Advertisement

Communications in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 295, Issue 1, pp 139–160 | Cite as

Nonlinear Steepest Descent Asymptotics for Semiclassical Limit of Integrable Systems: Continuation in the Parameter Space

  • Alexander Tovbis
  • Stephanos Venakides
Article

Abstract

The initial value problem for an integrable system, such as the Nonlinear Schrödinger equation, is solved by subjecting the linear eigenvalue problem arising from its Lax pair to inverse scattering, and, thus, transforming it to a matrix Riemann-Hilbert problem (RHP) in the spectral variable. In the semiclassical limit, the method of nonlinear steepest descent ([4,5]), supplemented by the g-function mechanism ([3]), is applied to this RHP to produce explicit asymptotic solution formulae for the integrable system. These formule are based on a hyperelliptic Riemann surface \({\mathcal {R} = \mathcal {R}(x,t)}\) in the spectral variable, where the space-time variables (x, t) play the role of external parameters. The curves in the x, t plane, separating regions of different genuses of \({\mathcal {R}(x,t)}\), are called breaking curves or nonlinear caustics. The genus of \({\mathcal {R}(x,t)}\) is related to the number of oscillatory phases in the asymptotic solution of the integrable system at the point x, t. The evolution theorem ([10]) guarantees continuous evolution of the asymptotic solution in the space-time away from the breaking curves.

In the case of the analytic scattering data f(z; x, t) (in the NLS case, f is a normalized logarithm of the reflection coefficient with time evolution included), the primary role in the breaking mechanism is played by a phase function \({{\Im\,h(z;x,t)}}\), which is closely related to the g function. Namely, a break can be caused ([10]) either through the change of topology of zero level curves of \({\Im\,h(z;x,t)}\) (regular break), or through the interaction of zero level curves of \({{\Im\,h(z;x,t)}}\) with singularities of f (singular break). Every time a breaking curve in the x, t plane is reached, one has to prove the validity of the nonlinear steepest descent asymptotics in the region across the curve.

In this paper we prove that in the case of a regular break, the nonlinear steepest descent asymptotics can be “automatically” continued through the breaking curve (however, the expressions for the asymptotic solution will be different on the different sides of the curve). Our proof is based on the determinantal formula for h(z; x, t) and its space and time derivatives, obtained in [8,9]. Although the results are stated and proven for the focusing NLS equation, it is clear ([9]) that they can be reformulated for AKNS systems, as well as for the nonlinear steepest descend method in a more general setting.

Keywords

Breaking Point Semiclassical Limit Level Curf Abelian Differential Hyperelliptic Riemann Surface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baik, J., Kriecherbauer, Th., et al.: Integrable Systems and Random Matrices: In honor of Percy Deift. Contemp. Math. Volume 458, Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc., 2008Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belokolos E.D., Bobenko A.I., Enol’Skii V.Z., Its A.R.: Algebro-geometric Approach to Nonlinear Integrable Equations. Berlin-Heidelberg-NewYork, Springer (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deift P., Venakides S., Zhou X.: New results in small dispersion kdv by an extension of the steepest descent method for Riemann-Hilbert problems. Internat. Math. Res. Notices 6, 286–299 (1997)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deift P., Zhou X.: A steepest descent method for oscillatory Riemann-Hilbert problems. Asymptotics for the mkdv equation. Ann. of Math. 137, 295–370 (1993)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deift P., Zhou X.: Asymptotics for the painleve II equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 48(3), 277–337 (1995)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farkas H.M., Kra I.: Riemann Surfaces. Springer Verlag, NewYork (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kamvissis S., McLaughlin K.T.-R., Miller P.D.: Semiclassical Soliton Ensembles for the Focusing NonLinear Schrödinger Equation. Annals of Mathematics Studies 154. Princeton Unversity Press, Princeton NJ (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tovbis, A., Venakides, S.: Determinant form of modulation equations for the semiclassical focusing nonlinear schrn++dinger equation. http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.2066v1[math-ph], 2008
  9. 9.
    Tovbis A., Venakides S.: Determinant form of the complex phase function of the steepest descent analysis of Riemann-Hilbert problems and its application to the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation. IMRN 2009, 2056–2080 (2009)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tovbis A., Venakides S., Zhou X.: On semiclassical (zero dispersion limit) solutions of the focusing nonlinear Schroedinger equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math 57(7), 877–985 (2004)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tovbis, A., Venakides, S., Zhou, X.: Semiclassical focusing nonlinear Schroedinger equation i: Inverse scattering map and its evolution for radiative initial data. International Mathematics Research Notices 2007(ID rnm094):54 pages, doi: 10.1093/imrn/rnm094, 2007

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations