Communications in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 349, Issue 2, pp 753–776 | Cite as

Bigeodesics in First-Passage Percolation

Article
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

In first-passage percolation, we place i.i.d. continuous weights at the edges of \({\mathbb{Z}^2}\) and consider the weighted graph metric. A distance-minimizing path between points x and y is called a geodesic, and a bigeodesic is a doubly-infinite path whose segments are geodesics. It is a famous conjecture that almost surely, there are no bigeodesics. In the 1990s, Licea–Newman showed that, under a curvature assumption on the “asymptotic shape,” all infinite geodesics have an asymptotic direction, and there is a full measure set \({D \subset [0,2\pi)}\) such that for any \({\theta \in D}\), there are no bigeodesics with one end directed in direction \({\theta}\). In this paper, we show that there are no bigeodesics with one end directed in any deterministic direction, assuming the shape boundary is differentiable. This rules out existence of ground state pairs for the related disordered ferromagnet whose interface has a deterministic direction. Furthermore, it resolves the Benjamini–Kalai–Schramm “midpoint problem” (Benjamini et al. in Ann Probab 31, p. 1976, 2003). under the extra assumption that the limit shape boundary is differentiable.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alm S.E.: A note on a problem by Welsh in first-passage percolation. Combin. Probab. Comput. 7, 11–15 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alm S.E., Wierman J.: Inequalities for means of restricted first-passage times in percolation theory. Combin. Probab. Comput. 8, 307–315 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Auffinger, A., Damron, M., Hanson, J.: 50 years of first-passage percolation. arXiv:1511.03262 (2015)
  4. 4.
    Bakhtin Y., Cator E., Khanin K.: Space-time stationary solutions for the Burgers equation. J. Am. Math. Soc. 27, 193–238 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benjamini I., Kalai G., Schramm O.: First passage percolation has sublinear distance variance. Ann. Probab. 31, 1970–1978 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boivin D.: First passage percolation: the stationary case. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 86, 491–499 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boivin D., Derrien J.-M.: Geodesics and recurrence of random walks in disordered systems. Electron. Comm. Probab. 7, 101–115 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cator E., Pimentel L.P.R.: A shape theorem and semi-infinite geodesics for the Hammersley model with random weights. ALEA. 8, 163–175 (2011)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coupier D.: Multiple geodesics with the same direction. Electron. Commun. Probab. 16, 517–527 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coupier D., Tran V.: The 2D-directed spanning forest is almost surely a tree. Random Struct. Algorithms 42, 59–72 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Damron M., Hanson J.: Busemann functions and infinite geodesics in two-dimensional first-passage percolation. Commun. Math. Phys. 325, 917–963 (2014)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferrari P., Pimentel L.P.R.: Competition interfaces and second class particles. Ann. Probab. 33, 1235–1254 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forgacs, G., Lipowsky, R., Nieuwenhuizen, T.M.: The behaviour of interfaces in ordered and disordered systems. In: C. Domb and J. Lebowitz (eds.) Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 14, pp. 135–363. Academic Press, London (1991)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Georgiou, N., Rassoul-Agha, F., Seppäläinen, T.: Stationary cocycles and Busemann functions for the corner growth model. arXiv:1510.00859 (2015)
  15. 15.
    Georgiou, N., Rassoul-Agha, F., Seppäläinen, T.: Geodesics and the competition interface for the corner growth model. arXiv:1510.00860 (2015)
  16. 16.
    Häggström O., Meester R.: Asymptotic shapes for stationary first passage percolation. Ann. Probab. 23, 1511–1522 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoffman C.: Coexistence for Richardson type competing spatial growth models. Ann. Appl. Probab. 15, 739–747 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoffman C.: Geodesics in first-passage percolation. Ann. Appl. Probab. 18, 1944–1969 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Howard, C.D., Newman, C.M.: Euclidean models of first-passage percolation. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 108, 153–170 (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Howard C.D., Newman C.M.: Geodesics and spanning trees for Euclidean first-passage percolation. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 29, 577–623 (2001)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kesten, H.: Aspects of first passage percolation. École d’été de probabilités de Saint-Flour, XIV–1984, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1180. Springer, Berlin (1986)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Licea C., Newman C.M.: Geodesics in two-dimensional first-passage percolation. Ann. Probab. 24, 399–410 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Newman, C.: A surface view of first-passage percolation. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Zürich (1994)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Newman, C.: Topics in disordered systems. Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel. pp. viii+88. ISBN: 3-7643-5777-0 (1997)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pimentel L.P.R.: Multitype shape theorems for FPP models. Adv. Appl. Probab. 39, 53–76 (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tasaki H.: On the upper critical dimensions of random spin systems. J. Stat. Phys. 54, 163–170 (1989)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wehr J.: On the number of infinite geodesics and ground states in disordered systems. J. Stat. Phys. 87, 439–447 (1997)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wehr J., Woo J.: Absence of geodesics in first-passage percolation on a half-plane. Ann. Probab. 26, 358–367 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgia TechAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.CUNYNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations