Communications in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 266, Issue 1, pp 197–210 | Cite as

On the Conserved Quantities for the Weak Solutions of the Euler Equations and the Quasi-geostrophic Equations



In this paper we obtain sufficient conditions on the regularity of the weak solutions to guarantee conservation of the energy and the helicity for the incompressible Euler equations. The regularity of the weak solutions are measured in terms of the Triebel-Lizorkin type of norms, \(\dot {\mathcal F}^s_{p,q}\) and the Besov norms, \(\dot {\mathcal B}^s_{p,q}\). In particular, in the Besov space case, our results refine the previous ones due to Constantin-E-Titi (energy) and the author of this paper (helicity), where the regularity is measured by a special class of the Besov space norm \(\dot {\mathcal B}^s_{p,\infty}= \dot {\mathcal N}^s_p\), which is the Nikolskii space. We also obtain a sufficient regularity condition for the conservation of the L p -norm of the temperature function in the weak solutions of the quasi-geostrophic equation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arnold V.I., Khesin B.A. (1998) Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics. Springer-Verlag Inc., Berlin Heidelberg New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chae D. (2003) Remarks on the Helicity of the 3-D Incompressible Euler Equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 240(3): 501–507ADSMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chae D. (2003) The quasi-geostrophic equation in the Triebel-Lizorkin spaces. Nonlinearity 16, 479–495CrossRefADSMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Constantin P. (1994) Geometric Statistics in Turbulence. SIAM Rev. 36, 73–98CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Constantin P., E, W., Titi, E. Onsager’s Conjecture on the Energy Conservation for Solutions of Euler’s Equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 165(1), 207–209 (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Constantin, P., Majda, A., Tabak, E. Formation of strong fronts in the 2-D quasi-geostrophic thermal active scalar. Nonlinearity 7, 1459–1533 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Córdoba D. (1998) Nonexistence of simple hyperbolic blow-up for the quasi-geostrophic equation. Ann. of Math. 148, 1135–1152CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Córdoba D., Fefferman C. (2002) Growth of solutions for QG and 2D Euler equations. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15(3): 665–670CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duchon J., Robert R. (2000) Inertial Energy Dissipation for Weak Solutions of Incompressible Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations. Nonlinearity 13, 249–255CrossRefADSMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Majda A., Bertozzi A. (2002) Vorticity and Incompressible Flow. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moffat H.K., Tsinober A. (1992) Helicity in Laminar and Turbulent Flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 281–312CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Resnick, S. Dynamical Problems in Non-linear Advective Partial Differential Equations. Ph.D Thesis, University of Chicago, 1995Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shnirelman, A. Weak Solutions with Decreasing Energy of Incompressible Euler Equations. Commun. Math. Phys., 210, 541–603Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stein E.M. (1970) Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Triebel H. (1983) Theory of Function Spaces. Birkäuser Verlag, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu J. (1997) Inviscid limits and regularity estimates for the solutions of the 2-D dissipative Quasi-geostrophic equations. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 46(4): 1113–1124CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsSungkyunkwan UniversitySuwonKorea

Personalised recommendations