Advertisement

Communications in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 238, Issue 3, pp 379–410 | Cite as

Unextendible Product Bases, Uncompletable Product Bases and Bound Entanglement

  • David P. DiVincenzo
  • Tal Mor
  • Peter W. Shor
  • John A. Smolin
  • Barbara M. Terhal
Article

Abstract

We report new results and generalizations of our work on unextendible product bases (UPB), uncompletable product bases and bound entanglement. We present a new construction for bound entangled states based on product bases which are only completable in a locally extended Hilbert space. We introduce a very useful representation of a product basis, an orthogonality graph. Using this representation we give a complete characterization of unextendible product bases for two qutrits. We present several generalizations of UPBs to arbitrary high dimensions and multipartite systems. We present a sufficient condition for sets of orthogonal product states to be distinguishable by separable superoperators. We prove that bound entangled states cannot help increase the distillable entanglement of a state beyond its regularized entanglement of formation assisted by bound entanglement.

Keywords

Hilbert Space High Dimension Entangle State Product State Complete Characterization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alon, N., Lovász, L.: Unextendible product bases. J. Combinatorial Theory, Ser. A 95, 169–179 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., Wootters, W.K.: Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895–1899 (1993)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Popescu, S., Schumacher, B., Smolin, J.A., Wootters, W.K.: Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722–725 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennett, C.H., DiVincenzo, D.P., Fuchs, C.A., Mor, T., Rains, E.M., Shor, P.W., Smolin, J.A., Wootters, W.K.: Quantum nonlocality without entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070–1091 (1999), quant-ph/9804053CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bennett, C.H., DiVincenzo, D.P., Mor, T., Shor, P.W., Smolin, J.A., Terhal, B.M.: Unextendible product bases and bound entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5385–5388 (1999), quant-ph/9808030CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bennett, C.H., DiVincenzo, D.P., Smolin, J.A., Wootters, W.K.: Mixed state entanglement and quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824–3851 (1996)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bennett, C.H.: Private communicationGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bollobás, B.: Graph Theory. New York: Springer, 1979Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dür, W., Cirac, J.I., Lewenstein, M., Bruss, D.: Distillability and partial transposition in bipartite systems. Phys. Rev. A 61, 062313 (2000), quant-ph/9910022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    DiVincenzo, D.P., Shor, P.W., Smolin, J.A., Terhal, B.M., Thapliyal, A.V.: Evidence for bound entangled states with negative partial transpose. Phys. Rev. A 61, 062312 (2000), quant-ph/9910026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DiVincenzo, D.P., Terhal, B.M.: Product bases in quantum information theory. Proceedings of the XIII International Congress on Mathematical Physics, London, July 2000Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    DiVincenzo, D.P., Terhal, B.M., Thapliyal, A.V.: Optimal decompositions of barely separable states. J. Modern Optics 47(2/3), 377–385 (2000), quant-ph/9904005Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gottesman, D.: Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction. PhD thesis, CalTech, 1997, quant-ph/9705052Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P.: Reduction criterion of separability and limits for a class of distillation protocols. Phys. Rev. A 59, 4206–4216 (1999), quant-ph/9708015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, R.: Separability of mixed states: Necessary and sufficient conditions. Phys. Letts. A 223, 1–8 (1996), quant-ph/9605038CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, R.: Mixed state entanglement and distillation: Is there a ``bound'' entanglement in nature? Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5239–5242 (1998), quant-ph/9801069CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, R.: General teleportation channel, singlet fraction, and quasidistillation. Phys. Rev. A 60, 1888–1898 (1999), quant-ph/9807091CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, R.: Bound entanglement can be activated. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1056–1059 (1999), quant-ph/9806058CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, R.: Binding entanglement channels. J. Modern Optics 47(2/3), 347–354 (2000), quant-ph/9904092Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Horodecki, P.: Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition. Phys. Lett. A 232, 333–339 (1997), quant-ph/9703004CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Horodecki, P., Smolin, J.A., Terhal, B.M., Thapliyal, A.V.: Rank two bound entangled states do not exist. J. Theor. Comp. Sci. 292(3), 589–596 (2003) See also [Ter99], quant-ph/9910122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hardy, G.H., Wright, E.M.: An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers. New York: Oxford University Press, Fifth edition, 1979Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lovász, L.: On the Shannon capacity of a graph. IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory 25, 1–7 (1979)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Newman, M.: On a theorem of Čebotarev. Linear and Multilinear Algebra 3, 259–262 (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peres, A.: Private communicationGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peres, A.: Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rains, E.M.: Entanglement purification via separable superoperators. quant-ph/9707002Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rains, E.M.: Rigorous treatment of distillable entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 60, 173–178 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Terhal, B.M.: A family of indecomposable positive linear maps based on entangled quantum states. Lin. Alg. and Its Appl. 323, 61–73 (2001)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Terhal, B.M.: Quantum Algorithms and Quantum Entanglement. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1999Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • David P. DiVincenzo
    • 1
  • Tal Mor
    • 2
  • Peter W. Shor
    • 3
  • John A. Smolin
    • 1
  • Barbara M. Terhal
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM T.J. Watson Research CenterUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of Electrical EngineeringUCLALos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.AT&T ResearchFlorham ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations