Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 155, Issue 1, pp 56–62 | Cite as

Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements

  • Denise D. J. de GraveEmail author
  • Eli Brenner
  • Jeroen B. J. Smeets
Research Article


Pictorial illusions bias our judgments about certain visual attributes. Such illusions are therefore only expected to influence a task if these attributes are used to perform the task. When pointing to a position, different visual attributes could be used to guide the hand: direction and distance (or length) of the required displacement (vector coding) or the final position (position coding). In this study we used the Brentano illusion (an illusion of length) to determine which attributes are used in pointing. Several conditions were tested in which the visibility of the hand and the stimulus were varied. The illusion influenced movements between two points along the shaft of the figure, but not movements perpendicular to the shaft. When the hand and/or target were invisible during the movement, the influence of the illusion increased. Pointing movements under different visual conditions were based on different relative contributions of position and vector coding. The contribution of vector coding was always rather modest.


Illusion Action Perception Coding Human 


  1. Abrams RA, Meyer DE, Kornblum S (1990) Eye-hand coordination: oculomotor control in rapid aimed limb movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:248–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bizzi E, Hogan N, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Giszter S (1992) Does the nervous system use equilibrium point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? Behav Brain Sci 15:603–613Google Scholar
  3. Bock O, Eckmiller R (1986) Goal-directed arm movements in absence of visual guidance: evidence for amplitude rather than position control. Exp Brain Res 62:451–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrazzo M, McIntyre J, Zago M, Lacquaniti F (1999) Viewer-centered and body centered frames of reference in direct visuomotor transformations. Exp Brain Res 129:201–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Grave DDJ, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2002) Are the original Roelofs effect and the induced Roelofs effect caused by the same shift in straight ahead? Vis Res 42:2279–2285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Desmurget M, Pélisson D, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C (1998) From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:761–788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Feldman AG, Levin MF (1995) The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control. Behav Brain Sci 18:723–806Google Scholar
  8. Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Daprati E, Saetti MC, Toni I (1996) Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34:369–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillam B (1998) Illusions at century’s end. In: Hochberg J (ed) Perception and cognition at century’s end. Academic Press, London, pp 95–136Google Scholar
  10. Gillam B, Chambers D (1985) Size and position are incongruous: measurements on the Müller-Lyer figure. Percept Psychophys 37:549–556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Glover S, Dixon P (2001) Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:560–572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Glover S, Dixon P (2002) Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action. Percept Psychophys 64:266–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mack A, Heuer F, Villardi K, Chambers D (1985) The dissociation of position and extent in Muller-Lyer figures. Percept Psychophys 37:335–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McIntyre J, Stratta F, Lacquaniti F (1997) Viewer-centered frame of reference for pointing to memorized targets in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 78:1601–1618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. McIntyre J, Stratta F, Lacquaniti F (1998) Short-term memory for reaching to visual targets: Psychophysical evidence for body-centered reference frames. J Neurosci 18:8423–8435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Messier J, Kalaska JF (1997) Differential effect of task condition on errors of direction and extent of reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 115:469–478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Post RB, Welch RB (1996) Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions? Perception 25:569–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Prablanc C, Martin O (1992) Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol 67:455–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rossetti Y, Desmurget M, Prablanc C (1995) Vectorial coding of movement: vision, kinaesthesia, or both? J Neurophysiol 74:457–463PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Smeets JBJ, Brenner E, de Grave DDJ, Cuijpers RH (2002) Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Exp Brain Res 147:135–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2001) Endpoints of arm movements to visual targets. Exp Brain Res 138:279–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Vindras P, Viviani P (1998) Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:569–591Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denise D. J. de Grave
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eli Brenner
    • 1
  • Jeroen B. J. Smeets
    • 1
  1. 1.NeuroscienceErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations