Communications in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 310, Issue 1, pp 237–266 | Cite as

Minimizers of the Lawrence–Doniach Functional with Oblique Magnetic Fields

Article

Abstract

We study minimizers of the Lawrence–Doniach energy, which describes equilibrium states of superconductors with layered structure, assuming Floquet-periodic boundary conditions. Specifically, we consider the effect of a constant magnetic field applied obliquely to the superconducting planes in the limit as both the layer spacing s → 0 and the Ginzburg–Landau parameter \({\kappa = \epsilon^{-1} \to \infty}\), under the hypotheses that \({s=\epsilon^\alpha}\) with 0 < α < 1. By deriving sharp matching upper and lower bounds on the energy of minimizers, we determine the lower critical field and the orientation of the flux lattice, to leading order in the parameter \({\epsilon}\). To leading order, the induced field is characterized by a convex minimization problem in \({\mathbb {R}^3}\). We observe a “flux lock-in transition”, in which flux lines are pinned to the horizontal direction for applied fields of small inclination, and which is not present in minimizers of the anisotropic Ginzburg–Landau model. The energy profile we obtain suggests the presence of “staircase vortices”, which have been described qualitatively in the physics literature.

Keywords

Vortex Asymptotic Regime Layered Superconductor Landau Model Landau Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ABeB1.
    Alama S., Berlinsky A.J., Bronsard L.: Minimizers of the Lawrence–Doniach energy in the small-coupling limit: finite width samples in a parallel field. Ann. IHP-Analyse Nonlin. 19, 281–312 (2002)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. ABeB2.
    Alama S., Bronsard L., Berlinsky A.J.: Periodic vortex lattices for the Lawrence–Doniach model of layered superconductors in a parallel field. Commun. Contemp. Math. 3(3), 457–494 (2001)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ABS1.
    Alama S., Bronsard L., Sandier E.: On the shape of interlayer vortices in the Lawrence–Doniach model. Trans. AMS 360(1), 1–34 (2008)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ABS2.
    Alama S., Bronsard L., Sandier E.: Periodic Minimizers of the Anisotropic Ginzburg–Landau Model. Calc. Var. Part. Diff. Eqs. 36(3), 399–417 (2009)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ABS3.
    Alama, S., Bronsard, L., Sandier, E.: On the Lawrence–Doniach Model of Superconductivity: Magnetic Fields Parallel to the Axes. Preprint, 2010Google Scholar
  6. AyS.
    Aydi H., Sandier E.: Vortex analysis of the periodic Ginzburg-Landau model. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Nonlin. 26(4), 1223–1236 (2009)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BaK.
    Bauman P., Ko Y.: Analysis of solutions to the Lawrence-Doniach system for layered superconductors. SIAM J. Math. Anal 37(3), 914–940 (2005) (electronic)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BaX.
    Bauman, P., Xie, Z.: Layered Superconductors in Nearly Parallel Magnetic Fields. Abstract presented at: SIAM Conference on PDE, Miami, Dec. 7–10, 2009Google Scholar
  9. BuLK.
    Bulaevskiĭ L., Ledjiv M., Kogan V.: Vortices in layered superconductors with Josephson coupling. Phys. Rev. B 46, 366–380 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ChDG.
    Chapman S.J., Du Q., Gunzburger M.: On the Lawrence– Doniach and anisotropic Ginzburg–Landau models for layered superconductors. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 55, 156–174 (1995)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iy.
    Iye Y.: How Anisotropic Are the Cuprate High T c Superconductors?. Comments Cond. Mat. Phys. 16, 89–111 (1992)Google Scholar
  12. LaDo.
    Lawrence, W., Doniach, S.: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Low Temperature Physics E. Kanda (ed.), Kyoto: Academic Press of Japan, 1971, p. 361Google Scholar
  13. O.
    Odeh F.: Existence and bifurcation theorems for the Ginzburg–Landau equations. J. Math. Phys. 8, 2351–2356 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. SS.
    Sandier, E., Serfaty, S.: “Vortices in the Magnetic Ginzburg–Landau Model.” Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, Vol. 70. Boston: Birkhäuser, 2007Google Scholar
  15. SKMMW.
    Steinmeyer F., Kleiner R., Müller P., Müller H., Winze K.: Observation of the Flux Line Lock-In Transition in Layered Superconductors. Europhys. Lett. 25(6), 459–464 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. T.
    Tinkham, M.: Introduction to Superconductivity. 2nd edition, New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 1996Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Mathematics and StatisticsMcMaster Univ.HamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Institut Universitaire de France, Université Paris-Est., LAMA – CNRS UMR 8050CréteilFrance

Personalised recommendations