Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 156, Issue 2, pp 149–163 | Cite as

Cerebellar damage produces context-dependent deficits in control of leg dynamics during obstacle avoidance

  • Susanne M. Morton
  • Goran S. Dordevic
  • Amy J. BastianEmail author
Research Article


It has been suggested that the cerebellum is an important contributor to CNS prediction and control of intersegmental dynamics during voluntary multijoint reaching movements. Leg movements subserve different behavioral goals, e.g., locomotion versus voluntary stepping, which may or may not be under similar dynamic control. The objective was to determine whether cerebellar leg hypermetria (excessive foot elevation) during obstacle avoidance in locomotion and voluntary stepping could be attributed to a particular deficit in appropriately controlling intersegmental dynamics. We compared the performance of eight individuals with cerebellar damage to eight healthy controls as they walked or voluntarily stepped in place over a small obstacle. Joint kinematics and dynamics were calculated during swing phase for both movement contexts. The kinematic analysis showed that hypermetria occurred during both walking and stepping and was associated with excessive knee flexion. When present, the amplitude of hypermetria was greater during stepping compared to walking. During stepping, subjects with cerebellar damage produced excessive knee flexor muscle torques and consequently overcompensated for interaction and gravitational torques normally used to decelerate the limb. During walking, the torque pattern was very similar to that of control subjects walking over a taller obstacle, and therefore might be a voluntary compensatory strategy to avoid tripping. Our results show that the extent of kinematic and dynamic abnormalities associated with cerebellar leg hypermetria is context-specific, with more fundamental abnormalities of leg dynamics being apparent during stepping as opposed to walking.


Cerebellum Dysmetria Walking Stepping Human 



We would like to thank R. Bunoski for assistance with data collection, Drs. E. O’Hearn, S. Reich, R. Wityk, and D. Zee for patient referral, and Drs. P.S.G. Stein, W.T. Thach, and K. Thoroughman for thoughtful suggestions regarding this project. This study was supported by NIH grant HD040289 and the Foundation for Physical Therapy.


  1. Armstrong DM, Edgley SA (1984) Discharges of nucleus interpositus neurons during locomotion in the cat. J Physiol 351:411–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong DM, Marple-Horvat DE (1996) Role of the cerebellum and motor cortex in the regulation of visually controlled locomotion. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 74:443–455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong DM, Apps R, Marple-Horvat DE (1997) Aspects of cerebellar function in relation to locomotor movements. Prog Brain Res 114:401–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastian AJ, Martin TA, Keating JG, Thach WT (1996) Cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints. J Neurophysiol 76:492–509PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bastian AJ, Zackowski KM, Thach WT (2000) Cerebellar ataxia: torque deficiency or torque mismatch between joints? J Neurophysiol 83:3019–3030PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Botterell EH, Fulton JF (1938a) Functional localization in the cerebellum of primates II. Lesions of midline structures (vermis) and deep nuclei. J Comp Neurol 69:47–62Google Scholar
  7. Botterell EH, Fulton JF (1938b) Functional localization in the cerebellum of primates III. Lesions of hemispheres (neocerebellum). J Comp Neurol 69:63–87Google Scholar
  8. Brown TG (1911) The intrinsic factors in the act of progression in the mammal. Proc R Soc Lond 84:308–319Google Scholar
  9. Brown SH, Hefter H, Mertens M, Freund HJ (1990) Disturbances in human arm movement trajectory due to mild cerebellar dysfunction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 53:306–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambers WW, Sprague JM (1955a) Functional localization in the cerebellum I. Organization in longitudinal cortico-nuclear zones and their contribution to the control of posture, both extrapyramidal and pyramidal. J Comp Neurol 103:105–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chambers WW, Sprague JM (1955b) Functional localization in the cerebellum II. Somatotopic organization in cortex and nuclei. Arch Neurol Psych 74:653–680Google Scholar
  12. Cooper SE, Martin JH, Ghez C (2000) Effects of inactivation of the anterior interpositus nucleus on the kinematic and dynamic control of multijoint movement. J Neurophysiol 84:1988–2000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Corke PI (1996) A robotics toolbox for MATLAB. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 3:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dichgans J, Diener HC (1985) Clinical evidence for functional compartmentalization of the cerebellum. In: Bloedel JR, Dichgans J, Precht W (eds) Cerebellar functions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 126–147Google Scholar
  15. Diener HC, Hore J, Ivry R, Dichgans J (1993) Cerebellar dysfunction of movement and perception. Can J Neurol Sci Suppl 3:S62–69Google Scholar
  16. Earhart GM, Bastian AJ (2001) Cerebellar gait ataxia: selection and coordination of human locomotor forms. J Neurophysiol 85:759–769PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Eng JJ, Winter DA, Patla AE (1997) Intralimb dynamics simplify reactive control strategies during locomotion. J Biomech 30:581–588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Flament D, Hore J (1986) Movement and electromyographic disorders associated with cerebellar dysmetria. J Neurophysiol 55:1221–1233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Forssberg H, Grillner S (1973) The locomotion of the acute spinal cat injected with clonidine i.v. Brain Res 50:184–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodkin HP, Thach WT (2003) Cerebellar control of constrained and unconstrained movements. I. Nuclear inactivation. J Neurophysiol 89:884–895PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodkin HP, Keating JG, Martin TA, Thach WT (1993) Preserved simple and impaired compound movement after infarction in the territory of the superior cerebellar artery. Can J Neurol Sci (Suppl 3):S93–S104Google Scholar
  22. Grillner S (1975) Locomotion in vertebrates: central mechanisms and reflex interaction. Physiol Rev 55:247–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hallett M, Massaquoi SG (1993) Physiologic studies of dysmetria in patients with cerebellar deficits. Can J Neurol Sci (Suppl 3):S83–S92Google Scholar
  24. Hollerbach MJ, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol Cybern 44:67–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmes G (1939) The cerebellum of man. Brain 62:1–30Google Scholar
  26. Hore J, Wild B, Diener HC (1991) Cerebellar dysmetria at the elbow, wrist, and fingers. J Neurophysiol 65:563–571PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoy MG, Zernicke RF, Smith JL (1985) Contrasting roles of inertial and muscle moments at knee and ankle during paw-shake response. J Neurophysiol 54:1282–1294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ito M (1984) The cerebellum and neural control. Raven Press, New York, pp 183–188Google Scholar
  29. Jansen J, Brodal A (1940) Experimental studies on the intrinsic fibers of the cerebellum. II. The corticonuclear projection. J Comp Neurol 73:267–321Google Scholar
  30. Marple-Horvat DE, Criado JM, Armstrong DM (1998) Neuronal activity in the lateral cerebellum of the cat related to visual stimuli at rest, visually guided step modification, and saccadic eye movements. J Physiol 506:489–514PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McFadyen BJ, Carnahan H (1997) Anticipatory locomotor adjustments for accommodating versus avoiding level changes in humans. Exp Brain Res 114:500–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. McFadyen BJ, Lavoie S, Drew T (1999) Kinetic and energetic patterns for hindlimb obstacle avoidance during cat locomotion. Exp Brain Res 125:502–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Morton SM, Bastian AJ (2002) Does cerebellar damage impair control of interaction torques during walking over obstacles? Soc Neurosci Abstr 666.1Google Scholar
  34. Morton SM, Bastian AJ (2003) Relative contributions of balance and voluntary leg coordination deficits to cerebellar gait ataxia. J Neurophysiol 89:1844–1856PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Patla AE, Prentice SD (1995) The role of active forces and intersegmental dynamics in the control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion in humans. Exp Brain Res 106:499–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwartz AB, Ebner TJ, Bloedel JR (1987) Responses of interposed and dentate neurons to perturbations of the locomotor cycle. Exp Brain Res 67:323–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F (1981) Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man. J Neurosci 1:710–720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Stolze H, Klebe S, Petersen G, Raethjen J, Wenzelburger R, Witt K, Deuschl G (2002) Typical features of cerebellar ataxic gait. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:310–312Google Scholar
  39. Thach WT, Goodkin HP, Keating JG (1992) The cerebellum and the adaptive coordination of movement. Ann Rev Neurosci 15:403–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Timmann D, Horak FB (1998) Perturbed step initiation in cerebellar subjects. 1. Modifications of postural responses. Exp Brain Res 119:73–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Timmann D, Watts S, Hore J (2000) Causes of left-right ball inaccuracy in overarm throws made by cerebellar patients. Exp Brain Res 130:441–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Topka H, Konczak J, Dichgans J (1998a) Coordination of multi-joint arm movements in cerebellar ataxia: analysis of hand and angular kinematics. Exp Brain Res 119:483–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Topka H, Konczak J, Schneider K, Boose A, Dichgans J (1998b) Multijoint arm movements in cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of movement dynamics. Exp Brain Res 119:493–503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Trouillas P, Takayanagi T, Hallett M, Currier RD, Subramony SH, Wessel K, Bryer A, Diener HC, Massaquoi S, Gomez CM, Coutinho P, Ben Hamida M, Campanella G, Filla A, Schut L, Timann D, Honnorat J, Nighoghossian N, Manyam B (1997) International cooperative ataxia rating scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome. J Neurol Sci 145:205–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Udo M, Matsukawa K, Kamei H, Oda Y (1980) Cerebellar control of locomotion: effects of cooling cerebellar intermediate cortex in high decerebrate and awake walking cats. J Neurophysiol 44:119–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 56–57Google Scholar
  47. Yu J, Eidelberg E (1983) Recovery of locomotor function in cats after localized cerebellar lesions. Brain Res 273:121–131PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne M. Morton
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Goran S. Dordevic
    • 4
    • 5
  • Amy J. Bastian
    • 1
    • 2
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Kennedy Krieger InstituteJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Interdisciplinary Program in Movement Science, Program in Physical TherapyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biomedical EngineeringJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Faculty of Electronic EngineeringUniversity of NisSerbia and Montenegro
  6. 6.Motion Analysis Laboratory, Room G-05Kennedy Krieger InstituteBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations