Advertisement

Ergodic Coactions with Large Multiplicity and Monoidal Equivalence of Quantum Groups

  • Julien BichonEmail author
  • An De Rijdt
  • Stefaan Vaes
Article

Abstract

We construct new examples of ergodic coactions of compact quantum groups, in which the multiplicity of an irreducible corepresentation can be strictly larger than the dimension of the latter. These examples are obtained using a bijective correspondence between certain ergodic coactions on C*-algebras and unitary fiber functors on the representation category of a compact quantum group. We classify these unitary fiber functors on the universal orthogonal and unitary quantum groups. The associated C*-algebras and von Neumann algebras can be defined by generators and relations, but are not yet well understood.

Keywords

Neural Network Statistical Physic Complex System Nonlinear Dynamics Quantum Computing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Baaj, S., Skandalis, G.: Unitaires multiplicatifs et dualité pour les produits croisés de C*-algèbres. Ann. Scient. Ec. Norm. Sup. 26, 425–488 (1993)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banica, T.: Théorie des représentations du groupe quantique compact libre O(n). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 322, 241–244 (1996)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banica, T.: Le groupe quantique compact libre U(n). Commun. Math. Phys. 190, 143–172 (1997)CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banica, T.: Quantum automorphism groups of homogeneous graphs. J. Funct. Anal. 224, 243–280 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banica, T.: Quantum automorphism groups of small metric spaces. Pac. J. Math. 219, 27–52 (2005)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bichon, J.: Galois extension for a compact quantum group. http://arxiv.org/list/math.QA/9902031, 1999Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bichon, J.: The representation category of the quantum group of a non-degenerate bilinear form. Comm. Algebra 31, 4831–4851 (2003)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bichon, J.: Corepresentation theory of universal cosovereign Hopf algebras. http://arxiv.org/list/math.QA/0211059, 2002Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bichon, J.: Quantum automorphism groups of finite graphs. Proc. Amer. Math Soc. 131, 665-673 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boca, F.: Ergodic actions of compact matrix pseudogroups on C*-algebras. In: Recent advances in operator algebras (Orléans, 1992). Astérisque 232, 93–109 (1995)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bruguières, A.: Dualité tannakienne pour les quasi-groupoïdes quantiques. Comm. Algebra 25, 737–767 (1997)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carter, J.S., Flath, D.E., Saito, M.: The classical and quantum 6j-symbols. Mathematical Notes 43, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doplicher, S., Longo, R., Roberts, J.E., Zsidó, L.: A remark on quantum group actions and nuclearity. Rev. Math. Phys. 14, 787–796 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drinfel'd, V.G.: Quantum groups. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc., 1987, pp. 798–820Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Etingof, P., Gelaki, S.: On cotriangular Hopf algebras. Amer. J. Math. 123, 699–713 (2001)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Høegh-Krohn, R., Landstad, M.B., Størmer, E.: Compact ergodic groups of automorphisms. Ann. of Math. (2) 114, 75–86 (1981)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jimbo, M.: A q-difference analogue of Open image in new window and the Yang-Baxter equation. Lett. Math. Phys. 10, 63–69 (1985)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Landstad, M.: Simplicity of crossed products from ergodic actions of compact matrix pseudogroups. In: Recent advances in operator algebras (Orléans, 1992). Astérisque 232, 111–114 (1995)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Landstad, M.: Ergodic actions of nonabelian compact groups. In: Ideas and methods in mathematical analysis, stochastics, and applications (Oslo, 1988), Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992, pp. 365–388Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    MacLane, S.: Categories for the working mathematician. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 5, Berlin–New York: Springer-Verlag, 1971Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosso, M.: Algèbres enveloppantes quantifiées, groupes quantiques compacts de matrices et calcul différentiel non commutatif. Duke Math. J. 61, 11–40 (1990)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schauenburg, P.: Hopf bi-Galois extensions. Comm. Algebra 24, 3797–3825 (1996)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tomatsu, R.: Compact quantum ergodic systems. http://arxiv.org/list/math.OA/0412012, 2004Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ulbrich, K.-H.: Galois extensions as functors of comodules. Manuscripta Math. 59, 391–397 (1987)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Daele, A., Wang, S.: Universal quantum groups. Internat. J. Math. 7, 255–263 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang, S.: Ergodic actions of universal quantum groups on operator algebras. Commun. Math. Phys. 203, 481–498 (1999)CrossRefADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wassermann, A.: Ergodic actions of compact groups on operator algebras. I. General theory. Ann. of Math. (2) 130, 273–319 (1989)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wassermann, A.: Ergodic actions of compact groups on operator algebras. II. Classification of full multiplicity ergodic actions. Canad. J. Math. 40, 1482–1527 (1988)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wassermann, A.: Ergodic actions of compact groups on operator algebras. III. Classification for SU(2). Invent. Math. 93, 309–354 (1988)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Woronowicz, S.L.: Compact quantum groups. In: Symétries quantiques (Les Houches, 1995), Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1998, pp. 845–884Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Woronowicz, S.L.: Twisted SU(2) group. An example of a non-commutative differential calculus. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 23, 117–181 (1987)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Woronowicz, S.L.: Tannaka-Krein duality for compact matrix pseudogroups. Twisted SU(N) groups. Invent. Math. 93, 35–76 (1988)CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yamagami, S.: Fiber functors on Temperley-Lieb categories. http://arxiv.org/list/math.QA/ 0405517, 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Mathématiques AppliquéesUniversité de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, IPRA, Avenue de l'UniversitéPauFrance
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsK.U.LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.Institut de Mathématiques de JussieuAlgèbres d'OpérateursParisFrance

Personalised recommendations