Advertisement

Communications in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 306, Issue 3, pp 663–694 | Cite as

The Quantum Double Model with Boundary: Condensations and Symmetries

  • Salman Beigi
  • Peter W. Shor
  • Daniel Whalen
Article

Abstract

Associated to every finite group, Kitaev has defined the quantum double model for every orientable surface without boundary. In this paper, we define boundaries for this model and characterize condensations; that is, we find all quasi-particle excitations (anyons) which disappear when they move to the boundary. We then consider two phases of the quantum double model corresponding to two groups with a domain wall between them, and study the tunneling of anyons from one phase to the other. Using this framework we discuss the necessary and sufficient conditions when two different groups give the same anyon types. As an application we show that in the quantum double model for S 3 (the permutation group over three letters) there is a chargeon and a fluxion which are not distinguishable. This group is indeed a special case of groups of the form of the semidirect product of the additive and multiplicative groups of a finite field, for all of which we prove a similar symmetry.

Keywords

Domain Wall Irreducible Representation Conjugacy Class Vertex Operator Fusion Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kitaev A.Yu.: Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann. Phys. 303, 2 (2003)MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bombin H., Martin-Delgado M.A.: A Family of Non-Abelian Kitaev Models on a Lattice: Topological Condensation and Confinement. Phys. Rev. B 78, 115421 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bombin, H., Martin-Delgado, M.A.: Nested Topological Order. http://arXiv:org/abs/0803.4299v1 [cond-mat.str-el], 2008
  4. 4.
    Levin M.A., Wen X.-G.: String-net condensation: A physical mechanism for topological phases. Phys. Rev. B 71, 045110 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buerschaper O., Aguado M.: Mapping Kitaevs quantum double lattice models to Levin and Wens string-net models. Phys. Rev. B 80, 155136 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davydov A.: Modular invariants for group-theoretical modular data I. J. Alg. 323(5), 1321–1348 (2010)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bombin H.: Topological Order with a Twist: Ising Anyons from an Abelian Model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 030403 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bravyi, S., Kitaev, A.Yu.: Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary. http://arXiv:org/abs/quant-ph/9811052.v1, 1998
  9. 9.
    Bakalov, B., Kirillov, A. Jr.: Lectures on tensor categories and modular functors. University Lecture Series, 21. Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc., 2001Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kitaev A.: Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond. Ann. Phys. 321(1), 2–111 (2006)MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naidu D.: Categorical Morita equivalence for group-theoretical categories. Commun. Alg. 35(11), 3544–3565 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Naidu D., Nikshych D.: Lagrangian Subcategories and Braided Tensor Equivalences of Twisted Quantum Doubles of Finite Groups. Commun. Mathe. Phys. 279, 845–872 (2008)MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bermudez A., Patane D., Amico L., Martin-Delgado M.A.: Topology Induced Anomalous Defect Production by Crossing a Quantum Critical Point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 135702 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nussinov Z., Ortiz G.: A symmetry principle for Topological Quantum Order. Ann. Physics 324(5), 977–1057 (2009)MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dickson L.E.: On finite algebras. Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen. Math. Phys. Kl. II, 358–393 (1905)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zassenhaus H.: Über endliche Fastkörper. Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 11, 187–220 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hall, M.: The theory of groups. New York: MacMillan Co., 1959Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Quantum InformationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  2. 2.School of MathematicsInstitute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM)TehranIran
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations