science 273:971–973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Liasis A, Bamiou DE, Campbell P, Sirimanna T, Boyd S, Towell A (2003) Auditory event-related potentials in the assessment of auditory processing disorders: a pilot study. Neuropediatrics 34:23–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Maiste AC, Wiens AS, Hunt MJ, Scherg M, Picton TW (1995) Event-related potentials and the categorical perception of speech sounds. Ear Hearing 16:68–90Google Scholar
  26. Martin BA, Sigal A, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR (1997) The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. J Acoust Soc Am 101:1585–1599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin BA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR (1999) The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the mismatch negativity to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42:271–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Menning H, Roberts LE, Pantev C (2000) Plastic changes in the auditory cortex induced by intensive frequency discrimination training. Neuroreport 11:817–822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Morrison S (1998) Computer applications. Earobics Pro Child Lang Teaching Ther 14:279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Musiek FE (1991) Auditory evoked responses in site-of-lesion assessment. In: Rintelmann WF (ed) Hearing assessment. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX, pp 383–427Google Scholar
  31. Näätänen R, Picton TW (1986) N2 and automatic versus controlled processes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 38:169–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Näätänen R, Picton T (1987) The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24:375–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Näätänen R, Simpson M, Loveless NE (1982) Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Biol Psychol 14:53–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nabelek AK, Pickett JM (1974) Reception of consonants in a classroom as affected by monaural and binaural listening, noise, reverberation, and hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 56:628–639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Oates PA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR (2002) Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear 23:399–415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Phillips DP (1993) Representation of acoustic events in the primary auditory cortex. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:203–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ponton CW, Vasama JP, Tremblay K, Khosla D, Kwong B, Don M (2001) Plasticity in the adult human central auditory system: evidence from late-onset profound unilateral deafness. Hear Res 154:32–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Russo NM, Nicol T, Hayes E, Zecker S, Kraus N (2003) Auditory training can improve neural timing in the auditory brainstem. Program No. 400.33. 2003 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC, 2003. OnlineGoogle Scholar
  39. Scherg M, Von Cramon D (1985) Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 62:32–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Shahin A, Bosnyak DJ, Trainor LJ, Roberts LE (2003) Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians. J Neurosci 23:5545–5552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Shtyrov Y, Kujala T, Lyytinen H, Ilmoniemi RJ, Näätänen R (2000) Auditory cortex evoked magnetic fields and lateralization of speech processing. Neuroreport 11:2893–2896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Stark RE, Heinz JM (1996) Vowel perception in children with and without language impairment. J Speech Hear Res 39:860–869PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tallal P (1980) Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain Lang 9:182–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Tallal P, Piercy M (1974) Developmental aphasia: rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception. Neuropsychologia 12:83–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Taylor MM, Creelman CD (1967) PEST: efficient estimates on probability functions. J Acoust Soc Am 41:782–787Google Scholar
  46. Tonnquist-Uhlen I (1996a) Topography of auditory evoked cortical potentials in children with severe language impairment. Scand Audiol Suppl 44:1–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tonnquist-Uhlen I (1996b) Topography of auditory evoked long-latency potentials in children with severe language impairment: the P2 and N2 components. Ear Hearing 17:314–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tremblay KL, Kraus N (2002) Auditory training induces asymmetrical changes in cortical neural activity. J Speech Lang Hear Res 45:564–572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T, Ponton C, Otis B (2001) Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear Hear 22:79–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Whiting KA, Martin BA, Stapells DR (1998) The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. Ear Hear 19:218–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wible B, Nicol T, Kraus N (2002) Abnormal neural encoding of repeated speech stimuli in noise in children with learning problems. Clin Neurophysiol 113:485–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilkinson G (1993) Wide range achievement test-3. Jastak Assoc., Wilmington, DEGoogle Scholar
  53. Woodcock R, Johnson M (1977) Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Tests of cognitive ability. DLM Teaching Resources, Allen, TXGoogle Scholar
  54. Woodcock R, Johnson M (1989) Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Tests of cognitive ability. DLM Teaching Resources, Allen, TXGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine M. Warrier
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Krista L. Johnson
    • 1
    • 3
  • Erin A. Hayes
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Trent Nicol
    • 1
    • 3
  • Nina Kraus
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Auditory Neuroscience LaboratoryNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Institute for NeuroscienceNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Communication SciencesNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Neurobiology and PhysiologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  5. 5.Department of OtolaryngologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations