Advertisement

Communications in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 261, Issue 3, pp 789–797 | Cite as

The Spectra of Quantum States and the Kronecker Coefficients of the Symmetric Group

  • Matthias ChristandlEmail author
  • Graeme Mitchison
Article

Abstract

Determining the relationship between composite systems and their subsystems is a fundamental problem in quantum physics. In this paper we consider the spectra of a bipartite quantum state and its two marginal states. To each spectrum we can associate a representation of the symmetric group defined by a Young diagram whose normalised row lengths approximate the spectrum. We show that, for allowed spectra, the representation of the composite system is contained in the tensor product of the representations of the two subsystems. This gives a new physical meaning to representations of the symmetric group. It also introduces a new way of using the machinery of group theory in quantum informational problems, which we illustrate by two simple examples.

Keywords

Neural Network Statistical Physic Complex System Nonlinear Dynamics Quantum State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Araki, H., Lieb, E.H.: Entropy inequalities. Commun. Math. Phys. 18, 160–170 (1970)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gell-Mann, M.: California Institute of Technology Synchrotron Laboratory Report, CTSL-20, 1961 (unpublished); Symmetries of baryons and mesons. Phys. Rev. 125, 1067–1084 (1962)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hagen, C.R., MacFarlane, A.J.: Reduction of representations of SUmn with respect to the subgroup Open image in new window J. Math. Phys. 6(9), 1355–1365 (1965)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayashi, M., Matsumoto, K.: Quantum universal variable-length source coding. Phys. Rev. A 66(2), 022311 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Itzykson, C., Nauenberg, M.: Unitary groups: Representations and decompositions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 38(1), 95–120 (1966)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keyl, M., Werner, R.F.: Estimating the spectrum of a density operator. Phys. Rev. A 64(5), 052311 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirillov, A.N.: An invitation to the generalized saturation conjecture. math.CO/0404353, 2004Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Macdonald, I.G.: Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials. Oxford mathematical monographs. Oxford: Clarendon, 1979Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ne'eman, Y.: Derivation of strong interactions from a gauge invariance. Nuclear Phys. 26, 222–229 (1961)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weyl, H.: The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1950Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wigner, E.: On the consequences of the symmetry of the nuclear Hamiltonian on the spectroscopy of nuclei. Phys. Rev. 51, 106–119 (1936)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Quantum Computation, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.MRC Laboratory of Molecular BiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations