Matrix Product States, Random Matrix Theory and the Principle of Maximum Entropy
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
- 274 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
Using random matrix techniques and the theory of Matrix Product States we show that reduced density matrices of quantum spin chains have generically maximum entropy.
Keywords
Maximum Entropy Random Matrix Haar Measure Lipschitz Constant Reduce Density Matrix
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Jaynes, E.T.: Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. 106(4), 05 (1957)Google Scholar
- 2.Jaynes, E.T.: Information theory and statistical mechanics. ii. Phys. Rev. 108(2), 10 (1957)Google Scholar
- 3.Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M.: Course of theoretical physics. Vol. 5: Statistical physics. Translated from the Russian by J. B. Sykes and M. J. Kearsley. Second revised and enlarged edition. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1968.Google Scholar
- 4.Jaynes, E.T.: Where do we stand on maximum entropy? In: Maximum entropy formalism (Conf., Mass. Inst. Tech., Cambridge, Mass., 1978), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979, pp. 15–118Google Scholar
- 5.Popescu S., Short A.J., Winter A.: Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics. Nat. Phys. 2(11), 754–758 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Vinayak, Žnidarič M.: Subsystem dynamics under random hamiltonian evolution. J. Phy. A: Math. Theor. 45(12), 125204 (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Masanes L., Roncaglia A.J., Acin A.: The complexity of energy eigenstates as a mechanism for equilibration. Phys. Rev. E. 8, 032137 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Brandão F.G.S.L., Ćwikliński P., Horodecki M., Horodecki P., Korbicz J. K., Mozrzymas M.: Convergence to equilibrium under a random hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. E 86, 031101 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Cramer M.: Thermalization under randomized local hamiltonians. New J. Phys. 14(5), 053051 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Linden N., Popescu S., Short A. J., Winter A.: Quantum mechanical evolution towards thermal equilibrium. Phys. Rev. E 79, 061103 (2009)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Linden N., Popescu S., Short A. J., Winter A.: On the speed of fluctuations around thermodynamic equilibrium. New J. Phys. 12(5), 055021 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Cramer M., Flesch A., McCulloch I.P., Schollwöck U., Eisert J.: Exploring local quantum many-body relaxation by atoms in optical superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett 101, 063001 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Flesch A., Cramer M., McCulloch I.P., Schollwöck U., Eisert J.: Probing local relaxation of cold atoms in optical superlattices. Phys. Rev. A 78, 033608 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Trotzky S., Chen Y.-A., Flesch A., McCulloch I.P., Schollwock U., Eisert J., Bloch I.: Probing the relaxation towards equilibrium in an isolated strongly correlated one-dimensional bose gas. Nat Phys 8(4), 325–330 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Jaynes E.T.: Prior probabilities. Systems Science and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on 4(3), 227–241 (1968)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 16.White Steven R.: Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863–2866 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Hastings M.B.: An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2007(08), P08024 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Perez-Garcia D., Verstraete F, Wolf M.M., Cirac J.I.: Matrix product state representations. Quantum Inf Comp. 7(5 & 6), 1–28 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 19.Collins B., Nechita I.: Random quantum channels i: Graphical calculus and the bell state phenomenon. Commu. Math. Phys. 297(2), 345–370 (2010)MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 20.Garnerone, S., de Oliveira, T.R., Zanardi, P.: Typicality in random matrix product states. Phys. Rev. A 81(3), 03 (2010)Google Scholar
- 21.Garnerone, S., de Oliveira, T.R., Haas, S., Zanardi, P.: Statistical properties of random matrix product states. Phys. Rev. A 82(5), 11 (2010)Google Scholar
- 22.Goldstein S., Lebowitz J., Tumulka R., Zangh‘ıN.: On the distribution of the wave function for systems in thermal equilibrium. J. Stat. Phys. 125, 1193–1221 (2006)Google Scholar
- 23.Reimann P.: Typicality for generalized microcanonical ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 160404 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Goldstein S., Lebowitz J.L., Tumulka R., Zangh‘ıN.: Long-time behavior of macroscopic quantum systems. The Eur. Phys. J. H 35, 173–200 (2010)Google Scholar
- 25.Bañuls M.C., Cirac J.I., Hastings M.B.: Strong and weak thermalization of infinite nonintegrable quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 050405 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Weingarten D.: Asymptotic behavior of group integrals in the limit of infinite rank. J. Math. Phys. 19, 99–1001 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Collins B.: Moments and cumulants of polynomial random variables on unitarygroups, the Itzykson-Zuber integral, and free probability. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2003(17), 953–982 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 28.Fulton, W.: Young tableaux, Volume 35 of London Mathematical Society Student Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997Google Scholar
- 29.Milman, V.D., Schechtman, G.: Asymptotic theory of finite dimensional normed spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1986Google Scholar
- 30.Ledoux, M.: The concentration of measure phenomenon, Volume 89 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. Amet. Math. Soc., RI: Providence, 2001Google Scholar
- 31.Collins B., ’Sniady P.: Integration with respect to the Haar measure on unitary, orthogonal and symplectic group. Commun. Math. Phys. 264, 773–795 (2006)MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 32.Montanaro, A.: Weak multiplicativity for random quantum channels. Commun. Math. Phys. 319(2), 535–555 (2013)Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013