Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 157, Issue 3, pp 359–368 | Cite as

“Proprioceptive signature” of cursive writing in humans: a multi-population coding

  • Jean-Pierre Roll
  • Frédéric Albert
  • Edith Ribot-Ciscar
  • Mikael Bergenheim
Research Article

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to investigate the firing behavior of populations of muscle spindle afferents in all the muscles acting on the ankle while this joint was being subjected to “writing-like” movements. First it was proposed to determine whether the ensemble of muscle spindles give rise to a unique, specific, and reproducible feedback information characterizing each letter, number or short word. Secondly, we analyzed how the proprioceptive feedback on the whole encodes the spatial and temporal characteristics of writing movements using the “vector population model”. The unitary activity of 51 primary and secondary muscle spindle afferents was recorded in the tibial and common peroneal nerves at the level of the popliteal fossea, using the microneurographic method. The units recorded from belonged to the tibialis anterior, the extensor digitorum longus, the extensor hallucis longus, the peroneus lateralis, the gastrocnemius-soleus and the tibialis posterior muscles. The “writing-like” movements were randomly imposed at a “natural” velocity via a computer-controlled machine in a two-dimensional space. In general, muscle spindle afferents from any of the six muscles responded according to the tuning properties of the parent muscle, i.e. increasing their discharge rate during the phases where the direction of movement was within the preferred sensory sector of the parent muscle. The whole trajectory of the writing movements was coded in turn by the activity of Ia afferents arising from all the muscles acting on the joint. Both single afferent responses and population responses were found to be highly specific and reproducible with each graphic sign. The complex multi-muscle afferent pattern involved, with its timing and distribution in the muscle space, seems to constitute a true “proprioceptive signature” for each graphic symbol. The ensemble of muscle spindle afferents were therefore found to encode the instantaneous direction and velocity of writing movements remarkably accurately. It was concluded that the proprioceptive feedback from all the muscles with which the moving joint is equipped provides the CNS with highly specific information that might contribute to a graphic sign identification process.

Keywords

Muscle spindle afferents Microneurography Ensemble coding “Vector population model” Writing movements 

References

  1. Ans B, Gilhodes JC, Hérault J (1983) Simulation de réseaux neuronaux (sirene). II. Hypothèse de décodage du message de mouvement porté par les afférences fusoriales IA et II par un mécanisme de plasticité synaptique. C R Acad Sci Paris, 297 série III, pp 419–422Google Scholar
  2. Bergenheim M, Roll JP, Ribot-Ciscar E (1999) Microneurography in humans. In: Windhorst U, Johansson H (eds) Modern techniques in neurosciences research. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 801–819Google Scholar
  3. Bergenheim M, Ribot-Ciscar E, Roll JP (2000) Proprioceptive population coding of 2-D movements in humans. I. Muscle spindle feedback during “spatially oriented movements.” Exp Brain Res 134:301–310Google Scholar
  4. Birznieks I, Jenmalm P, Goodwin AW, Johansson RS (2001) Directional encoding of fingertip force by human tactile afferents. J Neurosci 21:8222–8237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Coiton Y, Gilhodes JC, Velay JL, Roll JP (1991) A neural network model for the intersensory coordination involved in goal-directed movements. Biol Cybern 66:167–176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cole J (1995) Pride and daily marathon. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Cordo PJ (1990) Kinesthetic control of a multijoint movement sequence. J Neurophysiol 63:161–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Edin BB, Johansson N (1995) Skin strain patterns provide kinaesthetic information to the human central nervous system. J Physiol 487:243–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Forget R (1986) Perte des afférences sensorielles et fonction motrice chez l’homme. Doctoral Thesis, Université de MontréalGoogle Scholar
  10. Gandevia SC (1996) Kinesthesia: roles for afferent signals and motor commands. In : Rowel LB, Sheperd JT (eds) Handbook of physiology, sect 12: Exercise: regulation and integration of multiple system. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 128–172Google Scholar
  11. Gandevia SC, Burke D (1992) Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movement ? Behav Brain Sci 15:614–632Google Scholar
  12. Ghez C, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Christakos CN, Cooper SE (1990) Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 55:837–847PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilhodes JC, Roll JP (2001) Virtual hand-writing induced by well-patterned tendon vibration in humans. Behav Pharmacol 12(Suppl 1):S41Google Scholar
  14. Gilhodes JC, Roll JP, Tardy-Gervet MF (1986) Perceptual and motor effects of agonist-antagonist muscle vibration in Man. Exp Brain Res 61:395–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilhodes JC, Coiton Y, Roll JP, Ans B (1993) Propriomuscular coding of kinaesthesic sensation. Biol Cybern 68:509–517PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gordon J, Iyer M, Ghez C (1987) Impairment of motor programming and trajectory control in a deafferented patient. Soc Neurosci Abstr 13:352Google Scholar
  17. Jones KE, Wessberg J, Vallbo AB (2001) Directional tuning of human forearm muscle afferents during voluntary wrist movements. J Physiol 536:635–647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kavounoudias A, Roll R, Roll JP (2001) Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contribute jointly to human erect posture regulation. J Physiol 532:869–878PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Laszlo JI, Bairstow PJ (1971) Accuracy of movement, peripheral feedback and efference copy. J Motor Behav 3:241–252Google Scholar
  20. Paillard J (1991) Les bases nerveuses du contrôle visuo-manuel de l’écriture. In: Sirat C, Irigoin J, Poulle E (eds) L’écriture: le cerveau, l’oeil et la main. Brepols, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. Radovanovic S, Jaric S, Milanovic S, Ljubisavljevic M, Vukcevic I, Anastasijevic R (1998) The effects of prior antagonist muscle vibration on performance of rapid movements. J EMG Kinesiol 8:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Redon C, Hay L, Rigal R, Roll JP (1994) Contribution of the propriomuscular channel to movement coding in children: a study involving the use of vibration-induced kinaesthetic illusion. Hum Mov Sci 13:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ribot-Ciscar E, Bergenheim M, Roll JP (2002) The preferred sensory direction of muscle spindle primary endings influences the velocity coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans. Exp Brain Res 145:429–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ribot-Ciscar E, Bergenheim M, Roll JP (2003) Proprioceptive population coding of limb position in humans. Exp Brain Res 149:512–519PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Roll JP (2003) Physiology of kinesthesia. Muscular proprioception: sixth sense or primary sense? Intellectica, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  26. Roll JP, Gilhodes JC (1995) Proprioceptive sensory codes mediating movement trajectory perception: human hand vibration-induced drawing illusions. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73:295–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Roll JP, Gilhodes JC, Roll R, Harlay F (1996) Are proprioceptive sensory inputs combined into a “Gestalt”? Vibration-induced virtual hand drawing or visual target motion. Attent Perform 12:291–314Google Scholar
  28. Roll JP, Bergenheim M, Ribot-Ciscar E (2000) Proprioceptive population coding of 2-D limb movements in humans. II. Muscle spindle feedback during “drawing like movements”. Exp Brain Res 134:311–321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sacks O (1985) The man who mistook his wife for a hat and other clinical tales. Simon & Schuster (ed). Summit Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwartz AB (1992) Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: single-unit activity during sinusoid tracing. J Neurophysiol 68:528–541PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwartz AB (1993) Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: population representation during sinusoid tracing. J Neurophysiol 70:28–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwartz AB, Moran DW (2000) Arm trajectory and representation of movement processing in motor cortical activity. Eur J Neurosci 12:1851–1856CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Teasdale N, Forget R, Bard C, Paillard J, Fleury M, Lamarre Y (1993) The role of proprioceptive information for the production of isometric forces and for handwriting tasks. Acta Psychol 82:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vallbo AB, Hagbarth KE (1968) Activity from skin mechanoreceptors recorded percutaneously in awake human subjects. Exp Neurol 21:270–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Verschueren SM, Cordo PJ, Swinnen SP (1998) Representation of wrist joint kinematics by the ensemble of muscle spindles from synergistic muscles. J Neurophysiol 79:2265–2276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Verschueren SM, Swinnen SP, Cordo PJ, Dounskaia NV (1999a) Proprioceptive control of multijoint movement: unimanual circle drawing. Exp Brain Res 127:171–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Verschueren SM, Swinnen SP, Cordo PJ, Dounskaia NV (1999b) Proprioceptive control of multijoint movement: bimanual circle drawing. Exp Brain Res 127:182–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Viviani P (1990) Common factors in the control of free and constrained movements. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance XIII: motor representation and control. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 345–374Google Scholar
  39. Viviani P (1998) Pleins et déliés. Sciences et Vie. Le Cerveau et le mouvement, pp 36–47Google Scholar
  40. Viviani P, Terzuolo CA (1983) The organization of movement in handwriting and typing. In: Butterworth B (ed) Language production, vol II. Development, writing and other language processes. Academic Press, New York pp 103–146Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Pierre Roll
    • 1
    • 3
  • Frédéric Albert
    • 1
  • Edith Ribot-Ciscar
    • 1
  • Mikael Bergenheim
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Neurobiologie HumaineUMR 6149 Université de Provence/CNRSMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.Center for Muskculoskeletal ResearchUniversity of GävleUmeaSweden
  3. 3.Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Humaine, UMR 6149Université de Provence/CNRSMarseille Cedex 20France

Personalised recommendations