Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 154, Issue 3, pp 355–358

The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in the counting Stroop task

  • Gail Hayward
  • Guy M. Goodwin
  • Catherine J. Harmer
Research Article

Abstract

The role of the anterior cingulate in the counting Stroop task was examined using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS was given over sites targeting more dorsal and more ventral anterior cingulate cortex and a control area of parietal cortex whilst subjects reported the number of words presented on the screen using a key press. The Stroop interference effect was abolished by TMS over both anterior cingulate sites. These findings support functional neuroimaging research which suggests that cingulate cortex is central to the processes underlying the Stroop task.

Keywords

Transcranial magnetic stimulation Medial frontal Attention 

References

  1. Botvinick M, Nystrom LE, Fissell K, Carter CS, Cohen JD (1999) Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 402:179–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bush G, Whalen PJ, Rosen BR, Jenike MA, McInerney SC, Rauch SL (1998) The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 6:270–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carter CS, Mintun M, Cohen JD (1995) Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: an H215O PET study of Stroop task performance. Neuroimage 2:264–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter CS, Macdonald AM, Botvinick M, Ross LL, Stenger VA, Noll D, Cohen JD (2000) Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:1944–1948PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen JY (1998) Stroop interference is the result of comparable, not of differential processing speeds of two stimulus dimensions. Percept Mot Skills 87:375–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Danckert J, Maruff P, Ymer C, Kinsella G, Yucel M, de Graaff S, Currie J (2000) Goal-directed selective attention and response competition monitoring: evidence from unilateral parietal and anterior cingulate lesions. Neuropsychology 14:16–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gehring WJ, Fencsik DE (2001) Functions of the medial frontal cortex in the processing of conflict and errors. J Neurosci 21:9430–9437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hallett M (2000) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature 406:147–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Harmer CJ, Thilo KV, Rothwell JC, Goodwin GM (2001) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of medial-frontal cortex impairs the processing of angry facial expressions. Nat Neurosci 4:17–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayward GN, Mehta M, Harmer CJ, Grasby PM, Goodwin GM (2003) Anterior cingulate cortex activity investigated with combined medial frontal TMS and PET H2 15O. Soc Neurosci Abstr 401.5Google Scholar
  11. Jahanshahi M, Rothwell J (2000) Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies of cognition: an emerging field. Exp Brain Res 131:1–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Janer KW, Pardo JV (1991) Deficits in selective attention following bilateral anterior cingulotomy. J Cogn Neurosci 3:231–241Google Scholar
  13. Liotti M, Woldorff MG, Perez R, Mayberg HS (2000) An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia 38:701–711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. MacLeod CM, MacDonald PA (2000) Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends Cogn Sci 4:383–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pardo JV, Pardo PJ, Janer KW, Raichle ME (1990) The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:256–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Posner MI, Dehaene S (1994) Attentional networks. Trends Neurosci 17:75–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:643–662Google Scholar
  18. Turken AU, Swick D (1999) Response selection in the human anterior cingulate cortex. Nat Neurosci 2:920–924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. van Veen V, Cohen JD, Botvinick MM, Stenger VA, Carter CS (2001) Anterior cingulate cortex, conflict monitoring, and levels of processing. Neuroimage 14:1302–1308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Walsh V, Rushworth M (1999) A primer of magnetic stimulation as a tool for neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia 37:125–135PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gail Hayward
    • 1
  • Guy M. Goodwin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Catherine J. Harmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryOxford UniversityOxfordUK
  2. 2.University Department of PsychiatryWarneford HospitalOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations