Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 154, Issue 1, pp 22–32 | Cite as

Tactile stimulus predictability modulates activity in a tactile-motor cortical network

  • A. J. Nelson
  • W. R. Staines
  • W. E. McIlroyEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Manipulating objects in the hand requires the continuous transformation of sensory input into appropriate motor behaviour. Using a novel vibrotactile device combined with fMRI, the cortical network associated with tactile sensorimotor transformations was investigated. Continuous tactile stimuli were delivered in a random or predictable pattern to the second digit on the right hand of all subjects. To better distinguish sensory and motor processes, subjects were instructed to make proportionate motor gripping responses with their left hand. A consistent cortical network of activation was revealed that included the supplementary motor, dorsal and ventral premotor, posterior parietal, primary and secondary somatosensory and primary motor cortex. Tracking the unpredictable versus predictable tactile stimulus led to greater delays in motor responses and to increased performance errors. Cortical effects due to stimulus predictability were observed in several components of the network, though it was most evident as increased cortical activation in frontal motor regions during tracking of unpredictable tactile stimuli. In contrast to the proposed hypotheses, primary and secondary somatosensory cortices contralateral to tactile input did not reveal enhanced responses during unpredictable tracking. Facilitation during unpredictable tracking was also observed in primary somatosensory cortex contralateral to motor responses, the receptive site for movement-related afference. The present study provides a novel and controlled approach to investigate the loci associated with tactile-motor processing and to measure the task-specific effect of stimulus predictability on network components.

Keywords

Sensorimotor transformations Tactile-motor cortical network Sensory reception Sensory-motor integration Motor integration Primary motor output 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) and the Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC). A.J.N. received graduate scholarship support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. W.R.S. received post-doctoral support from the Neuroscience Canada Foundation and the CIHR.

References

  1. Bandettini PA, Jesmanowicz A, Wong EC, Hyde JS (1993) Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain. Mag Res Med 30:161–173Google Scholar
  2. Burton H (2002) Cerebral cortical regions devoted to the somatosensory system: results from brain imaging studies in humans. In: Nelson RJ (ed) The somatosensory system: deciphering the brain’s own body image. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 27–72Google Scholar
  3. Burton H, Sinclair RJ (2000) Attending to and remembering tactile stimuli: a review of brain imaging data and single-neuron responses. J Clin Neurophysiol 17(6):575–591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton H, Abend NS, MacLeod AM, Sinclair RJ, Snyder AZ, Raichle ME (1999) Tactile attention tasks enhance activation in somatosensory regions of parietal cortex: a positron emission tomography study. Cereb Cortex 9:662–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen LG, Bandinelli S, Sato S, Kufta C, Hallet M (1991) Attenuation in detection for somatosensory stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 81:366–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox RW (1996) AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comp Biomed Res 29:162–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox RW, Jesmanowicz A (1999) Real-time 3D image registration for functional MRI. Mag Res Med 42:1014–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dassonville P, Lewis SM, Zhu XH, Ugurbil K, Kim SG, Ashe J (1998) Effects of movement predictability on cortical motor activation. Neurosci Res 32(1):65–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Deiber MP, Passingham RE, Colebatch JG, Friston KJ, Nixon PD, Frackowiak RS (1991) Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography. Exp Brain Res 84:393–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC (1995) Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Mag Res Med 33:636–647Google Scholar
  11. Francis ST, Kelly EF, Bowtell R Dunseath WJ, Folger SE, McGlone F (2000) FMRI of the responses to vibratory stimulation of digit tips. Neuroimage 11:188–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Friston KJ, Buechel C, Fink GR, Morris J, Rolls E, Dolan RJ (1997) Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 6:218–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Glover GH, Lai S (1998) Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus single-shot. Mag Res Med 39:361–368Google Scholar
  14. Grafton ST, Mazziotta JC, Woods RP, Phelps ME (1992) Human functional anatomy of visually guided finger movements. Brain 115:565–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham SJ, Staines WR, Nelson AJ, Plewes DB, McIlroy WE (2001) New devices to deliver somatosensory stimuli during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Mag Res Med 46:436–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guillery RW, Feig SL, Lozsadi DA (1998) Paying attention to the thalamic reticular nucleus. Trends Neurosci 21:28–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansson T, Brismar T (1999) Tactile stimulation of the hand causes bilateral cortical activation: a functional magnetic resonance study in humans. Neurosci Lett 271:29–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Huttunen J, Wikstrom H, Korvenoja A, Seppalainen AM, Aronen H, Ilmoniemi RJ (1996) Significance of the second somatosensory cortex in sensorimotor integration: enhancement of sensory responses during finger movements. Neuroreport 7(5):1009–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Innocenti GM (1986) General organization of callosal connections in the cerebral cortex. In: Jones EG, Peters A (eds) Cerebral cortex. 5. Sensory-motor areas and aspects of cortical connectivity. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Iwamura Y (2000) Bilateral receptive field neurons and callosal connections in the somatosensory cortex. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 355:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. James TW, Humphrey GK, Gati JS, Servos P, Menon RS, Goodale MA (2002) Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologica 40:1706–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jancke L, Loose R, Lutz K, Specht K, Shah NJ (2000) Cortical activations during paced finger tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli. Cogn Brain Res 10:51–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johansen-Berg H, Christensen V, Woolrich M, Matthews P (2000) Attention to touch modulates activity in both primary and secondary somatosensory areas. Neuroreport 11:1237–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Karhu J, Tesche CD (1999) Simultaneous early processing of sensory input in human primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices. J Neurophysiol 81(5):2017–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lutz K, Specht K, Shah NJ, Jancke L (2000) Tapping movements according to regular and irregular visual timing signals investigated with fMRI. Neuroreport 11(6):1301–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Manzoni T, Conti, F, Fabri M (1986) Callosal projections from area SII to SI in monkeys: anatomical organization and comparison with association projections. J Comp Neurol 252 (2):245–63Google Scholar
  27. Matthews PBC (1988) Proprioceptors and their contribution to somatosensory mapping: complex messages require complex processing. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 66:430–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer E, Ferguson SS, Zatorre RJ, Alivisatos B, Marrett S, Evans AC, Hakim AM (1991) Attention modulates somatosensory cerebral blood flow response to vibrotactile stimulation as measured by positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 29(4):440–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mima T, Nagamine T, Nakamura K, Shibasaki H (1998) Attention modulates both primary and second somatosensory cortical activities in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study. J Neurophysiol 80(4):2215–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson RJ (1996) Interactions between motor commands and somatic perception in sensorimotor cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 6:801–810CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rushworth MF, Nixon PD, Renowden S, Wade DT, Passingham RE (1997) The left parietal cortex and motor attention. Neuropsychologica 35:1261–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rushworth MF, Krams M, Passingham RE (2001) The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: the distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. J Cogn Neurosci 13:698–710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sarter M, Givens B, Bruno JP (2001) The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Res Rev 35:146–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schnitzler A, Slamelin R, Salenius S, Jousmaki V, Hari T (1995) Tactile information from the human hand reaches the ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex. Neurosci Let 200:25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shanks MF, Pearson RCA, Powell TPS (1985) The callosal connections of the primary somatic sensory cortex in the monkey. Brain Res Rev 9:43–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Staines WR, Graham S, Black S, McIlroy WE (2002) Task-relevant modulation of primary somatosensory cortex is mediated via prefrontal cortical gating system. Neuroimage 15(1):190–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Steinmetz PN, Roy A, Fitzgerald PJ, Hsiao SS, Johnson KO, Neibur E (2000) Attention modulates synchronized neuronal firing pattern in primate somatosensory cortex. Nature 404(6774):187–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zangaladze A, Epstein CM, Grafton ST, Sathian K (1999) Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation. Nature 401:587–590PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Nelson
    • 2
    • 3
  • W. R. Staines
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
  • W. E. McIlroy
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Graduate Department of Rehabilitation SciencesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Science CenterUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Institute of Medical ScienceUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of Medicine (Neurology)University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Department of Kinesiology and Health ScienceYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations