In reflection seismology one places sources and receivers on the Earth's surface. The source generates elastic waves in the subsurface, that are reflected where the medium properties, stiffness and density, vary discontinuously. In the field, often, there are obstructions to collect seismic data for all source-receiver pairs desirable or needed for data processing and application of inverse scattering methods. Typically, data are measured on the Earth's surface. We employ the term data continuation to describe the act of computing data that have not been collected in the field. Seismic data are commonly modeled by a scattering operator developed in a high-frequency, single scattering approximation. We initially focus on the determination of the range of the forward scattering operator that models the singular part of the data in the mentioned approximation. This encompasses the analysis of the properties of, and the construction of, a minimal elliptic projector that projects a space of distributions on the data acquisition manifold to the range of the mentioned scattering operator. This projector can be directly used for the purpose of seismic data continuation, and is derived from the global parametrix of a homogeneous pseudodifferential equation the solution of which coincides with the range of the scattering operator. We illustrate the data continuation by a numerical example.
Manifold Seismic Data Seismic Reflection Inverse Scattering Reflection Data
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
De Hoop, M.V., Brandsberg-Dahl, S.: Maslov asymptotic extension of generalized Radon transform inversion in anisotropic elastic media: A least-squares approach. Inverse Problems 16, 519–562 (2000)CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
De Hoop, M.V., Malcolm, A.E., Le Rousseau, J.H.: Seismic wavefield `continuation' in the single scattering approximation: A framework for Dip and Azimuth MoveOut. Can. Appl. Math. Q. 10, 199–238 (2002)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Deregowski, S.G., Rocca, F.: Geometrical optics and wave theory of constant offset sections in layered media. Geoph. Prosp. 29, 374–406 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duistermaat, J.J.: Fourier integral operators. Boston: Birkhäuser, 1996Google Scholar
Goldin, S.: Superposition and continuation of transformations used in seismic migration. Russ. Geol. and Geophys. 35, 131–145 (1994)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Grechka, V., Tsvankin, I., Cohen, J.K.: Generalized Dix equation and analytic treatment of normal-moveout velocity for anisotropic media. Geoph. Prosp. 47, 117–148 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillemin, V.: In: Pseudodifferential operators and applications (Notre Dame, Ind., 1984), Chapter ``On some results of Gel'fand in integral geometry'', Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc., 1985, pp. 149–155Google Scholar
Guillemin, V., Sternberg, S.: Some problems in integral geometry and some related problems in microlocal analysis. Amer. J. of Math. 101, 915–955 (1979)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar