Communications in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 328, Issue 3, pp 1255–1274 | Cite as

Controlling General Polynomial Networks

  • N. Cuneo
  • J. -P. Eckmann


We consider networks of massive particles connected by non-linear springs. Some particles interact with heat baths at different temperatures, which are modeled as stochastic driving forces. The structure of the network is arbitrary, but the motion of each particle is 1D. For polynomial interactions, we give sufficient conditions for Hörmander’s “bracket condition” to hold, which implies the uniqueness of the steady state (if it exists), as well as the controllability of the associated system in control theory. These conditions are constructive; they are formulated in terms of inequivalence of the forces (modulo translations) and/or conditions on the topology of the connections. We illustrate our results with examples, including “conducting chains” of variable cross-section. This then extends the results for a simple chain obtained in Eckmann et al. in (Commun Math Phys 201:657–697, 1999).


Equivalence Class Heat Bath Controllable Particle Vandermonde Determinant Commun Math Phys 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Eckmann J.-P., Hairer M.: Non-equilibrium statistical mechanics of strongly anharmonic chains of oscillators. Commun. Math. Phys. 212, 105–164 (2000)ADSCrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eckmann, J.-P., Hairer, M., Rey-Bellet L.: Non-equilibrium steady states for networks of springs. In preparationGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eckmann J.-P., Pillet C.-A., Rey-Bellet L.: Entropy production in nonlinear, thermally driven Hamiltonian systems. J. Stat. Phys. 95, 305–331 (1999)ADSCrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eckmann J.-P., Pillet C.-A., Rey-Bellet L.: Non-equilibrium statistical mechanics of anharmonic chains coupled to two heat baths at different temperatures. Commun. Math. Phys. 201, 657–697 (1999)ADSCrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eckmann J.-P., Zabey E.: Strange heat flux in (an)harmonic networks. J. Stat. Phys. 114, 515–523 (2004)ADSCrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hairer, M.: A probabilistic argument for the controllability of conservative systems. arxiv:math-ph/0506064
  7. 7.
    Hairer M.: How hot can a heat bath get?. Commun. Math. Phys. 292, 131–177 (2009)ADSCrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hörmander, L.: The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I–IV. New York: Springer, 1985Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jurdjevic, V.: Geometric control theory. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rey-Bellet, L.: Ergodic properties of Markov processes. Open Quantum Syst. II 139 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rey-Bellet L., Thomas L.E.: Asymptotic behavior of thermal nonequilibrium steady states for a driven chain of anharmonic oscillators. Commun. Math. Phys. 215, 1–24 (2000)ADSCrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Villani C.: Hypocoercivity. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 202, iv+141 (2009)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département de Physique ThéoriqueUniversité de GenèveGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Section de MathématiquesUniversité de GenèveGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations